
At Least They're Not Calling Him Pol Pot
Posted Friday, March 23, 2001, at 3:31 PM ET"McCainism, the McCarthyism of today's 'progressives' ..."
--George F. Will, Washington Post, March 21, 2001
"... [John McCain,] the Robespierre of American politics. ..."
--Charles Krauthammer, Washington Post, March 23, 2001
What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
Hitchens: How Iraqi Oil Could Change Everything in the Middle East
The Perfect Gift for the Policy Wonk in Your Life
Wait, the Whig Party Is Making a Comeback?
The Copenhagen Climate Conference Is Really Freaking Out My 9-Year-Old
Is Health Care Reform Without a Public Option Better Than Nothing?
The Unspeakably Raunchy English Sex Clubs of the 18th Century












Reader Comments From The Fray:
Unless you are into body counts, Robespierre was just as bad as Pol Pot.
--David W. Rochlin
(To reply, click here.)
Am I seeing George Will making use of the recently decried Liberal argument that the "appearances" aren't all that matter, that facts must be established, and charges supported with more than speculation? Is Mr. Will debunking the myth that everything that looks bad must be bad? Bravo, George! Encore!
--Tony Adragna
(To reply, click here.)
(3/26)