explainer
columns
- $596 Trillion!
How can the derivatives market be worth more than the world's total financial assets?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted Oct. 15, 2008 - Was Columbus Struck by Lightning?
What kept the Santa María from having its mainmast shivered?
Michael Shollar
posted Oct. 13, 2008 - What's Up With ACORN?
How a community-organizing group became Republican cause célèbre.
Jacob Leibenluft
posted Oct. 10, 2008 - Is the European Credit Crisis Our Fault?
Not really—they were dumb enough to buy the mortgages.
Christopher Beam
posted Oct. 10, 2008 - Can Paulson Fire Naughty Executives?
How much control does the Treasury have over personnel at AIG?
Juliet Lapidos
posted Oct. 8, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
Stop Me Before I FAQ Again
Emily YoffePosted Monday, Nov. 20, 2000, at 6:39 PM ET
Who is paying for the Florida recount?
Floridians. Because of the closeness of the race, the recount was automatically triggered by state law, so the counties are picking up the tab. Palm Beach County, for example, estimates the cost of its recount so far to be in the low six-figures. This includes paying county employees to examine chad instead of perform their regular duties. And the county also has to absorb the cost of keeping government buildings open into the night as well as overtime for the sheriff's office, which is providing security. However, the observers from the political parties are not being paid by the state.
Is it true that when these county employees find a hanging chad on a ballot, they then create a brand-new, chad-free duplicate?
There is a procedure under Florida law to create a new ballot, but it is limited to cases where a ballot has been damaged and therefore unreadable by machine. (Even after a hand count, a further machine count could be requested by a candidate.) In Palm Beach County the duplicate is made on a pink card, and the mangled original is removed, presumably to be stored forever in a lockbox.
What's the procedure for Congress to challenge the legitimacy of the votes of Florida's Electoral College electors--assuming Florida ends up choosing electors?
Let me count the ways. There is a procedure that allows any slate of electors, or any single elector, to be challenged when Congress counts the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6. (The date is set by law, but it can be changed--as it has been when the 6th falls on a weekend as it does this year.) On Jan. 6 (or whenever) both houses meet in joint session with the vice president (that would be Al Gore) presiding. Objections are called for as part of the routine process. If there are any, they have to be made by both a senator and representative and put in writing. Each house then meets in a two-hour caucus to debate the merits of the objection. To refuse certification of an elector, a majority of the members of both houses have to vote to reject, or else the slate is accepted. Since the new House of Representatives will have a Republican majority, if everyone votes along party lines, Democrats would be unable to refuse to certify a Florida Bush slate. But Republicans could mount such a challenge to a Florida Gore slate. In that case, their success would depend on the makeup of the next Senate. If Washington's Slade Gorton wins the still-undecided senatorial race, the Senate will have 51 Republicans--enough to throw out the slate and toss the election to the House of Representatives. But if challenger Maria Cantwell wins, the Senate will split 50-50, and Gore could cast the deciding vote in favor of his electors.
Why do Republicans refuse to use the adjective "democratic" to describe the Democratic Party?
It's a little bit of gamesmanship, with the Republicans refusing to sully the word "democratic" by allowing it to be applied to the opposition. This has been going on for decades. The apex of this lexicological battle was the 1976 vice presidential debates when Republican candidate Bob Dole described such things as World War II and Vietnam as "Democrat wars."
Next question?
Explainer thanks Marc Caputo of the Palm Beach Post; Ernest Hawkins of the National Association of County Recorders, Election Officials, and Clerks; Michael White of the Office of the Federal Register; and Darrell West of Brown University.
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Poll: 85 Of Americans Would Like To See Candidates Compete In Funny Obstacle Course
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:00:01 -0400 - 'I Am Under 18' Button Clicked For First Time In History Of Internet
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:30:31 -0400 - British Corpses Piling Up
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 07:00:36 -0400 - » More from the Onion
Fiscal Drunkards, Dry OutRuth Marcus | Which candidate could lead us to economic sobriety?
Meyerson: Gods That FailedMilbank: Confidence Isn't Cheap
- Telnaes: McCain's Foray Into Pandora's Box
- Gerson: How He Was Ambushed by History
- Parker: Palin Can Save the Mainstream Media
- Topic A: A Game-Changing Debate?
- Today's Headlines
- White House Fails to Fill Key Anti-Terror Job
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:27:11 GMT - Suicide Spurs Web Regulation in South Korea
Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:24:47 GMT - Are You a 'Digital Native?'
Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:55:29 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Over Before it Began?
Tue, 14 October 2008 17:58:14 GMT - A Bucket of Chicken and No Clue
Tue, 14 October 2008 16:57:24 GMT - The Hitler Comparison
Tue, 14 October 2008 19:01:10 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer













