culturebox
columns
- The Soiling of Old Glory
The photograph that captured Boston's busing crisis: How it was taken, and why it still matters.
Louis P. Masur
posted April 10, 2008 - It's Me in That 9/11 Photo
Walter Sipser was in that picture Frank Rich wrote about. Here's what he thinks of Rich's column.posted Sept. 13, 2006 - It Takes a Horse
How America became obsessed with Barbaro.
Meghan O'Rourke
posted June 1, 2006 - Fight Snub
How Cinderella Man sucker punches the Jewish boxer Max Baer.
David Fellerath
posted June 2, 2005 - Towering Babel
A new translation makes the mighty author stoop.
Alex Abramovich
posted Oct. 29, 2001 - Search for more culturebox articles
- Subscribe to the culturebox RSS feed
- View our complete culturebox archive
Abandonment 101
Judith ShulevitzPosted Monday, March 15, 1999, at 12:08 PM ET
Why do men leave? People ask that question a lot in this family-values era, but the answer given by pop and evolutionary psychologists, "difference" feminists, and activists in the anti-divorce movement alike--that men have an innate fear of commitment and an irresistible urge to fuck around--doesn't answer much.
It was only a matter of time before men would feel the need to defend themselves. Hanif Kureishi's Intimacy, a novel, is the interior monologue of a man on the verge of abandoning his longtime lover and their children. John Taylor's Falling: The Story of One Marriage, a memoir, recounts the story of one father's marriage and divorce. Intimacy is a slim book with a single idea: Jay, a successful screenwriter in London, justifies his decision to leave Susan, an officious woman who rebuffs his advances with remarks about his personal inadequacies. Falling is a fat and digressive book, filled with descriptions of nature and memories of childhood and mundane details of marital strife.
Falling is also inordinately dull. Why that's so, however, is strangely interesting. Taylor perorates around the one thing we really want to know, which is why his marriage fell apart. Why did Taylor resist all efforts to save it, even though he appears to be in love with his wife and realizes the harm to his daughter? He is unable to characterize his own motivations, although he does recite the circumstances: 1) His wife was unhappy because she was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in her mid-30s; 2) she went stir-crazy raising their daughter; 3) he took lovers; 4) he remained only out of a sense of duty, a fact he made cruelly clear to her.
Intimacy 's Jay also sidesteps the core issue, with greater economy if a shocking amount of aggression. What went wrong with his relationship, exactly? He makes Susan out to be such a hateful snob that we can't imagine why he settled down with her. And it's hard to credit his belief that a few bouts of intense, sporadic sex with the ex-mistress he is leaving Susan to chase after are likely to blossom into emotional fulfillment. It is probably not a coincidence that in a book called Intimacy, the narrator seems unacquainted with the concept. Only his happily married friend Asif (as if!) seems to have a sense of it: "You remind me of someone who only ever reads the first chapter of a book," he tells Jay. "You never discover what happens next."
Here are two books that ought to have met a pressing social need--to testify on men's behalf in the face of the forces that seek to condemn them. But instead, Taylor and Kureishi (or Jay, anyway) beg the key question: What allows a person to feel one thing one day and another thing the next? Each narrator hints that the relationship's disintegration was the woman's fault and tries to leave it at that. This is both implausible and morally unsatisfying, since it represents a refusal to deal with the essential conundrum of why they hooked up with such fundamentally flawed people in the first place.
It may be unfair to demand high levels of self-awareness from anybody, male or female, especially on questions of love, the most perplexing in all of human psychology. On the other hand, explaining the seemingly inexplicable is precisely what good literature ought to do. Taylor's and Kureishi's insufficiencies may be more of literary skill than of the male character. Let's hope abler informants come along soon.
--Judith Shulevitz
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- [audio] Hewlett-Packard Introduces New Soup-Resistant Laptop
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:00:09 -0400
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:00:27 -0400- Queen Elizabeth II Announces She's Pregnant Again
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:00:00 -0400 - » More from the Onion
A Grand TourDavid Broder | While the stars align for Obama, McCain is looking like the odd-man-out on foreign policy.
Annette Heuser: A Honeymoon
- David Ignatius: Middle East Peace for Dummies
- Robert Novak: Scandal at the Pentagon
- Dana Milbank: Sorry We Asked, Sorry You Told
- Jamie Barnett: Defending Our Values
- Today's Headlines
- Democrats Ignore Mukasey Plea for New Gitmo Law
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:17:16 GMT - John Mellencamp Tackles Race, Politics in New Album
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:44:03 GMT - Readers Fired Up By Teen-Pregnancy Issue
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:30:57 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Burden of Proof
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:06:08 GMT - Obama in Berlin
Tue, 22 July 2008 15:20:11 GMT - When Thugs Cry
Wed, 16 July 2008 18:25:58 GMT - » More from The Root

culturebox









