Slate's Bizbox




the breakfast table: An e-mail conversation about the news of the day.

Decter and Podhoretz

from: Norman Podhoretz

Censure or No Censure?

Posted Tuesday, Feb. 9, 1999, at 1:33 PM ET

About that, at least, we agree. But the issue is academic: The votes simply aren't there for conviction. Now the only question remains whether a censure resolution should follow the inevitable acquittal. And on this issue, having already broken ranks with my fellow conservatives, I will now slide even further down the slippery slope of heresy. I know, I know: Censure is a means for the Democrats to have it both ways. It is therefore politically against the interests of the Republicans, who would like to accuse the Dems of a new kind of softness on crime and a cavalier disregard of the disgrace their President has brought upon his office. I also realize that censure would set a tricky precedent. Even so, it would mean that Clinton wouldn't go scot-free, and that his reprehensible behavior would be officially labeled as such.

from: Norman Podhoretz

Censure or No Censure?

Posted Tuesday, Feb. 9, 1999, at 1:33 PM ET
Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Midge Decter is an essayist and social critic who publishes in a variety of magazines and appears most frequently in Commentary. Norman Podhoretz is editor at large of Commentary magazine and a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. His latest book, Ex-Friends, was published this month.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES




Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Imagine if...
Hiatt | What if McCain had waged his campaign based on respect?
Editorial: Meddlesome PalinKing: The Danger of Palin Power