The Citizen's Guide to the Future

Sept. 19 2014 6:31 PM

The One Big Problem With the Enormous New iPhone

As I stood in line at my local AT&T store Friday morning, preparing to plunk down $399 on Apple’s next big thing, a fear crept into my thoughts: What if the iPhone 6 Plus is too big to fit into my pants pocket? Am I going to have to start carrying a purse?

This, of course, is not a novel problem. Half the smartphone-buying population has been grappling with it stoically for years, because the pockets on women’s clothing tend to be Lilliputian. Only with the growing popularity of “phablets” like the 6 Plus and the Samsung Galaxy Note, however, has the pocket-or-purse dilemma begun to affect men. Predictably, we’re freaking out.

Advertisement

As it turned out, however, I had no problem sliding the iPhone 6 Plus into the pockets of my Uniqlo chinos. One of my colleagues, whose sartorial taste skews toward elfin hipster jeans, had somewhat more difficulty when he tried my new phone on for size. I'm guessing he'll opt for a smaller version.

Yet just as I began to rejoice that I hadn’t wasted my money on a phone I couldn’t carry, a different drawback became apparent: There’s no easy way to use the device with just one hand.

Over the years, I’ve grown blithely accustomed to the notion that operating a smartphone is a single-handed endeavor. Not only can I comfortably cradle the iPhone 5 in my palm, but the tips of my fingers have no trouble reaching the farthest corners of the screen. I’ve even mastered the art of swatting home runs one-handed on my favorite little time-wasting mobile game, 9 Innings Pro Baseball.

No more. Just typing in your passcode to unlock the 6 Plus requires either a second hand or a feat of manual acrobatics. Reaching the top buttons on the home screen—you know, trivial things like “messages,” “photos,” and “camera”—is out of the question, unless you’re Kawhi Leonard.

When Apple announced the 6 Plus, I noted that it had included a feature that allows you to pull the top buttons halfway down the screen by double-tapping the home button. I did not anticipate that I would quickly come to rely on this feature for almost everything I need to do on the phone.

Opening my Gmail app and composing a message used to require just three actions:

  1. Tap to open the app
  2. Tap the “compose” button
  3. Start typing

Now it requires the following finger dance:

  1. Double-tap the home button to bring the Gmail app within reach
  2. Tap to open the app
  3. Double-tap the home button to bring the compose button within reach
  4. Tap the “compose” button
  5. Start typing

That might sound like a small difference. If you use your phone a lot, it isn’t. It nearly doubles the amount of time it takes to complete certain tasks. And while the double-tap feature makes it relatively easy to reach the top of the screen, it remains a struggle to reach the sides without dropping the device altogether. Two of the people I to whom I briefly loaned the phone managed to fumble it within the first 30 seconds.

iPhone 6 next to iPhone 5S
This is how far my thumb can reach on the iPhone 5 (left) and on the iPhone 6 Plus (right).

Photo by Lily Newman / Slate

The obvious solution is simply to use two hands at all times. I get that. The 6 Plus works beautifully in landscape mode, and its spacious screen shines when it comes to reading articles, watching videos, or playing games. Its battery life, reputed to be significantly longer than that of the iPhone 6, was a major selling point for me. Like the Galaxy Note, this is a phone that some people will love even as others mock and eschew it. I have a feeling that my father, who happily sported a bulky Handspring Treo at a time when everyone else was buying Motorola Razrs, will be a fan.

Unlike the Galaxy Note, however (or the Treo, for that matter), the 6 Plus doesn’t come with a stylus, and it wasn’t explicitly marketed as a compromise between a phone and a tablet. No Galaxy Note buyer should be surprised to find that her device is ungainly. Apple addicts, on the other hand, may have been lulled by the company’s marketing to believe that it would never sell them a phone that didn’t feel Mama Bear’s–chair perfect in their palms.

A device that requires two hands is a device that demands your full attention. It’s not a device you can whip out of your pocket and glance at quickly in between other tasks. It’s not a device you can use to quickly scan your email while carrying a grocery bag or hanging onto a subway pole. And perhaps that was Apple’s intention all along: An awkwardly sized phone might be just the incentive some people need to buy a $350 smartwatch.

I’m not ruling out the possibility that I’ll eventually grow dexterous enough with the 6 Plus that its virtues begin to overshadow its limitations. But at this point, I’m also not ruling out the possibility that I’ll be back in line at that same AT&T store within two weeks to exchange it for something more manageable.

Previously in Slate:

Video Advertisement

Sept. 19 2014 5:03 PM

White House Chief Information Officer Will Run U.S. Ebola Response

At first glance, White House IT oversight and the fight against Ebola seem like slightly ... different missions. But Steve VanRoekel, who is currently the White House chief information officer, is switching roles to bring his tech expertise to the government’s Ebola control initiatives.

VanRoekel, who worked at Microsoft for 15 years before transitioning into government work in 2009, will coordinate Ebola programs at the U.S. Agency for International Development. A White House official told Politico that VanRoekel will be a senior adviser to USAID Administrator Rajiv Shah.

Advertisement

Shah says that VanRoekel has successfully worked with USAID in the past to improve efficiency. VanRoekel brings with him to USAID his extensive experience developing nascent technologies, plus familiarity with Big Data and open data. He said in a statement, “Technology is not the solution to this extremely difficult task but it will be a part of the solution and I look forward to partnering with our Federal agencies, non-profit organizations and private sector tech communities to help accelerate this effort.”

Politico points out that technology has already played a positive role in fighting the virus. The CDC has been distributing an outbreak-tracking app to field workers, and an automated data analysis tool has been helping to model and predict disease transmission. According to a new Vanity Fair piece, earlier in the outbreak the CDC “rushed to complete a computer program it had been developing to track outbreaks; the program needed to be translated into French so it could be used in Guinea.”

Deputy administrator Lisa Schlosser will become interim CIO until the Obama administration can replace VanRoekel.

According to the World Health Organization, there have been 2,622 deaths from Ebola in West Africa, with more than 5,335 cases reported.

Sept. 19 2014 11:40 AM

Apple Invented the Perfect Way to Handle Your Giant New Phone

People are lining up all over the world to get their hands on the new iPhone 6 and 6 Plus. But once they have these large new devices, where will they put them? Apple has the answer in a new product that’s nothing short ... of revolutionary.

Sept. 18 2014 6:48 PM

By 2100 the World's Population Could Be 11 Billion

It's difficult to forecast how the world's population will change in the next hundred years or so. Some researchers think it could decline, and others say there's nowhere to go but up. A new study published today in Science sides with the latter camp, forecasting that by 2100 the human population will have increased to between 9.6 and 12.3 billion.

The research, which was led by the United Nations and University of Washington, comes to similar conclusions as a 2013 report by the group. Both this new study and the one from 2013 used advanced statistical modeling on life expectancy and fertility data to narrow the U.N.'s previous range of estimates for the population in 2100. The U.N. prediction was formerly 7 billion to about 17 billion—a range that's too large to really be helpful. But the 2013 study brought the forecast to between 9 billion and 13 billion. Today's findings narrow the range further to a spread of 2.7 billion.

Advertisement

Most of the growth is forecast to be in Africa, where the current population of 1 billion is predicted to grow to 4 billion by 2100. The study cites large family size and lack of access to birth control as factors that may contribute to the sharp rise. But it also notes that family planning initiatives and better access to contraception could reduce the increases the researchers are predicting both in Africa and worldwide.

The study also openly disputes a common belief that the world population will plateau around 9 billion by 2050. The researchers wrote, "Analysis of these data reveals that, contrary to previous literature, world population is unlikely to stop growing this century."

Sept. 18 2014 5:43 PM

Oracle’s Larry Ellison Steps Down, Will Be Replaced by Hurd’n’Catz

Oracle’s Larry Ellison is stepping down as CEO … and, presumably, onto the deck of one of his famous yachts.

CNBC reports that the world’s fifth wealthiest person announced his resignation on Thursday, “effective immediately.” He’s not sailing into the sunset just yet, though: Ellison, 70, will stay on for the time being as executive chairman and chief technology officer.

Advertisement

Bizarrely, he will be replaced by not one but two new CEOs, and apparently their names are Herding Cats. Just kidding, their names are Hurd and Catz.

Mark Hurd and Safra Catz, who had been serving as the company’s presidents, will not be co-CEOs, CNBC clarifies. Rather, both will be named CEO. This may or may not end well.

Ellison’s unexpected departure marks a new tack for the Silicon Valley company that he-cofounded in 1977 and has led ever since. He built Oracle from a startup focused on relational-database software into a 120,000-employee multinational corporation focused on, well, relational-database software, but also some other types of hardware and software and, you know, business-y stuff.

Safra Catz and Mark Hurd
New Oracle CEO Safra Catz (left) and new Oracle CEO Mark Hurd (right).

Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Over the years the brash Ellison has been a mainstay atop various lists of the world’s richest people, highest-paid CEOs, and most humongous boats. Last year the U.S. sailing team he sponsored won the America’s Cup in a comeback that stirred the hearts of seafaring folk and plutocrats worldwide.

Earlier this year Ellison’s lavish means of transportation made waves when the Wall Street Journal reported that he employs a guy in a powerboat to follow along behind his yacht and retrieve his errant basketball shots.

It will be interesting to see how Hurd’n’Catz fare in his place at the helm of a mature software company that remains profitable but faces challenges to its database dominance and is playing catch-up in the cloud.

At least we need not fear that Ellison’s departure will create a controversy vacuum at the top. Hurd brings to the table a checkered history from his time as chairman of Hewlett-Packard, where he resigned amid allegations of sexual harassment by a former reality TV actress.

Previously in Slate:

Sept. 18 2014 5:03 PM

Bono, Apple Creating "Irresistible" Music Format. Prepare to Buy the White Album Again.

Uh-oh. Here we go again.

According to Time magazine, Apple is working with U2 on a “secret project” aimed at ensuring that we’ll all pay for the music we listen to in the future. Says the magazine, U2 frontman and doer of good works Bono “hopes that a new digital music format in the works will prove so irresistibly exciting to music fans that it will tempt them again into buying music—whole albums as well as individual tracks.”

Advertisement

Gee, I never lost the temptation to buy music. I admit I don’t buy as much as when I was in my 20s and playing music for a living. And I also gladly admit that I sometimes listen to “pirated” works online before deciding whether to make the actual purchase.

But when I saw Time’s breathless story, I flashed back to a scene from the wonderful aliens-on-Earth comedy from the late 1990s, Men in Black. Tommy Lee Jones’ character, explaining a device confiscated from visiting aliens, says it’ll replace the CD. “Guess I’ll have to buy the White Album again,” he adds in one of the great throwaway lines in film history—a line that resonated deeply with everyone who was then over the age of, say, 30.

We all knew from experience what the music industry’s game had become, in a significant way: persuade or force us to pay, again and again. Vinyl LPs, 8-track tapes, cassette tapes, CDs: Every new format had its convenience over previous ones, but we were expected to repurchase what we already owned. With tapes, we could make copies even though the music industry insisted that wasn’t proper. With CDs, we were stuck, especially when vinyl LPs were discontinued. Ditto DVDs when VCRs faded away. That’s a good business if you can get away with it.

CDs didn’t sound as good as an LP on an excellent audio system, at least to many people’s ears. But they had the huge advantage of allowing easy conversion to an MP3 format that we could rip to our computers and other devices, and play to our hearts’ content without risking damage to the original.* They also fueled the first round of file-sharing (Napster, RIP.) and also launched pure panic in the Copyright Cartel. The music, film, publishing, and software industries, among others, are fine with digital distribution as long as they can devise ways to absolutely control it—and never mind the damage this does to society overall.

What, then, could possibly be so “irresistibly exciting” to music fans that we’d be willing to be conned—sorry, persuaded—to buy again? Here’s what might do it for me: a digital format that recaptured the richness of vinyl sound at the highest possible fidelity. Then again, my hearing has suffered over the years, almost certainly due to the live-music days. Maybe this “irresistibly exciting” format wouldn’t make enough difference to my enfeebled ears. For many music lovers, however, it might well be a good thing.

But this irresistible format also sounds like it wants to revisit an era that should be dead and buried: when music companies put DRM, or “digital rights management”—a misnomer since the expression really should be “digital restrictions management”—on the files to prevent us from playing them in any manner, or on any device, not specifically permitted by the seller. DRM is how Apple persuaded the industry to join the then-revolutionary iTunes ecosystem, but over the years, thanks in part to DRM-free competition from Amazon, this customer-controlling technology all but disappeared from our digital music files, at least the ones we could download or rip, and DVDs are still copy-protected by a system that’s been widely broken.

Which is why the Copyright Cartel is moving us as fast as possible toward a world where we own absolutely nothing, not even a physical CD. They want us to be renters, period. If this irresistible format isn’t largely being designed with that in mind—based on streaming from “cloud” servers—I’ll be amazed. In their new venture, Bono and Apple—the latter has become the tech industry’s most control-freakish company—are apt partners.

Time’s latest coverage of Apple and Bono may be a high-water mark in obsequious worship, and one sidebar includes this amazing passage:

But releasing the album free to iTunes subscribers does not mean the band has given the album away. “We were paid,” Bono tells TIME. “I don’t believe in free music. Music is a sacrament.”
Amen.

Amen? Really, Time? Every note anyone plays should generate money? That'll be news to people (like me) who play in their living rooms, or at school, or in community centers, or jam sessions, or the countless other venues where so many of us play for the joy of it.

And while I’m not a Catholic, when did people start paying for sacraments? Is that another 21st-century business model?

*Correction, Sept. 18, 2014: This post originally misstated that CDs come with MP3 files. They don't come with MP3 files, but the songs can be easily ripped and converted to MP3s.

Sept. 18 2014 4:26 PM

Global Oceans Break All-Time Heat Record; World on Pace for Warmest Year Ever

The Earth’s oceans have never been this far beyond the bounds of normal.

New data released Thursday by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration showed that Earth’s oceans reached a level last month not seen since humans have been keeping comprehensive records. Global ocean temperatures in August 2014 warmed to “the largest departure from average for any month on record” according to a NOAA statement. The previous record was set just two months ago, in June 2014.

Advertisement

Records date back to 1880, though there’s ample evidence that the new record hasn’t been matched in much longer than that.

Climate scientists took the news with a sense of foreboding:

The NOAA data also showed the temperature of the Earth as a whole hit a new all-time August record last month, confirming similar results earlier this week from NASA and the Japanese Meteorological Agency, which use slightly different ways of crunching the numbers.

Additionally, the combined temperature of June, July, and August was also unprecedented in historical records. According to the JMA, four of the last five months have now been record-breaking for that particular month. (July was No. 2, just a hair behind the super-charged El Niño year of 1998.) The eastern United States is among the only land areas on Earth still running below normal for 2014, a legacy of the polar vortex outbreaks of earlier this year.

Later Thursday morning, NOAA expanded on the implications of the new records in a conference call, saying that on its current pace—and with the help of a newly resurgent El Niño—2014 is poised to become the warmest year ever measured.

“If the next four months rank among the five warmest on record, 2014 will be the warmest on record for the globe,” said Jake Crouch of the National Climatic Data Center.

The warming effect of El Niño, which boosts temperatures in the tropical Pacific Ocean, appears to have begun finally kicking into gear over the last week or so. In a separate announcement Thursday, the International Research Institute for Climate and Society declared that “borderline El Niño conditions have now returned in both ocean and atmosphere.” The El Niño is expected to persist until at least March 2015, affecting a range of weather patterns around the globe over the coming months.

Should 2014 become the new warmest year, a lingering El Niño means the record may not last long.

“Having an El Niño would increase the chances of 2015 at least starting out much warmer than average, and approaching record or near record warmth,” said Crouch.

The news came just days before a planned march in New York City, which organizers expect to be the largest ever mass demonstration on global warming in the world. More than 100,000 people are expected to attend, including U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon.

Sept. 18 2014 2:39 PM

Here's How to Keep Apple From Sharing Your iPhone Data With the Police

With the release of Apple Pay and the recent celebrity photo leak from iCloud, Apple is making an effort to shore up its privacy reputation. Tim Cook published a letter this week pointing out that Apple doesn’t try to capitalize on your data (the way Google, Facebook and others do), and there’s a new dedicated privacy subsection of the Apple website. But if actions speak louder than words, the measure that seems most convincing is a change in iOS 8's encryption that will keep Apple itself out of your business.

In the new mobile operating system, all you have to do is add a passcode (which you should already have anyway!) to opt in to encryption that denies Apple special access to your data. Apple announced on Wednesday night that even if it gets a warrant from law enforcement for your data, it will be unable to comply if you have this encryption enabled.

Advertisement

In the wake of NSA spying revelations, tech companies felt a backlash when it became clear that they were forking over user data to U.S. law enforcement without much resistence. By locking personal data down so companies themselves can't access it, they sidestep the issue of whether or not to comply, and avoid being accused of obstructing justice.

As the Washington Post explains, the difference in iOS 8 is that adding a passcode automatically opts users in to the new encryption. In previous versions of iOS, Apple maintained some backdoors into passcode-protected devices. In the company's new privacy section, it says:

On devices running iOS 8, your personal data such as photos, messages (including attachments), email, contacts, call history, iTunes content, notes, and reminders is placed under the protection of your passcode. Unlike our competitors, Apple cannot bypass your passcode and therefore cannot access this data. So it's not technically feasible for us to respond to government warrants for the extraction of this data from devices in their possession running iOS 8.

Since iOS adoption rates tend to be high, it won't be long before Apple has very little access to devices running iOS. Whatever you're texting about, Apple won't be the one to rat you out.

Update, September 18, 2014, 4:30 p.m.: Now Google is announcing that its next Android release, currently in beta and codenamed L, will have options for enabling encryption that prevents Google from accessing personal data on an Android device. As with Apple's iOS 8 announcement, this decision means that Google will not be able to comply with law enforcement requests for user data when that user has the encryption enabled. In a statement to the Washington Post, Google also noted that many Android devices have had this capability since 2011. But now the company will surface it more prominently and make it ubiquitous so more users can take advantage of it.

Sept. 18 2014 12:46 PM

The World Is Warming. So Why Is Antarctic Sea Ice Hitting Record Highs?

For four days in a row this week, sea ice surrounding Antarctica has broken all-time records. But—get this—the ice is expanding, not shrinking.

It’s the third consecutive year that the icebergs that surround the continent have expanded into unseen territory. What the heck is going on? Didn’t Antarctica get the climate change memo? Isn’t polar ice supposed to be melting?

extent_s_running_mean_F17_regular
As long as humans have been keeping track, there’s never been this much sea ice surrounding Antarctica. What gives?

Figure: University of Bremen

Advertisement

First, let’s distinguish between sea ice and land ice. Since sea ice floats in the ocean, its growth or melt doesn’t affect global sea levels. Antarctic land ice, on the other hand, does contribute to sea level rise, and it’s losing volume at a record pace. In fact, a frightening study earlier this year found that a key glacier in West Antarctica has entered an inevitable, slow-motion collapse phase, with dire consequences for the world’s coastal cities. A follow-up study last month for the first time put an upper bounds on the impacts of melting Antarctic glaciers in our children’s lifetimes.

The Antarctic (a cold continent surrounded by a warm ocean) is the geographic opposite of the Arctic (a warming ocean surrounded by cold continents). That difference, along with the fact that our economy is based on planet-warming fossil fuels, has allowed Arctic sea ice to dramatically decline in recent years, at a rate of about 4 percent per decade. At the other end of the world, Antarctic sea ice has been increasing at a fraction of that pace, less than 1 percent per decade.

It seems weird, but like this winter’s epic polar vortex outbreaks in North America, this week’s record-breaking Antarctic sea ice could be a further sign of global warming. Even though there's been more ice, the Southern Ocean is warming, not cooling. One theory says that warmer ocean waters are more effective at melting the tongues of Antarctic land ice glaciers that stick out into the sea. The resulting excess of freshwater raises the freezing point of the surrounding salt water, allowing more ice to form.

Southern_Ocean_Temp
Not only is the ocean around Antarctica warming, it’s warming at a rate faster than the rest of the world’s oceans. So why is there a record amount of ice?

Figure: Zhang 2007, Journal of Climate

Another theory is that the winds that encircle Antarctica are growing stronger, in part due to the hole in the ozone layer, and pushing ice farther and farther away from the continent, allowing additional ice to take its place closer to Antarctica’s frozen shores. This theory is favored by the British Antarctic Survey, and a number of recent papers have backed it up.

A third theory is that since warmer air can hold more water vapor, it’s likely that there’s more rain and snow falling over the Southern Ocean. That too could decrease the ocean’s salinity near the surface, boosting sea ice levels.

The reality is probably some combination of the above. After all, there’s still a lot of legitimate debate among scientists on this topic. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the leading global authority on climate change science, admitted as much in its latest report, which was released last year. New evidence shows the Antarctic sea ice trend itself may have been overestimated because of a statistical fluke.

Eventually, scientists expect the sheer temperature increase from global warming to swamp whatever complex combination of atmospheric and oceanographic physics that’s producing the counterintuitive ice growth, and Antarctic sea ice will begin to decline as Arctic ice already has.

By the end of the week, Antarctic sea ice will probably set yet another record. Just remember, it’s definitely not because Antarctica (or any other large swath of the planet) is getting colder.

Sept. 17 2014 9:00 PM

Amazon Is Now a Gadget Company

Seven years ago, Amazon released its first gadget, the Kindle. An instant hit, it helped pave the way for the tablets of the future. But while Amazon produced successors to the Kindle, it didn’t follow up with a full-fledged tablet of its own until late 2011, a year-and-a-half after Apple announced the iPad. And it wasn’t immediately clear whether the Kindle Fire, with its attractive price but mediocre quality, would have staying power.

As recently as a year ago, it was fair to say that Amazon was still “dabbling” or “experimenting” in the consumer electronics business. Not anymore.

Advertisement

On Wednesday, Amazon announced not one, not two, but six new devices: four Kindle Fire tablets and two Kindle e-readers. Not one is revolutionary. Each is either a successor or a variation on some device that has come before. But each appears to be a worthy competitor in its category, and at least a couple of them appear to set new bars in quality-to-price ratio.

Throw in Amazon’s new smartphone and set-top box, and you have a product line whose range and quality is beginning to rival that of the world’s leading consumer electronics companies.  Heads up, Samsung and Apple: Amazon is not messing around.

Kindle Fire HDX 8.9"
The new Kindle Fire HDX 8.9" starts at $379.

Image courtesy of Amazon

The flagship of Amazon’s new line is a new Kindle Fire HDX 8.9-inch tablet. At $379, it’s the finest of Amazon’s hardware offerings—but maybe also the least interesting. Yes, it’s 20 percent lighter than the iPad Air, boasts a snappy processor and high-resolution display, and comes with perks like Dolby Atmos surround sound, a first for a tablet. Watch Transformers on it, and your senses will be as thoroughly assaulted as Michael Bay intended. It also pairs nicely with an ultra-thin Bluetooth keyboard and comes with some interesting software features, like Firefly, that Amazon first introduced earlier this year with its quixotic Fire Phone. In short, the new HDX looks like a worthy follow-up to its predecessor, but nothing scintillating in the scheme of things.

Amazon Kindle Fire HD
At $99, the Kindle Fire HD 6" is priced more like a toy than a tablet.

Image courtesy of Amazon

More intriguing are a trio of new low-end offerings, starting with the Fire HD 6” and Fire HD 7” tablets. At $139, the 7-incher is the same price as its predecessor, which was already extremely cheap for a tablet. But at $99, the 6” Fire HD’s price is almost eye-popping. It’s the price that a lot of industry watchers were hoping for way back when Amazon introduced the first Kindle Fire three years ago. Amazon couldn’t pull it off then, but apparently it can now.

It came about, Amazon vice president Peter Larsen explained, because Amazon saw that a lot of people were buying sub-$100 tablets on its website. But those tablets, by and large, haven’t gotten very good reviews. Among other problems, customers complain that their cheap tablets are poorly constructed, break easily, run slowly, and sound tinny. Amazon sought to address those issues with its Fire HDs, which offer crisp, high-definition displays, peppy processors, Gorilla Glass screens and sturdy frames that don’t break when you drop them.

More importantly, at $99, the Fire HD 6” is priced more like a toy than a computer, which is refreshing at a time when Apple and Microsoft are making tablets that soar past the $500 and creep toward $1,000. Some might even be tempted to buy one just for their kids—which is where Amazon’s fourth new tablet, the Fire HD Kids Edition, comes in.

Fire HD Kids Edition
If your kid breaks the Amazon Fire HD Kids Edition, Amazon will replace it for free.

Image courtesy of Amazon

The Kids Edition, which is a variant of the Kindle Fire HD that uses the same hardware, actually starts at $149 for the 6” version, not $99. But Amazon more than justifies the extra cost. First, the Kids Edition comes with a bulky, brightly colored case that keeps the tablet safe from all kinds of drops and spills. But Amazon also recognizes that kids are quite resourceful when it comes to ruining things—and so it throws in a 2-year “no-questions-asked” warranty. “If they break it, we’ll replace it,” Amazon pledges. Do your worst, kiddos.

On top of that, the tablet comes with a year’s subscription to FreeTime Unlimited, a sort of Amazon Prime for rugrats that offers free access to a wide library of children’s content. And it has built-in settings that block access to the Amazon stores and in-app purchases, so your 4-year-old can’t surprise you with hundred-dollar presents while your back is turned. The Kids Edition also makes it easy to set time limits on the kids’ usage of the tablet, or to require that they complete certain educational tasks before they can play games.

Kindle Voyager
The $199 Kindle Voyage is pricey for an e-reader.

Image courtesy of Amazon

Finally, there are two new Kindle e-readers. Devices with grayscale screens that do little more than display text aren’t as exciting in 2014 as they were in 2007, of course. But Amazon has managed to keep the Kindle line relatively fresh with incremental improvements that hold value for bibliophiles, if not Michael Bay fans. At $199, the new Kindle Voyage is pricier than you’d expect for an e-reader, but appears to offer about the best reading reading experience you can get anywhere (outside of, you know, an actual book). Ultra-thin, with a razor-sharp display and an adaptive front light that automatically adjusts the brightness to match that of the room, it’s really a niche device aimed at Kindle addicts with money to spare. It comes with free 3G data service, so you can download books even without Wi-Fi.

Finally, the new base Kindle comes with a touchscreen at last. At $79, it’s the price of a few hardbacks.

With the exception of its e-readers, Amazon has yet to dominate any of the hardware categories it has entered. And its first foray into phones looks like it could be a straight-up flop. But with Wednesday’s new releases, its tablets now appear to be right up there with those of Samsung, Apple, and Google. And the Fire TV already vies with the best set-top boxes. In short, Amazon is now a viable consumer electronics company, in addition to being an online megastore, a cloud services provider, a television studio, and all the other things that Amazon has become.

What makes Amazon so dangerous as a hardware company is that it doesn’t have to make money on its hardware. What was true of the original Kindle remains true of all the company’s Kindles and Kindle Fires today: More than gadgets, they're gateway drugs for all the other stuff you can buy on Amazon. Only now the gateway drugs are getting pretty addictive in their own right.

Previously in Slate:

READ MORE STORIES