
Strossen and Kozinski
Nadine:
Aren't you forgetting the difference between private action and government coercion? Civil liberties as I understand the term involves freedom from the government. When the government threatens to regulate interactions between private parties, that's when civil libertarians should start getting worried. This is particularly true when the interactions are in the form of private communications.
The justification for the FTC's involvement here seems sparse. Websites can only learn about you what you choose to tell your web browser and communications software. Most people recognize no obligation to tell the truth when asked nosey questions by electronic snoopers--they lie to protect their privacy. Moreover, there are lots of private solutions to this supposed problem: You can use Anonymizer or Luckman's Anonymous Cookie to hide your tracks when cruising the web, and you can use encoding (e.g., Pretty Good Privacy-PGP) to ensure that no one misuses your e-mail. And as the Geocities settlement shows, you can enforce existing norms about consumer fraud and misrepresentation.
Let's not always go to Big Brother for the solution. Give freedom a chance to work.
G'night.
Ciao. AK
P.S. The answer is neither.
The Tea Party Protesters Are Getting Smarter
Lithwick: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's Trial Is a Lousy Place To Examine the Legality of Torture
Who Is Mrs. Cohen From Hadera, and Should Israelis Care Where She Puts Her Money?
What Wired, Esquire, and Hooters Magazines Think You Should Give for Christmas
Save the Planet. Eat More Brie.
How Easy Is It To Hike Into Iran Accidentally?











