Slate's Bizbox
the breakfast table: An e-mail conversation about the news of the day.

Katha Pollitt and Andrew Sullivan

the breakfast table
entries
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990
from: Katha Pollitt

1910? Them were the Good Old Days?

Posted Tuesday, May 5, 1998, at 5:27 PM ET

Andrew,

Well, I'm glad you think me your equal in slyness. But do I read you correctly to say that you long for the mores of the year 1910, before the progressive income tax turned us red-blooded Americans into collectivist mice at the mercy of the Big State? You really ARE reactionary! I keep forgetting that.

The state was pretty big in 1910, Andrew. For instance, it outlawed information about birth control and many other forms of free speech; it enforced Jim Crow laws in the South; it denied women the right to vote and barred them from many occupations and activities. It used its police power on behalf of mining and industrial interests to break strikes, beat up demonstrators, and deport immigrants with the wrong ideas. What conservatives usually mean when they talk about Big Government is government that puts some kind of limit on the power of business to do whatever it wants. For all your opposition to the Big State, for instance, don't you oppose legal abortion? Even though effectively criminalizing abortion would mean an immense expansion of police power.

What really amazes me in your posts is your reluctance to admit that the US has, or ever had, any problems or injustices or wrongs that the left addressed and the right did not. You treat the left's record on everything from race to worker safety, for example, as a public-relations triumph. But it was real! (And of course I don't accept the left's responsibility for US wars in Korea and Vietnam either.) As for taxes--I would gladly give half my income to live in a country without desperate poverty and homelessness, with good schools and health care and child care for all who need it, with real environmental protection and good public services, and in which people who work for a living earn enough to live decently, as in this country too many full-time workers do not. If that meant I had less disposable income it would be worth it!

Equally unrepentant,
Katha

the breakfast table
entries
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990
from: Katha Pollitt

1910? Them were the Good Old Days?

Posted Tuesday, May 5, 1998, at 5:27 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Katha Pollitt is a columnist at The Nation. Andrew Sullivan is a senior editor at the New Republic.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Unsung Statesman
Marc Thiessen | By the time he left office, Jesse Helms had become a mainstream conservative.
David Broder: Unabashed Racist