the breakfast table
columns
- The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Should there be a shooting range next to the Supreme Court gift shop?
Walter Dellinger
posted June 27, 2008 - The Supreme Court Breakfast Table
Was it ever Miller time?
Dahlia Lithwick
posted June 26, 2008 - What's the Big Secret?
Continuing the conversation.
Patrick Radden Keefe
posted Aug. 30, 2007 - A Supreme Court Conversation
Everything convservatives should abhor.
Walter Dellinger
posted June 29, 2007 - The Midterm Elections
The blame game, George Allen, and more.
Mark Halperin
posted Nov. 3, 2006 - Search for more the breakfast table articles
- Subscribe to the the breakfast table RSS feed
- View our complete the breakfast table archive
Lisa Zeidner and John Allen Paulos
Hooray for Immediacy and Vulgarity
Posted Thursday, July 1, 1999, at 1:11 PM ETHi Lisa,
I share your anxiety over the perils of journalistic and Internet instantaneity. Novel-writing certainly has a different logic and pace to it. So does a nonfiction book. I, who rail about random samples, yesterday cited Jay Leno's man-on-the-street interviews as bolstering my point about widespread ignorance. I have a monthly column on abcnews.com and have hosted a few online chats in connection with it and also found them to be dauntingly immediate, a question about the annual number of automobile fatalities in the United States followed by one requesting a solution to a differential equation online (it was easy so I complied). I have a greater appreciation for people who must respond on the spur of the moment and in public to all sorts of off-the-wall questions, politicians in particular.
People do seem (I have no evidence and am not sure what would constitute such) to be getting increasingly impatient. If I ever come across an old movie classic on HBO, I'm amazed at how poky the action often seems to me. We're accustomed to fast cuts, a quick unfolding of the story, simultaneous developments.
Of course, there is a difference between temporal and spatial shortness. What I'm getting at is the famous quote by Proust (or maybe it was Anatole France) apologizing to someone for writing a long letter and explaining that he didn't have time to write him a short one. That is the flip side of manic quickness: the bloated, repetitive writing that is so ubiquitous (assuming ubiquity admits of degrees).
I sometimes perform some magic trick for my class, reveal its secrets, and then ask them to write an expository piece explaining it. They complain bitterly that it is unfair to require this of math majors and particularly resent my grading policy. Their grades, I inform them, are inversely proportional to the number of words in their pieces provided they capture every salient detail. I tell them that a sense of elegance and concision is essential in mathematics and this is one way to nurture this sense, but not too many buy it.
Instantaneity, or at least timeliness, is the essence of the newspaper, else it'd be the oldspaper. Did you see the stories in yesterday's Philadelphia papers about the 70-year-old Philadelphia woman who finally admitted to killing 8 of her 10 children in the '50s and '60's. She got probation and a suspended sentence, ostensibly so science could study her! Would have been a monster national story if she confessed 30 years ago.
Anyway, instantaneity, for all its pitfalls, is important in the news business. Most people realize that most news stories and almost all active Web sites contain errors and that they should reserve judgement.
Not only is timeliness essential in journalism, but so, I think, is a certain amount of vulgarity. The public's business is being discussed, and hiding behind flowery, polysyllabic words, precious, convoluted sentences, and euphemistic, obfuscatory parallelisms (as I do here) does not further that discussion. Given the reams of coverage and dozens of studies of breast implants, auto-immune diseases, and the lack of a connection between the two, for example, I've never read something as straightforwardly clear as "Hysterical Women and Greedy Lawyers Combine To Bankrupt Dow" Such expressions (and contrary ones) have their place amid the more measured, nuanced accounts.
As always,
John
Hooray for Immediacy and Vulgarity
Posted Thursday, July 1, 1999, at 1:11 PM ETfeedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Historical Archives: A Jest For You
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: Hay Thieves Strike Again
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:00:00 -0400 - Historical Archives: John Jacob Astor Out Looking For Beaver
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
PostPartisan: The DebateRobinson | Punch, Counterpunch
Gerson: Two McCain SuccessesKing: Straight Out of a SitcomMeyerson: Old John
- Dionne: Who Is John McCain, Really?
- Ignatius: In Praise of Complete Sentences
- Parker: Wake Me When the Debate Starts
- Editorial: Their Pre-Meltdown Mind-Set
- Today's Headlines
- Economic Crisis: Europe's Response
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:43:06 GMT - What America's Smartest Women Say About Sarah Palin
Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:46:41 GMT - Personal Finance: Conservative Investing
Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:53:19 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- An Obama-Palin Ticket
Thu, 9 October 2008 18:16:56 GMT - Love the Player, Hate the GM
Thu, 9 October 2008 21:10:07 GMT - Schooling McCain on the Man Code
Thu, 9 October 2008 20:03:04 GMT - » More from The Root

the breakfast table













