on Chicago's Lake Shore Drive yesterday as the city was walloped by a near-record 20.2 inches of snow. Hang on: 20.2 inches? That's it? Didn't Silver Spring, MD, get more than that just last year?
The Chicago Tribune, in its excitement over what passes for historic snowfall in Chicago, posted a
the city has ever seen:
1. 23.0 inches on Jan. 26-27, 1967
2. 21.6 inches on Jan .1-3, 1999
3. 20.2 inches on Feb. 1-2, 2011
4. 19.2 inches on March 25-26, 1930
5. 18.8 inches on Jan. 13-14, 1979
Aww! Twenty-three whole inches. Here, for comparison, are the
for my native Baltimore—a city whose citizens are always mocking themselves for how easily they panic over winter storms, as un-hardy residents of the mid-Atlantic:
1. 26.8 inches (Feb. 16-18 2003)
2. 26.6 inches (Jan. 7-9, 1996)
3. 26.5 inches (Jan. 27-29, 1922)
4. 25.0 inches (Feb. 5-6, 2010)
5. 22.8 inches (Feb. 11, 1983)
That's right: Baltimore has beaten Chicago's worst snowstorm three times in the past 15 years alone. If it had happened in Baltimore, the Second City's current whopping snowfall would have just squeaked past the Washington's Birthday storm of 1979 for eighth place.
Basically, when you hear someone from Chicago say "record-breaking snowfall," that's what we on the East Coast call "last winter."
TODAY IN SLATE
How Canada’s Shooting Tragedies Have Shaped Its Gun Control Politics
Where Ebola Lives Between Outbreaks
Gunman Killed Inside Canadian Parliament; Soldier Shot at National Monument Dies
Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band
Can it be again?
Paul Farmer: Up to 90 Percent of Ebola Patients Should Survive
Is he right?
“I’m Not a Scientist” Is No Excuse
Politicians brag about their ignorance while making ignorant decisions.
Driving in Circles
The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.