The SimpsoffsHell, d'oh, Bart must go.

Reader Comments From The Fray:





[Notes from the Fray Editor: Readers were outraged. Zac Johnson, below, practically accuses Seth Stevenson of being a chubby guy with a faint mustache. John's post "Cancel Seth Stevenson" was so deeply unfair and mean that we are not featuring it (or only this part: "Much of his writing process is probably outsourced to Asia anyway… Seth could concentrate quality into a few final columns…"). And there were many other posts which were shocked at the very idea of canceling the show. One reader said if it went "I will sit on my couch like a lazy fool, and be forced to do my homework." And in a low blow, SP quotes some dialogue from the show: "Let's put it on the Internet!" Bart: "NO, we have to reach people whose opinions actually matter."



A comment from Fray star Tony Adragna produced a very wide-ranging argument--starts here. And Sammie Woodfin makes an unusual analogy: "Think of The Simpsons as a beautiful super model that is slowly growing older and losing perfection quite rapidly. Do you kill the super model immediately? Or do you just let nature take its own course?" (Apparently the answer is Save the Simpsons, though after reading another "Culturebox" article, we think perhaps Bart will get some magazine covers).]





I agree that it's time to cancel The Simpsons, but not for the reasons given in the article. Part of the greatness of the show was its initial subversiveness. Bart became the poster child for bad behavior everywhere. But lately, The Simpsons has become just another half hour family values morality play. Like every other sitcom, it seems, it always has to wrap up with a moral. TV entertainment has become a means of sugar coating morality medicine for the masses; The Simpsons was refreshing because it didn't do that. Not any more, unfortunately; it's joined King of the Hill as one of the leading moral messengers on TV.



--Vic Riley



(To reply, click here.)





It may have been Samuel Johnson who asserted he was always pleased to hear of a poet dying "for then I can be sure of having all of him on my shelf". That reason ("closure", if you like) is about the only one that would make me agitate for cancelling The Simpsons. On all other grounds, I say let Fox keep churning it out. If future episodes go downhill, I don't have to watch them. Even if they turn to complete crap, it will not tarnish the brilliance of what has come before. At least, not for me.



If you insist on judging The Simpsons as a complete opus, that's a different story. But it's taking the suspension of disbelief a bit too far, I think, if a few "worst episodes ever" seriously diminish your enjoyment of the rest.



--Tony Prentakis



(To reply, click here.)





The Simpsons is still the funniest show on television. Any time a group of Simpsons fanatics get together (chat rooms, conventions, rehab) there is always the chubby guy with the faint mustache who proclaims last Sunday's was the "Worst Episode Ever" and bemoans the loss of Conan O'Brien/John Schwartzwelder/(Insert name here) and proclaims that the show is a mere shadow of itself, acting as if they've made some sort of scientific breakthrough. The fact is, that when that huge tree came crashing through Kentucky Fried Panda and Homer screamed "NO!!! It was finger Ling-Ling good", that's some fine television, full of bizarre spark and genuine comedy. For shame Seth Stevenson, for you know not of which you speak.



--Zac Johnson



(To reply, click here.)



(2/12)

• Froomkin: How to Get Away With Torture
• Milbank: (Not an) Impeachment Hearing
• Achenblog: My Bias Against Media Bias
• Krauthammer: Maliki Votes for Obama