Slate -> The Fray -> Viewing Profile: Joe

enter the fray: our reader discussion forum

The Fray

Viewing Profile: Joe_JP

About

Advanced

User: Joe_JP
Recent Posts

"no appropriation of Money ... longer Term than two years"

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 9, 2009 Views: 68 Replies: 1

Topic: "no appropriation of Money ... longer Term than two years" Rating: +1
Last response by Philadelphia Steve on December 11, 2009
Re: As you point out

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 10, 2009 Views: 16 Replies: 1

Topic: "no appropriation of Money ... longer Term than two years" Rating: +1
Last response by Philadelphia Steve on December 11, 2009
Re: They still were

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 10, 2009 Views: 5 Replies: 1

Topic: "no appropriation of Money ... longer Term than two years" Rating: +1
Last response by Philadelphia Steve on December 11, 2009
Religion is touchy in part because it's so easily simplified

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 10, 2009 Views: 56 Replies: 0

Topic: Religion is touchy in part because it's so easily simplified
Last response by Joe_JP on December 10, 2009
Re: did dahlia sleep throught moussaoui trial ?????

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 7, 2009 Views: 30 Replies: 0

Topic: did dahlia sleep throught moussaoui trial ????? Rating: +1
Last response by MarcusAurelius on December 10, 2009
Adam Liptak on Sotomayor's First Opinion

Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by Joe_JP on December 9, 2009 Views: 15 Replies: 0

Topic: Adam Liptak on Sotomayor's First Opinion
Last response by Joe_JP on December 9, 2009
Re: The Circular Reasoning about rights

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 34 Replies: 1

Topic: The Circular Reasoning about rights
Last response by the true conservative on December 8, 2009
violation of rules of war

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 13 Replies: 0

Topic: The Circular Reasoning about rights
Last response by the true conservative on December 8, 2009
Independent ACORN Report Finds No Illegal Conduct

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 8, 2009 Views: 23 Replies: 1

Topic: Independent ACORN Report Finds No Illegal Conduct
Last response by gringo_911 on December 8, 2009
Sotomayor Alert

Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by Joe_JP on December 7, 2009 Views: 12 Replies: 1

Topic: Sotomayor Alert
Last response by Joe_JP on December 8, 2009
Her first opinion

Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by Joe_JP on December 8, 2009 Views: 8 Replies: 0

Topic: Sotomayor Alert
Last response by Joe_JP on December 8, 2009
Deciphering?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009 Views: 37 Replies: 1

Topic: Imprisonment without trial
Last response by DBuss on December 8, 2009
Re: Deciphering?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009 Views: 20 Replies: 1

Topic: Imprisonment without trial
Last response by DBuss on December 8, 2009
Re: Deciphering?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009 Views: 13 Replies: 2

Topic: Imprisonment without trial
Last response by DBuss on December 8, 2009
because people don't know what "abortion" is?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 29, 2009 Views: 56 Replies: 1

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
Curious logic

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 29, 2009 Views: 15 Replies: 1

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
Informed choice

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 29, 2009 Views: 13 Replies: 1

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
The baby is "born" by all your scenarios (eom)

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 29, 2009 Views: 13 Replies: 0

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
Viability is ability to survive w or w/o an incubator (eom)

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 29, 2009 Views: 14 Replies: 0

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
You allege an intent that is not shown

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 29, 2009 Views: 24 Replies: 1

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
Re: Curious logic

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009 Views: 15 Replies: 0

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
Re: Damn its frustrating

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009 Views: 29 Replies: 0

Topic: Mandated sign reads: Babies killed before birth. Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 7, 2009
John Brown

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 7, 2009 Views: 34 Replies: 0

Topic: John Brown
Last response by Joe_JP on December 7, 2009
Rule 303 isn't very workable in real life either

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009 Views: 24 Replies: 1

Topic: The Constitution is not a suicide pact...
Last response by trapdoor on December 7, 2009
Re: It must be nice

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009 Views: 12 Replies: 0

Topic: It must be nice Rating: -1
Last response by bsharporflat on December 7, 2009
DOJ Defends Yoo (or You Got To Be Kidding Me)

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009 Views: 171 Replies: 1

Topic: DOJ Defends Yoo (or You Got To Be Kidding Me)
Last response by Gatewood on December 6, 2009
Let's get real here

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009 Views: 10 Replies: 0

Topic: DOJ Defends Yoo (or You Got To Be Kidding Me)
Last response by Gatewood on December 6, 2009
Sorta

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009 Views: 6 Replies: 1

Topic: DOJ Defends Yoo (or You Got To Be Kidding Me)
Last response by Gatewood on December 6, 2009
Re: No; many of them now

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009 Views: 7 Replies: 1

Topic: DOJ Defends Yoo (or You Got To Be Kidding Me)
Last response by Gatewood on December 6, 2009
Re: Oh it's not me. It's

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009 Views: 21 Replies: 1

Topic: DOJ Defends Yoo (or You Got To Be Kidding Me)
Last response by Gatewood on December 6, 2009
Lithwick and Bazelon On Panel

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009 Views: 23 Replies: 0

Topic: Lithwick and Bazelon On Panel
Last response by Joe_JP on December 6, 2009
First ... they WILL see the courtroom ...

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009 Views: 74 Replies: 2

Topic: First ... they WILL see the courtroom ...
Last response by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009
PS

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009 Views: 16 Replies: 0

Topic: First ... they WILL see the courtroom ...
Last response by Joe_JP on December 5, 2009
Pain in butt = failing kids because of her love life

Posted to Television by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 41 Replies: 0

Topic: The wrong message
Last response by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009
Re: The wrong message

Posted to Television by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009 Views: 11 Replies: 0

Topic: The wrong message
Last response by Joe_JP on December 4, 2009
I'm going with "yes"

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 33 Replies: 1

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
(4) None of the Above

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 12 Replies: 2

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: (4) None of the Above

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 8 Replies: 0

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: (4) None of the Above

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 6 Replies: 1

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: KSM WAS extradicted

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 17 Replies: 1

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: (4) None of the Above

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009 Views: 6 Replies: 0

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: On what Ceded Powers' grounds

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009 Views: 7 Replies: 1

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Ceded Powers

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009 Views: 36 Replies: 0

Topic: Has he read the 6th Amendment?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Kind of not like Kelo

Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 225 Replies: 1

Topic: Kind of not like Kelo
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: Kind of not like Kelo

Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009 Views: 11 Replies: 0

Topic: Kind of not like Kelo
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: OK Which is it?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 20 Replies: 1

Topic: OK Which is it?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: OK Which is it?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009 Views: 6 Replies: 1

Topic: OK Which is it?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
PS

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009 Views: 18 Replies: 0

Topic: OK Which is it?
Last response by Joe_JP on December 3, 2009
Re: Judicial questions

Posted to Supreme Court Dispatches by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 17 Replies: 0

Topic: Judicial questions Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009
"Fair enough"

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 111 Replies: 2

Topic: "Fair enough" Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 2, 2009
PS

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 15 Replies: 0

Topic: "Fair enough" Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 2, 2009
Re: The problem is

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 16 Replies: 1

Topic: "Fair enough" Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 2, 2009
Re: bills of attainder

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 9 Replies: 1

Topic: "Fair enough" Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 2, 2009
Re: In which case why

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 2, 2009 Views: 19 Replies: 1

Topic: "Fair enough" Rating: -1
Last response by degsme on December 2, 2009
Re: compare this to the ACORN uproar

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009 Views: 40 Replies: 0

Topic: compare this to the ACORN uproar Rating: +2
Last response by Philadelphia Steve on December 2, 2009
you brought it up (eom)

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 30, 2009 Views: 12 Replies: 0

Topic: compare this to the ACORN uproar Rating: +2
Last response by Philadelphia Steve on December 2, 2009
Re: ACORN gamed taxpayers

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 30, 2009 Views: 11 Replies: 0

Topic: compare this to the ACORN uproar Rating: +2
Last response by Philadelphia Steve on December 2, 2009
I think the critics want "really fair."

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 18 Replies: 0

Topic: Close enough? Rating: +1
Last response by degsme on December 2, 2009
Re: Originalism: The Framers as God

Posted to Books by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 27 Replies: 1

Topic: Originalism: The Framers as God Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009
Re: Originalism: The Framers as God

Posted to Books by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009 Views: 14 Replies: 0

Topic: Originalism: The Framers as God Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on December 1, 2009
Why is it a great show? (eom)

Posted to Television by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 37 Replies: 0

Topic: The Suite Life on Deck is a GREAT SHOW!!
Last response by Grungie on December 1, 2009
Re: The Suite Life on Deck is a GREAT SHOW!!

Posted to Television by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 30 Replies: 1

Topic: The Suite Life on Deck is a GREAT SHOW!!
Last response by Grungie on December 1, 2009
Re: How about Creator?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 38 Replies: 1

Topic: How about Creator? Rating: -1
Last response by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009
Re: How about Creator?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009 Views: 24 Replies: 0

Topic: How about Creator? Rating: -1
Last response by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009
Jesus Christ v. Allah

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009 Views: 123 Replies: 1

Topic: Jesus Christ v. Allah Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009
Re: Jesus Christ v. Allah

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 36 Replies: 1

Topic: Jesus Christ v. Allah Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009
Re: Jesus Christ v. Allah

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009 Views: 26 Replies: 0

Topic: Jesus Christ v. Allah Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on November 28, 2009
“arrogance cloaked as humility"

Posted to Books by Joe_JP on November 26, 2009 Views: 113 Replies: 1

Topic: “arrogance cloaked as humility" Rating: +1
Last response by oxboggle on November 28, 2009
Larimore Promotes Fiction

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 455 Replies: 1

Topic: Larimore Promotes Fiction Rating: +3
Last response by DBuss on November 26, 2009
So?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 38 Replies: 1

Topic: That pesky Declaration of Independence.
Last response by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009
Re: So?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 28 Replies: 1

Topic: That pesky Declaration of Independence.
Last response by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009
Re: That pesky Declaration of Independence.

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 29 Replies: 0

Topic: That pesky Declaration of Independence.
Last response by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009
Re: So?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009 Views: 47 Replies: 1

Topic: That pesky Declaration of Independence.
Last response by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009
Re: So?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 25 Replies: 1

Topic: That pesky Declaration of Independence.
Last response by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009
Re: So?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 39 Replies: 0

Topic: That pesky Declaration of Independence.
Last response by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009
Re: The Truth v. The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 22 Replies: 0

Topic: The Truth v. The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth Rating: +3
Last response by la savante on November 25, 2009
Re: The Truth v. The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 25, 2009 Views: 26 Replies: 0

Topic: The Truth v. The Whole Truth and Nothing But the Truth Rating: +3
Last response by la savante on November 25, 2009
Crime? Giuliani disagrees

Posted to Prescriptions by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 26 Replies: 1

Topic: Legal to buy milk?
Last response by BenK on November 25, 2009
Re: Legal to buy milk?

Posted to Prescriptions by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 30 Replies: 1

Topic: Legal to buy milk?
Last response by BenK on November 25, 2009
Flag Burners

Posted to Books by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009 Views: 155 Replies: 0

Topic: Flag Burners
Last response by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009
Re: "Allah" IS sectarian in an English-language setting

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 38 Replies: 1

Topic: "Allah" IS sectarian in an English-language setting Rating: +2
Last response by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009
Sect of Arabs?

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 24 Replies: 1

Topic: "Allah" IS sectarian in an English-language setting Rating: +2
Last response by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009
Assumptions

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 19 Replies: 1

Topic: "Allah" IS sectarian in an English-language setting Rating: +2
Last response by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009
Re: Assumptions

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 31 Replies: 0

Topic: "Allah" IS sectarian in an English-language setting Rating: +2
Last response by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009
Christ

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009 Views: 45 Replies: 0

Topic: "Allah" IS sectarian in an English-language setting Rating: +2
Last response by Joe_JP on November 24, 2009
Interesting stuff

Posted to Moneybox by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 30 Replies: 0

Topic: Has China changed so much?
Last response by Monster Ballads Suq on November 24, 2009
Re: sit com stupid

Posted to Television by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 29 Replies: 0

Topic: sit com stupid
Last response by bsharporflat on November 23, 2009
still be far better than any of the available alternatives

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 19, 2009 Views: 286 Replies: 3

Topic: still be far better than any of the available alternatives
Last response by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009
The "status quo" was him in Gitmo with a military commission

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 19, 2009 Views: 22 Replies: 0

Topic: still be far better than any of the available alternatives
Last response by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009
Re: still be far better than any of the available alternatives

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 20, 2009 Views: 32 Replies: 0

Topic: still be far better than any of the available alternatives
Last response by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009
Re: The "show trial" concept is not as narrow as you've tried

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 16 Replies: 1

Topic: still be far better than any of the available alternatives
Last response by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009
Re: I admit I got a tad political with the "not putting America

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 53 Replies: 0

Topic: still be far better than any of the available alternatives
Last response by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009
Re: As usual an incurious judicial mind...

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 44 Replies: 1

Topic: As usual an incurious judicial mind... Rating: +2/-3
Last response by flrdalyn on November 23, 2009
Re: As usual an incurious judicial mind...

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 26 Replies: 1

Topic: As usual an incurious judicial mind... Rating: +2/-3
Last response by flrdalyn on November 23, 2009
Re: As usual an incurious judicial mind...

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 23, 2009 Views: 26 Replies: 1

Topic: As usual an incurious judicial mind... Rating: +2/-3
Last response by flrdalyn on November 23, 2009
Movies Focusing On The Wrong Character

Posted to Movies by Joe_JP on November 20, 2009 Views: 403 Replies: 1

Topic: Movies Focusing On The Wrong Character Rating: +1/-1
Last response by MarcusAurelius on November 23, 2009
Re: Movies Focusing On The Wrong Character

Posted to Movies by Joe_JP on November 20, 2009 Views: 48 Replies: 1

Topic: Movies Focusing On The Wrong Character Rating: +1/-1
Last response by MarcusAurelius on November 23, 2009
Re: Movies Focusing On The Wrong Character

Posted to Movies by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 38 Replies: 0

Topic: Movies Focusing On The Wrong Character Rating: +1/-1
Last response by MarcusAurelius on November 23, 2009
A tricky wicket that Hamilton handled fairly enough

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009 Views: 235 Replies: 0

Topic: A tricky wicket that Hamilton handled fairly enough Rating: +1
Last response by Joe_JP on November 22, 2009
Re: Martyrdom and the death penalty

Posted to Jurisprudence by Joe_JP on November 21, 2009 Views: 50 Replies: 0

Topic: Martyrdom and the death penalty
Last response by Joe_JP on November 21, 2009

User: Joe_JP Recent Posts

User: Joe_JP
Recent Posts