Slate's Bizbox




explainer: Answers to your questions about the news.

Is George W. Bush Barred From Canada?


According to Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, "Driving while under the influence of alcohol is regarded as an extremely serious offence in Canada, and persons with convictions for this offence are inadmissible to Canada."

So could George W. Bush go to Canada?



Yes, although he is supposed to apply for a waiver. People with driving under the influence convictions, even minor ones from years ago, are supposed to get a Minister's Permit, which allows entry for people otherwise barred. But most people who enter the country, especially Americans driving across the border, do not know of this restriction and are not asked about DUI convictions by immigration officials. If a person coming in is asked and lies, that would be grounds for removal from the country. Bush is not in violation of these restrictions, even inadvertently, because he's never been to Canada. (He's pretty much a homebody. He's been to Mexico, visited family members in China and Italy, represented his father on a trip to Gambia, and toured the Middle East with U.S. governors.) Of course, if Bush is elected president, Canadians can be assured if he crosses the border someone else will be the designated driver. And speaking of George Bush's arrest ...

If Elected, Would Bush Be the First President With a Criminal Record?

It looks that way; historians cannot recall any presidents who have been arrested prior to election. Some had brushes with the law but no arrests. Andrew Jackson was detained as a boy during the Revolutionary War by a British officer, but that doesn't count. And as a young man (and an older one) John F. Kennedy had his love life monitored by the FBI.

Next question?

Explainer thanks Rene Mercier of the department for Citizenship and Immigration Canada, Donald Ritchie of the Senate Historical Office, Gil Troy of McGill University, and reader Elisabeth Anne Riba for suggesting the questions.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Emily Yoffe is the author of What the Dog Did: Tales From a Formerly Reluctant Dog Owner. You can send your Human Guinea Pig suggestions or comments to .
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Reader Comments from The Fray:


[Note from the Fray Editor: There was a lot of comment on this article, but most of it consisted of anti-Canadian sentiments which didn't seem worth passing along.]


The president, in his diplomatic capacity, would be able to make official visits regardless of this restriction and would preclude the necessity of a waiver. I think the Canadian law has merit in sending a message that drunk driving should not be tolerated and barring persons with DWI history is in the public interest of Canada.

I wonder, however, if the such a border crossing restriction violates NAFTA?

--James W Jordan

(To reply, click here.)

(11/10)





Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
Unsung Statesman
Marc Thiessen | By the time he left office, Jesse Helms had become a mainstream conservative.
David Broder: Unabashed Racist