Gap Replaces Boring, Soulless Logo With Even More Boring and Soulless Logo

A blog about politics, sports, media, stuff
Oct. 8 2010 11:37 PM

Gap Replaces Boring, Soulless Logo With Even More Boring and Soulless Logo

Everyone is complaining about the Gap replacing its old logo . The newest logo is awful, sure. It looks like the emblem of some failed low-fare spinoff of a major airline. But that thing it replaced, the white letters on the blue square? That's not the old Gap logo.

This is the old Gap logo. (Thanks to Jordan Ellenberg for the reminder.)

Advertisement

Why are people nostalgic for the dull, totalitarian, khakis-will-conquer-the-world Gap emblem of the '90s? It's like being nostalgic for C+C Music Factory .

The new Helvetica look is boring and fake. It comes from the company's "1969 Jeans" branding, which—have another look at the picture of the original store: the Gap didn't even make jeans in 1969. It advertised itself as a Levi's retailer.

But the new logo is the spiritual heir of the earlier blue square. In 1969, the Gap wanted to look like it was in step with the times. Since then, its new logos have aimed to look timeless—that is, like they're in step with nothing at all.

Tom Scocca is the managing editor of Deadspin and the author of Beijing Welcomes You: Unveiling the Capital City of the Future.

  Slate Plus
Working
Nov. 27 2014 12:31 PM Slate’s Working Podcast: Episode 11 Transcript Read what David Plotz asked a helicopter paramedic about his workday.