HOME / moneybox: Daily commentary about business and finance.

Ad Report Card: Political Snicker-ing

When the interminable showdown between George W. Bush and Al Gore--or Al W. Gore, as David Letterman calls him--finally winds down, will there be anything to miss? Well, yes, actually, I think we'll miss the jokes. Both candidates have made for fine comedy material, and apparently even the candidates themselves have had the opportunity to enjoy Saturday Night Live, for instance, making a mockery of them making a mockery of political debate. My favorite recurring bit, which I'm sad to say seems to have been discontinued, was Alan Kalter's Campaign Roundup, in which the David Letterman announcer simply sang the hook from "Who Let the Dogs Out?" at the top of his lungs. Pretty much says it all, if you ask me. Big time.

Anyway, it's one thing for the talk shows to make fun of political candidates, but it seems like something of a watershed when consumer product companies start doing the same thing in their ads. There are at least two examples, one more pointed than the other. One involves a small surprise, so if you want to see it before I give it away, you can check out the ad here via Adcritic.com (you'll need QuickTime); a slightly less effective version of the same surprise happens at this related Web site. The sharper ad is for, of all things, Snickers candy bars. You can see it either on Adcritic or on the Snickers site.

The Ads: The first spot shows office-seeker Bob Fremgen, strolling in a playground. "No candidate cares more about our kids," says the saccharine announcer. Fremgen begins to address the camera but is abruptly pushed to the ground--by the Energizer bunny. Yes, the long-lasting Energizer tactic of a spoof ad that turns out to be for the batteries and their famous mascot is still with us. Energizer extends the gag to bobfremgen.com (also being hyped in various banner ads on politics-related Web pages), with candidate facts (13 kids), slogan ("Without children, there would be no adults"), and mythology (He started his campaign alone in a shed and now has headquarters in a strip mall over by the Hunan River Garden).

In the Snickers commercial, a young guy walks into a voting booth, and, once behind the curtain, is beset upon by two small animated creatures: elephant and donkey, one whispering into each of vote-boy's ears. "Psst," the elephant says. "Vote for me. My dad was president. I even look like my dad." "Big deal," the donkey counters. "My dad was a senator." As vote-boy knits his brow in Gen-X befuddled ambivalence, the creatures plow ahead (speaking in hammy cartoon voices that sound nothing like the actual candidates). Elephant notes that he and his dad have the same shoe size, and donkey counters that he invented the Internet, "and some other stuff, too." "Once my mom thought I was my dad," elephant boasts. (Creepy.) "The space shuttle--that was mine," replies donkey. Elephant: "On the phone, people think I'm my dad." Donkey puckers: "Kiss me, I'm on TV." Here the announcer cuts in to suggest that if you're not going anywhere for a while, you may as well have a Snickers, which is what vote-boy does while he wallows in his indecision. "My dad and I wear the same pants," the elephant remarks. (What?!) "I invented pants," the donkey claims. And the tag line: Hungry? Grab a Snickers.

Yay or Nay? The Energizer spot falls well short of hilarity in this instance, but it's surprising that this trick still works at all--this time in part because it takes advantage of the blizzard of interchangeable political ads for local, statewide, and national candidates that seem to dominate commercial time as Election Day approaches. With extra credit for the Web site, give it a C-plus.

I think the Snickers spot deserves an A, however. People have been e-mailing me about it since it started airing (correctly naming the advertised product, which isn't always the case with popular ads). What is it that they're responding to? In a campaign season whose dominant theme has been its own banality, this seems like as effective a satire of the trivialities of political discourse as any we've seen, jabbing at candidates and voter alike. It probably works in the spot's favor that it's for a product whose ads have never been remotely interesting in the past. Of course, the ultimate message--maybe this ephemeral consumer product can obliterate the shame of your ignorance for a moment or two--is kind of depressing. But hey, that's politics for you.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Rob Walker writes the Ad Report Card for Slate.
COMMENTS

Reader Comments from The Fray:


[Notes from the Fray Editor: There was defense of the bunny: it's the kid hits the candidate, not the bunny (or as Jeff put it, "Hey Walker, leave the rabbit alone")--we like to imagine the wording of a NYT-type correction on that one. And there was defense of past Snickers ads--"what do you mean, not interesting, they were always great." And there were arguments about the candidates' policies (can't even get away from them in Moneybox Fray? Yup). Cheshyre's discussion of Cocoa Puffs, below, provoked quite the argument, considering it wasn't the ad the article was about, and your Fray Editor has to ask: isn't voting to get what you want exactly what the American system is all about? In general the comments were pretty serious, with little of the usual Ad Report joking. The election casts its shadow everywhere...]



It's not funny when corporations deploy images built up over years for their products in relation to politics. On the surface it seems okay, and initially it can appear even-handed. However, after such ads become accepted, corporations can then deploy these images in subtle favor of the candidate of their choice. In this case, it is clear the elephant/donkey ad favors Bush, because the ad recycles Republican spin against Gore while making Bush seem funny, so the corporation involved is making its pitch in the manner described. They have already moved on to phase 2. Anybody can see the danger in this.

--Rex

(To reply, click here.)


There's one thing about the Snickers ad that you don't seem to get (and I'm guessing it's because most of you Slate people are in favor of our present two-party lock on the political process); the guy in the booth isn't indecisive because he's "ignorant", it's because the mainstream Republican and Democratic candidates both suck, and that's why it's a funny commercial. (I approved of it so much I bought a Snickers yesterday and I wasn't even hungry.) I hate the fact that Gen-Xers like myself are always characterized as apathetic or stupid just because many of us don't blindly follow the Way of the Donkey and Elephant.

Go Snickers! Oh yeah, and vote Libertarian.

--Joe Wingerter

(To reply, click here.)


Has anybody else seen the "Vote Sonny" ads? They show an elephant and donkey stumping for votes, then Sonny (the Cocoa Puffs mascot) gets on a podium and basically says that if enough kids vote for him, he'll put chocolate money in every box of cereal. You can see the deal here.

Seriously, what sort of message is this giving to kids about the electoral process? Bribing voters is perfectly normal? The only reason to vote is if you get something out of it? Frankly, I find the whole campaign rather disturbing; a dope slap on whomever thought it up.

--Cheshyre

(To reply, click here.)

(10/27)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
Very superstitious.90/091113_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on unemployment.50/091113_TC.jpg
Follow the leaper.1/122939/2183724/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg