explainer
columns
- How Do You Diagnose Autism?
Michael Savage thinks doctors are getting it wrong.
Juliet Lapidos
posted July 22, 2008 - Pre-emptive Presidential Pardons
Can you be pardoned for a crime before you're ever charged?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 21, 2008 - What's a Bank Run?
And how do you get on the FDIC's secret problem list?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 18, 2008 - So Help You, Dog
How does a canine cop become a "sworn officer?"
Brian Palmer
posted July 18, 2008 - Blind Reading
Why would booksellers buy a title without knowing anything about it?
Noreen Malone
posted July 17, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
What Does "Federalism" Mean?
Emily YoffePosted Thursday, Nov. 30, 2000, at 5:42 PM ET
Everyone is throwing around the word "federalism" in the legal fight between Al Gore and George Bush about whether the state courts or the U.S. Supreme Court should decide the issue over counting the Florida ballots. What do people mean when they say "federalism"?
As Humpty Dumpty, Al Gore, and George Bush said, "When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean." The Federalist, essays first published in 1787 written primarily by Alexander Hamilton, advocated a strong central government as did the short-lived political party of the same name. But the word "federalism," which first appeared in 1789, according to Merriam-Webster has a more neutral meaning. It is a blanket term describing the division of power and responsibility between states and the federal government. But what has happened to the word is that people with righteous causes not only stand and give speeches in front of a whole lot of flags, they wrap themselves in the protective mantle of federalism. That's why Al Gore's legal brief on why the U.S. Supreme Court should stay out of Florida's business says "principles of federalism counsel strongly against interference by this court. ..." And that's why the Bush side sees the appropriate interpretation here of federalism to mean that the federal court has to straighten out the erring state court. What's so wonderful about this is that the positions of the two parties are generally reversed on the question of whether the states or the federal government should exercise the most power.
Next question?
Explainer thanks Frederick Shauer of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, Akhil Reed Amar of Yale Law School, Donald Ritchie of the Senate Historical Office, and Sanford Levinson of the University of Texas School of Law.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] Hewlett-Packard Introduces New Soup-Resistant Laptop
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:00:09 -0400
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:00:27 -0400- Queen Elizabeth II Announces She's Pregnant Again
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
A Grand TourDavid Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon
- David Ignatius: Middle East Peace for Dummies
- Robert Novak: Scandal at the Pentagon
- Dana Milbank: Sorry We Asked, Sorry You Told
- Jamie Barnett: Defending Our Values
- Today's Headlines
- Democrats Ignore Mukasey Plea for New Gitmo Law
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:17:16 GMT - John Mellencamp Tackles Race, Politics in New Album
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:44:03 GMT - Readers Fired Up By Teen-Pregnancy Issue
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:30:57 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Burden of Proof
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:06:08 GMT - Obama in Berlin
Tue, 22 July 2008 15:20:11 GMT - When Thugs Cry
Wed, 16 July 2008 18:25:58 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer









