explainer
columns
- Can Bug Spray Explode?
The hazards of aerosol insecticides.
Amaka Maduka
posted July 25, 2008 - How Healthy Are Truckers?
What it takes for a commercial driver to pass the government physical.
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 24, 2008 - How Do You Diagnose Autism?
Michael Savage thinks doctors are getting it wrong.
Juliet Lapidos
posted July 22, 2008 - Pre-emptive Presidential Pardons
Can you be pardoned for a crime before you're ever charged?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 21, 2008 - What's a Bank Run?
And how do you get on the FDIC's secret problem list?
Jacob Leibenluft
posted July 18, 2008 - Search for more explainer articles
- Subscribe to the explainer RSS feed
- View our complete explainer archive
Is Medical Use of Marijuana Legal or Not?
Bruce GottliebPosted Thursday, Nov. 12, 1998, at 9:25 PM ET
Last Tuesday, five states voted to legalize the medical use of marijuana. One day later, Federal Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey pointed out that medical use of marijuana remains illegal. Huh?
Alaska, Arizona, Oregon, Nevada, and Washington changed their state laws, as California did two years ago. But federal law has not changed--it's still illegal for anyone, including patients, to possess marijuana. So when your state says yes and the United States says no, who wins? An entire branch of legal scholarship is devoted to questions of "Federalism" like this one. Since the Civil War, though, the answer is almost always that the federal government wins. It's conceivable that a state could forbid medical marijuana if the federal government allowed it, but inconceivable that the states could overrule a federal prohibition.
So why bother changing state law?
Two reasons. First, most small-scale drug prosecutions occur at the state (or local) level. Changing state law puts the state out of the business of investigating and prosecuting people who no longer are violating state law. Federal prosecutors may pursue these cases, but federal law enforcement resources are small by comparison and generally devoted to bigger fish.The practical consequence is that no one is likely to prosecute patients holding small quantities of reefer.
On the other hand, federal officials in California have shut down several "marijuana clubs," that grow weed and sell it to patients. And it's possible that federal authorities might deputize state officials, allowing them to prosecute under federal law. But Newsweek reports that federal authorities aren't interested in prosecuting any but the largest of these "clubs," which brings us to the second reason the state laws matter.
Medical marijuana referenda can send a message to federal politicians about popular attitudes. With last Tuesday's vote, one-fifth of America's citizens live in states which have approved medical marijuana legislation.
Next question?
feedback | about us | help | advertise | newsletters | mobile
User Agreement and Privacy Policy | All rights reserved
- Today's Headlines
- Can't Go Wrong With A Cheeseburger, Area Man Reports
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:00:21 -0400 - Courageous E-mail To Boss In Drafts Folder Since December
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:00:05 -0400 - Novak Hits Pedestrian With Corvette
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:00:45 -0400 - » More from the Onion
| Pundits and diplomats respond.
Robinson: Sunshine in BerlinToles: Obama the UniterTelnaes: Meanwhile, McCain
- Froomkin: How to Get Away With Torture
- Milbank: (Not an) Impeachment Hearing
- Achenblog: My Bias Against Media Bias
- Krauthammer: Maliki Votes for Obama
- Today's Headlines
- Poll: Hispanic Voters Back Obama by Wide Margins
Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:04:26 GMT - Opinion: Germans See Themselves in Obama
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:53:52 GMT - How the Mosley Orgy Ruling Could Affect U.K. Media
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:59 GMT - » More from Newsweek
- Today's Headlines
- Over the Rainbow: Angie and Jo
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:21:23 GMT - The New Tavis Smiley, Beware!
Tue, 22 July 2008 16:27:58 GMT - Go for the Bronze
Fri, 25 July 2008 4:18:27 GMT - » More from The Root

explainer









