Tomorrow, the House will vote on a resolution
from Rep. Tom Rooney, R-Fla., to "limit the use of funds" that can be spent on the kinetic military action in Libya. And the word is that it might pass. Would it die in the Senate? Sure: The game there is on a weaker resolution coming from John Kerry and John McCain. But Rooney's resolution isn't a pure "defund the war" measure, either. It includes
The limitation on funds under subsection (a) does not apply with respect to—
(1) search and rescue;
(2) intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance;
(3) aerial refueling; and
(4) operational planning.
It suggests, as a lot of the talk around this suggests, that opposition to what's going on in Libya is only partly about the war and the Constitutionality of it; it's about Congress getting the run-around from the White House as the operation's conducted. That's been a stupid mismanagement on the White House's part, and it's created critics out of would-be supporters.
"What's the message to the White House?" said Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., a critic of the way the White House has handled this. "I'm trying to figure that out. There's a desire to enforce the War Powers Resolution."
TODAY IN SLATE
The Right Target
Why Obama’s airstrikes against ISIS may be more effective than people expect.
The One National Holiday Republicans Hope You Forget
It’s Legal for Obama to Bomb Syria Because He Says It Is
I Stand With Emma Watson on Women’s Rights
Even though I know I’m going to get flak for it.
Should You Recline Your Seat? Two Economists Weigh In.
It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
Or, why it is very, very stupid to compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice.
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.