press box
columns
- What Does Rupert Murdoch Want?
Former Wall Street Journal Managing Editor Paul Steiger hasn't a clue.
Jack Shafer
posted July 25, 2008 - Why the Press Is Ignoring the Edwards "Love Child" Story
A double standard is at work.
Jack Shafer
posted July 23, 2008 - A Midsummer Harvest of Bogus Trend Stories
Drivel from the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Boston Globe.
Jack Shafer
posted July 22, 2008 - Building a Better Anonymice Trap
Messrs. Starkman and Jelveh show the way.
Jack Shafer
posted July 18, 2008 - Tracking the Anonymice
See how they run in the Post, the Timeses, and the Journal.
Jack Shafer
posted July 15, 2008 - Search for more press box articles
- Subscribe to the press box RSS feed
- View our complete press box archive
Buzzing Howie Kurtz's Buzzometer
Jack ShaferPosted Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2001, at 12:17 PM ET

Washington Post media reporter Howard Kurtz asserts today that Web journalism is all but dead and that "Slate barely registers in the buzz department."
Z'at so, Howie? One rough measure of a publication's "buzz" is the number of mentions it receives in Kurtz pieces, so I fired up my Nexis account and performed a Boolean search of Kurtz's Post byline and the names of several magazines. During the past 12 months--presumably Slate'sbuzzless year--Kurtz mentioned Slate 16 times. Slate's cybercompetitor, Salon, rated 18 mentions. If Slate has indeed so completely fallen off Kurtz's buzzometer, what assessment awaits the nation's other politics and culture magazines? Here's the breakdown of Kurtz mentions over the past year:
Atlantic Monthly: 2 mentions
New Republic: 13 mentions
The New Yorker: 13 mentions
Weekly Standard: 17 mentions
But enough about the Slate buzz in Kurtz's ear--what about the Kurtz buzz in Slate's ears? The rate at which the man makes us vibrate is increasing, according to a Nexis search. During the past year, we've mentioned him 28 times compared to 19 the year before. Way to go, Howie!
Illustration by Mark Alan Stamaty.
Reader Comments From The Fray:
Right now the simple fact is that online journalism is an insiders' game of tag for the most part, with much of the interesting flow of info, deals, contacts, gossip etc. focusing on the players in the inside journalism world. This is a yawn to the "eyeballs" who would support online journalism as a more serious venture.
The biggest obstacle to the success of online journalism is what the hardware people call the "form factor." You can't carry Slate on a bus or read it in the bathroom. You won't read it at the breakfast table. You don't plop down on the couch to unwind and flip on Slate for some background music. You can't read it in bed before you go to sleep. You can't read it at the lunch counter. These are the venues where most quotidian journalism coexists with the appetites and inflection points of the ordinary human day.
When broadband wireless internet becomes as common as literacy in the nineteenth century or transistor sets in the sixties and seventies, you will see the transfer of power from the one-to-many to the many-to-many media. I will retire in 2012 and that will probably be the launch date of a Slate that you can read with your toast or hot water bottle.
Until then it will mostly function as a watering hole for the pros which will be kibbitzed by the second tier of info workers and cranks, just like the old bars across the street from the daily papers.
--Zeitguy
(To reply, click
here.)
To Zeitguy:
One thing that online journalism brings is what we're in right now. The fact that you were able to post your well-said response in real-time testifies to that. In print, radio, TV, etc, the only responses to editorials or points of opinion is the occasional letter to the editor about a day or week old issue. In The Fray, you have the chance to respond and give your two cents in about 10 minutes. I think there are some posters that knock the online journalists flat, and they aren't even paid to do it! They're just writing from the passion of their heart in the timespan of the 15 minutes they spend online every morning checking the news. I agree that it's nice to plop down on the futon with a copy of Time or Newsweek and make fun of the latest politics, but I find almost as enjoyable popping into The Fray and skewering some poor poster.
--Number Jonny 5
(To reply, click
here.)
(2/21)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] 134-Year-Old Man Attributes Longevity To Typographical Error
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:00:36 -0400 - Can't Go Wrong With A Cheeseburger, Area Man Reports
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:21 -0400 - Courageous E-mail To Boss In Drafts Folder Since December
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Let the Oil Deals FlowRaad Alkadiri | Congress should not interfere in the oil industry's contract negotiations with the Iraqi government.
- Ronald Kessler: Happy 100th Birthday, FBI!
- Binder & Evans: How to Teach Evolution
- Colbert I. King: More D.C. Incompetence
- Today's Headlines
- Alter: How History Shapes Coverage of Candidates
Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:01:40 GMT - Obama’s Paris Visit Captivates French Minorities
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:26:56 GMT - Did a Test Company Mess Up Its Hopes to Go Global?
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:03:32 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Over the Rainbow: Angie and Jo
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:21:23 GMT - The New Tavis Smiley, Beware!
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:27:58 GMT - Go for the Bronze
Fri, 25 July 2008 4:18:27 GMT - » More from The Root

press box









