The Aesthetics of Corporate Greed
Rob WalkerPosted Tuesday, Aug. 15, 2000, at 4:15 PM ET
None of the newspapers I read carried the picture I most wanted to see today, which was a photograph of the "Corporate Greed Monster" that I'd read was part of the protest activity outside the Staples Center in Los Angeles. I wanted to see it for two reasons. One is that all protests that aim to take on corporate power and its allies now seem to include giant puppets. Why is that? Anyway, the second reason is that this particular puppet seemed like something worth seeing--corporate greed itself, brought to life (sort of), if not quite personified, then puppetified.
I found a picture through Yahoo!, which you can view here.
Frankly I'm a little disappointed. The monster looks like a big green man, wearing a suit. He has a two-headed man--one Bush head, one Gore head--under his power, and he has a big, leering grin. I guess he looks evil. But he also looks sort of spindly, sickly even, as though it wouldn't be that hard to stomp him. Somehow I've always thought of Corporate Greed Monster as being a little hardier. Maybe you had to be there.
As a footnote to this brief musing on the aesthetics of the Greed Monster, I'll note that the most popular protest photo among visitors to Yahoo!'s news site does not involve that monster at all but instead features the arrest of a man in a pig suit. The caption studiously avoids any pigs-arrest-pig jokes. If you like the idea of applying market theory to everything, you might want to visit the Yahoo! feature that tracks which news stories and photos have been e-mailed the most times. When I looked shortly after lunch time, the handcuffed pig picture had been e-mailed 186 times. A half-hour later the total was up to 191.
Reader Comments from The Fray:
Too bad the protestors went with such a pathetic, washed-out effigy. There already is a readily identifiable personification of corporate greed, but perhaps nobody thought to ask Matt Groenig for permission to use C. Montgomery Burns. Or maybe they did, and he was afraid that associating Burns with that hapless gaggle of "progressive" airheads might degrade the image of The Simpsons.
--Stephen Skubbina
(To reply, click here.)
(8/15)
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Can't Go Wrong With A Cheeseburger, Area Man Reports
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:21 -0400 - Courageous E-mail To Boss In Drafts Folder Since December
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0400 - Novak Hits Pedestrian With Corvette
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:00:45 -0400 - » More from the Onion
| Pundits and diplomats respond.
Robinson: Sunshine in BerlinToles: Obama the UniterTelnaes: Meanwhile, McCain
- Froomkin: How to Get Away With Torture
- Milbank: (Not an) Impeachment Hearing
- Achenblog: My Bias Against Media Bias
- Krauthammer: Maliki Votes for Obama
- Today's Headlines
- Poll: Hispanic Voters Back Obama by Wide Margins
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:04:26 GMT - Opinion: Germans See Themselves in Obama
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:53:52 GMT - How the Mosley Orgy Ruling Could Affect U.K. Media
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:59 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Over the Rainbow: Angie and Jo
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:21:23 GMT - The New Tavis Smiley, Beware!
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:27:58 GMT - Go for the Bronze
Fri, 25 July 2008 4:18:27 GMT - » More from The Root

moneybox









