Slate's Bizbox
ballot box: Politics and policy.

McCain's Selective Outrage

Jacob Weisberg
Posted Tuesday, Feb. 29, 2000, at 3:33 AM ET

You have to admire John McCain's guts. Going to Virginia Beach, the home of Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network, to denounce the religious right is about as ballsy a move as we're likely to see in Republican politics in this lifetime. It was a pungent, Sister Souljah moment. But once you get done being impressed by McCain's cojones, you have to wonder a bit about his coherence. To denounce the "agents of intolerance" while standing next to Gary Bauer might be the act of a hero. It's definitely not the act of an intellectual or moral purist.

"Political intolerance by any political party is neither a Judeo-Christian nor an American value," McCain said this morning. "The political tactics of division and slander are not our values."

This was eloquently worded, as was the entire speech. But you might ask what kind of "intolerance" McCain is talking about. When it comes to the only variety that social conservatives express openly these days--intolerance of gays--Bauer is just as guilty as Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson, the two social conservatives McCain criticized by name. In fact, Bauer may be worse. Last October, Falwell invited Mel White, an openly gay minister who ghostwrote Falwell's autobiography in the 1980s, to speak at his Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Va. Bauer's organization, the Family Research Council, decried the visit. In a statement issued at the time, the organization asserted that it "continues to have concerns about meetings of this nature." In a similar vein, Bauer recently asserted that the decision by a Vermont court to allow gay marriage was "worse than terrorism." Pat Robertson sounds tame by comparison. The worst thing he has said recently is that homosexuals are big in Scotland. The worst thing Falwell has said is that Tinky Winky looks like one of them.

The oddest moment in McCain's speech was the blanket amnesty he granted to a few favored social conservatives in addition to Bauer. "Chuck Colson, head of Prison Fellowship, is saving men from a lifetime behind bars by bringing them the good news of redemption," McCain asserted. "James Dobson, who does not support me, has devoted his life to rebuilding America's families."

It's clear why McCain exempted Dobson. Dobson has been Bauer's mentor and sponsor. Dobson's organization, Focus on the Family, has been the chief financial supporter of Bauer's organization, the Family Research Council. Though there was something of a rift between Dobson and Bauer after Bauer declared his presidential candidacy, Bauer is eager to mend it. It's a fair surmise that Bauer asked McCain to give Dobson a pass in his indictment as a personal favor. But in granting this favor, McCain undercut his otherwise compelling thesis. Dobson, whose efforts to "rebuild" families includes efforts to "cure" homosexuals, is even harder to defend than Bauer. A couple of years ago, Dobson threatened to lead a right-wing walkout from the Republican Party because Tom DeLay and Dick Armey are too moderate for his taste.

What's more, Dobson has slandered McCain personally. When Bauer endorsed McCain, Dobson issued a nasty statement, attacking McCain in bitter and personal terms. "McCain ... has sought and received enormous financial and political support from the Log Cabin Republicans and other homosexual activists," Dobson said. "The senator is being touted by the media as a man of principle, yet he was involved with other women while married to his first wife, and was implicated in the so-called Keating scandal with four other senators. ... The senator reportedly has a violent temper and can be extremely confrontational and profane when angry. These red flags about Senator McCain's character are reminiscent of the man who now occupies the White House," Dobson concluded. Robertson and Falwell have been both milder and more substantive in their criticisms of McCain.

This is not McCain's first burst of selective outrage. All the time he has been blasting away at George W. for visiting Bob Jones University without protesting its policies, McCain has been giving a free ride to the man who was his most valuable ally in South Carolina, Rep. Lindsey Graham. Graham accepted an honorary degree from Bob Jones himself. When Brit Hume pointed out this inconvenient fact while Graham was denouncing Bush's visit to Bob Jones on Fox News Channel, Graham used the same defense Bush gave before he changed his mind and apologized to Cardinal O'Connor: Lots of other Republicans did the same thing before everyone suddenly woke up one day and decided it was unacceptable. "I was invited to go, I went, and I'll accept responsibility for going," Graham said. "People like Strom Thurmond and Bob Dole have gone."

In other words, McCain's problem isn't with all "agents of intolerance" trying to exert influence within the Republican Party. It's just with the agents of intolerance who don't happen to be helpful John McCain.

Print This ArticlePRINTDiscuss this in The FrayDISCUSSEmail to a FriendE-MAIL
Share on FacebookPost to MySpace!Share with MixxDigg ThisShare with RedditShare with del.icio.usShare with FurlShare with Ma.gnolia.comShare with SphereShare with Stumble Upon
Jacob Weisberg is editor-in-chief of the Slate Group and author of The Bush Tragedy.
Join the Fray: our reader discussion forum
What did you think of this article?
POST A MESSAGE | READ MESSAGES

Highlights from The Fray:


Just because someone endorses you, doesn't mean you endorse them. The idea is that Bauer is a Christian with integrity - even if you don't ascribe to every one of his views. The fact that he disagrees, yes disagrees, with John McCain on many issues makes even more emphatic the point that he truly believes in McCain's integrity - even to the level of risking his own political neck against the establishment of the religious right. McCain didn't ask for his endorsement. And it doesn't make McCain "intolerant" because he was endorsed by Bauer. Rather, it shows that the remarkable character that McCain possesses was enough to overcome the narrow, and yes intolerant, pressures of the Christian Coalition.

--John Calene

(To reply, click here.)


To John Calene:
You think John McCain did not ask Gary Bauer for his endorsement? Just like any candidate, McCain has an active endorsement solicitation program. He's asking everyone he can to "join us". And giving Gary Bauer's endorsement some type of noble virtuous motive is silly. Very frequently, what drives a losing candidates desire to endorse is that they're mad at the other candidate ... the concept of "my enemy's enemy is my friend".

--juliemarg

(To reply, click here.)



McCain is smarter than people think. He at least seems to realize that he is not going to be nominated without shaking up the GOP's reliance on the Christian coalition for a strong voting block. Although Christian conservatives are formidable allies, they have become a liability to the GOP in that they scare away potential GOP voters with their intolerance and bigotry. The Christian conservatives have helped the GOP in electing candidates in individual states, but they will not put someone in the White House because it is simply a fact that the country does not want to go in the direction of more fear, intolerance, bigotry, and inability to respect individual freedom and choice. McCain is smart for pushing this issue because he is waging a war within the GOP and forcing them to see McCain as more popular, mainstream, and electable than GW.

--J. Patino

(To reply, click here.)


I hope all of those Bush-bashers who have been delightfully hanging the twin albatrosses of Bob Jones and Pat Robertson around W's neck are enjoying Weisberg's new crusade here in Ballot Box: demonstrating McCain's hypocrisy. Negative campaigning on non-issues "works" for a while, but it always spirals out of control. Instead of comparing candidates on the issues, we now comb over every association each candidate has and we saddle that candidate with every statement or action the associate ever made. Every organization a candidate chooses as a venue now is fair game for findings of untoward activity which we can denounce the candidate for not denouncing. A new Republican phenomena has taken hold: "boldly" going in front of an audience to renounce its beliefs or leaders, which really is just a new form of pandering to another audience. Sister Souljah, come home, all is forgiven. When the new president takes the oath of office, I'm glad we'll know where he stands on Bob Jones, the Confederate flag in SC, Pat Robertson, and Gary Bauer. Those positions will help him deal with a bellicose China, the unraveling in Kosovo, the challenge of healthcare, and managing the surplus.

--Will

(To reply, click here.)

(2/29)

Washington Post
The Washington Post
OPINIONS
A Grand Tour
David Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon