HOME / moneybox: Daily commentary about business and finance.

Is Cheney's Business Career a Qualification for Office?

Dick CheneyYou might think that a guy who has presided over a big company for five years, during which that company's share price doubled, might want to bring that up if he were running for public office. Not Dick Cheney. "Eight years ago," he said in his speech at the Republican convention last night, "when I completed my years as secretary of defense, I loaded a U-Haul truck and drove home to Wyoming. ... Lynne and I settled into a new private life. There was time for fishing and grandchildren, and we were content."

Yes. In addition, there was time to build a personal net worth in the tens of millions of dollars, which is probably another source of contentment. I was disappointed that Cheney's summation of his qualifications for the office of vice president omitted any mention of or even allusion to Halliburton, the oilfield services company where he has served as chief executive officer for half a decade. ("Home" is now Texas, by the way, but presumably Dallas-based Halliburton took care of the move from Wyoming, so he didn't have to hassle with a U-Haul again.) (Say, what was Cheney doing loading that U-Haul, anyway? A man with his health history ought to leave the heavy lifting to someone else, no?)

I was disappointed because I've had a hard time figuring out from press accounts just what kind of CEO Cheney was. "He's done a very good job," one analyst commented to CBS Marketwatch.com, the day before Cheney's selection was announced. "Probably to his credit, he has had Dave Lesar"--the company's president and chief operating officer, who has since been anointed Cheney's successor--"basically managing the day-to-day operations of Halliburton. If Mr. Cheney were to leave, Lesar could step in and replace him and there would be no negative to Halliburton."

Well, what does that mean? Maybe the company should have made me the new CEO of Halliburton, because to my credit, I would have continued to let Dave Lesar basically manage the day-to-day operations. I'd have been willing to do it for, oh, half of the $1.9 million salary Cheney earned last year.

Cheney started at the top at Halliburton--a company that provides big oil companies with equipment for exploration and for the actual pumping of oil out of the ground--in 1995. He managed get the job with hardly any business experience, apparently by impressing the firm's prior CEO during a fly-fishing trip. An upbeat assessment of Cheney's Halliburton stint in the Times recently described his subsequent role as "Halliburton's outside man, a globe-trotting rainmaker." Another stock analyst explained to the Associated Press, "What Dick does at that company is personally make high-level strategic decisions, sets broad policies and provides access to national oil companies who have an impact on contracting of oilfield services."

He ends up sounding like more of an ambassador than a CEO, but apparently he was quite good at it: In addition to his cash salary, he has piled up Halliburton shares worth somewhere north of $51 million. (A report in Forbes.com also figures that his directorships at Procter & Gamble, EDS, and Union Pacific, have brought him at least another $1 million in fees and stock.)

And his tenure hasn't been bad for shareholders so far. The company's stock was at $21 a share when he arrived and at about $41 when he announced his pending departure (that's a bit off a 52-week high of $52 and, as it happens, slightly lags the S&P 500 index over the same five-year period). On the other hand, the same analyst who praised Cheney's "high-level strategic decisions" adds that it will take another couple of years to gauge Cheney's legacy. Shortly after Cheney's announcement, the company made public its second-quarter numbers, which showed a decline in profits from $83 million to $75 million compared with same quarter in 1999. (Still, this was slightly better than analysts had figured.)

So apparently the conventional wisdom is that we can draw two conclusions from the Cheney era at Halliburton. First, he did a great job. And second, he won't be missed. Obviously it's going to be tough to believe both of those things indefinitely. Perhaps our old friend the market offers a clue: Since news of Cheney's resignation, HAL shares are up about 15 percent.

Photograph of Dick Cheney by Gary Hershorn/Reuters.

Print This ArticlePRINTEmail to a FriendE-MAILShare This ArticleRECOMMEND...Get Slate RSS FeedsRSS
Rob Walker writes the Ad Report Card for Slate.
COMMENTS

Reader Response from The Fray:


Why is Rob Walker the only journalist to point out the extreme unlikelihood that Dick Cheney packed and drove a U-Haul from DC to Wyoming when he left his post as Secretary of Defense? Let's see, which size U-Haul is best for packing up a nine-bedroom mansion in McLean--would that be the 10-footer or the fifteen-footer? Did he get his boxes from the grocery store on Sunday night, or did he buy them from U-Haul at the marked-up, let's-gyp-the-desperate-guy rate? Did he call up James Baker and Brent Scowcroft? "Hey, guys, I'm movin' on Saturday--there's a six-pack and a pizza with your names on it if you'll be at my place around ten."

The American people demand a full investigation into this highly improbable, and seemingly mendacious, claim. Or at least I do. Gore: Here's your red meat. Get on it, man!

--C.J.Aguilar

(To reply, click here.)


Rob Walker writes:

Perhaps our old friend the market offers a clue [to Cheney's record as CEO]: Since news of Cheney's resignation, HAL shares are up about 15 percent.

The 15 percent rise could indicate that the market believes Halliburton will be better off without Cheney. Just as plausibly, though, the market could be cheering the prospect of easy access to the White House.

--Ro Amembal

(To reply, click here.)


Overall--fair assessment. At least he didn't get paid $650M per year like the Computer Associates Inc CEO and lose millions in the process! Anyway, often senior government executives and military officers enter the private sector based on their known leadership skills and access to influential leaders in both government and industry. For example, Secretary Cheney wasn't hired because of his knowledge of the technical aspects of say exploring for oil in Pakistan, but on his strategic view of whether or not it is wise to seek access in this country--in other words his geo-political knowledge of Pakistan. General Powell brought leadership and visibility to Volunteer America, not his technical knowledge of the order of battle or Sun Tzu's On War philosophy.

--Phil Henning

(To reply, click here.)


Cheney passed one of the tests of a good CEO, because he had a capable replacement. It's called succession planning, and successful organizations are good at it.

Why should Cheney even need to mention his Halliburton tenure? He had enough qualifications to be president based on his experience even before he joined Halliburton, what was it, 5% of an entire century ago. Whew! That's a long time?

--BD

(To reply, click here.)


To BD:

Excellent figuring! I hope you didn't have to pull out the calculator to do it! We should calculate the importance of everything this way.
Presidential term = 4% of a century = trivial!
Pregnancy = 0.75% of a century = trivial!
Vacation = 0.04% of a century = trivial!
Lifetime = 75% of a century = trivial!
With this new perspective, I no longer need to mention anything.

--I'm Being Frank

(To reply, click here.)

[Fromchgo meanly said: "Please do the 'no longer need' thingy. For me, for the gipper. Forever." He was sternly told off by rwilly, who does not like sarcasm, even if "most of the letters to Slate fail to make valid arguments towards any point." Oh.--Fray Editor]

(8/8)

What did you think of this article?
Join The Fray: Our Reader Discussion Forum
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES
TODAY'S PICTURES
TODAY'S CARTOONS
TODAY'S DOONESBURY
TODAY'S VIDEO
The end of Prohibition.58/091204_TP.jpg
Cartoonists' take on Tiger Woods.37/091204_TC.jpg
The gee word.1/122939/2183724/DoonesburyPlaceholder.jpg