• The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
  Should there be a shooting range next to the Supreme Court gift shop?
  Walter Dellinger
  posted June 27, 2008
• The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
  Was it ever Miller time?
  Dahlia Lithwick
  posted June 26, 2008
• What's the Big Secret?
  Continuing the conversation.
  Patrick Radden Keefe
  posted Aug. 30, 2007
• A Supreme Court Conversation
  Everything convservatives should abhor.
  Walter Dellinger
  posted June 29, 2007
• The Midterm Elections
  The blame game, George Allen, and more.
  Mark Halperin
  posted Nov. 3, 2006
• Search for more the breakfast table articles
• Subscribe to the the breakfast table RSS feed
• View our complete the breakfast table archive

Katha Pollitt and Andrew Sullivan

Katha,

It's a very good question. Many times I have tried to figure out what it is about the man that truly offends me. As you point out, I'm quite happy with many of the results of his policies--the expansion of free trade, the reform of welfare, the reduction of the deficit, the acquiescence to the rollback of reverse racial discrimination. Yes, I'm not so happy about his support of the death penalty, his signing of the Defense of Marriage Act, his Bosnia debacle, his civil-liberties record, his anti-smoking crusade. But then I'm not a lock-step conservative, as you know. And you can't have everything. So what is it?

For my part, it's not sex and drugs and rock 'n' roll. Believe me. Some of my best friends are sex-crazed stoners. I think, ultimately, it's because of his moral vacuity on a more profound level. Bosnia was the clincher for me. He said it was a holocaust, then did nothing to stop it, then claimed credit for ending it, then apologized for the holocaust. Anyone who can use such a grave moral issue so glibly and cynically is pretty close to being evil. Ditto his complete lack of substance on civil rights. Here is a man who says he is against discrimination, then fires more gay people from the military than George Bush, signs DOMA (then boasts about it, then apologizes for it), signs a bill to expel HIV-positive people from the military (then says he didn't mean it), signs a bill barring HIV-positive immigrants from entering the country, and asks for less money on AIDS research than the Republican Congress. It's not the end result that gets me so much. A Republican might have been worse on both Bosnia and civil rights. It's his refusal to take moral responsibility for anything, or take credit for things he opposed, or evade blame where blame is genuinely deserved. When someone like that is at the head of the country, it is truly corrosive of our morality in the real sense of that word. Because it is truly corrosive of any sense of personal responsibility. He has the super-ego of a seven-year-old.

Sometimes, I really think he is evil.

Best,
Andrew

PRINTDISCUSSE-MAIL

• Arts & Life
  If Only Aliens Would Abduct the New X-Files Movie
• Arts & Life
  A Great Horror Film About Paper Bags
• Arts & Life
  Brideshead Revisited Is Literature's Finest Schlock
• Sports
  How Michael Chang Ruined Tennis for Asian-
  Americans

• Today's Headlines
• Can't Go Wrong With A Cheeseburger, Area Man Reports
  Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:21 -0400
• Courageous E-mail To Boss In Drafts Folder Since December
  Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0400
• Novak Hits Pedestrian With Corvette
  Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:00:45 -0400
• » More from the Onion

• Today's Headlines
• Poll: Hispanic Voters Back Obama by Wide Margins
  Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:04:26 GMT
• Opinion: Germans See Themselves in Obama
  Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:53:52 GMT
• How the Mosley Orgy Ruling Could Affect U.K. Media
  Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:59 GMT
• » More from Newsweek

• Today's Headlines
• Over the Rainbow: Angie and Jo
  Tue, 22 July 2008 16:21:23 GMT
• The New Tavis Smiley, Beware!
  Tue, 22 July 2008 16:27:58 GMT
• Go for the Bronze
  Fri, 25 July 2008 4:18:27 GMT
• » More from The Root