The Climate Litigation Danger

Slate's blog on legal issues.
April 17 2008 12:04 PM

The Climate Litigation Danger

In his speech yesterday on climate change, Bush made one good point among many other not-so-good points:

/blogs/convictions/2008/04/17/the_climate_litigation_danger/jcr:content/body/slate_image

As we approach this challenge, we face a growing problem here at home. Some courts are taking laws written more than 30 years ago -- to primarily address local and regional environmental effects -- and applying them to global climate change. The Clean Air Act, the Endangered Species Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act were never meant to regulate global climate. ...

Decisions with such far-reaching impact should not be left to unelected regulators and judges. Such decisions should be opened -- debated openly; such decisions should be made by the elected representatives of the people they affect.

Advertisement

Several federal district judges have made a similar point in the course of dismissing tort suits based on global warming.  In these suits, people whose lives have been affected by adverse weather conditions of various sorts, argue that energy companies, by contributing to global warming, have caused the harm and ought to pay them damages.  Rather than addressing the scientific basis of these claims, the judges have pointed out that climate change is an international problem and judges are powerless to develop a sensible approach to address that problem.  They lack expertise, but, more important, they have no power to compel Chinese and Indian polluters to reduce their emissions.  Successful tort suits would raise the cost of greenhouse-gas emitting activities in the United States, but in an ad hoc way that does not address the problem effectively, and would interfere with negotiations between the United States and other countries.

If these judges are correct, their logic applies to agency regulation as well, and it is wrong to criticize the EPA for failing to aggressively regulate greenhouse-gas emissions under the Clean Air Act and other environmental statutes.  The EPA can probably do a better job of developing standards than courts can, but it is still hampered by its limited jurisdiction (effective climate regulation must apply to all major sources of emissions), its limited remedial tools (it has no power, for example, to levy a tax on carbon emissions), and its lack of power to regulate industries in foreign countries.  Court or agency-generated regulation of greenhouse gases in the absence of a climate treaty that binds all major economies will have little impact on the overall problem, while producing costs, with one particularly bad scenario being that of polluting industries migrating from the United States to countries with weaker regulations, and exporting goods back to Americans.  Whatever the merits of its legal position in ongoing litigation (see David Barron on this issue ), the EPA has good reasons to hold off regulating until a climate treaty and implementing legislation have been put into place.

Eric Posner, a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, is author of The Twilight of International Human Rights Law. Follow him on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

History

The Self-Made Man

The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.

The GOP Senate Candidate in Iowa Doesn’t Want Voters to Know Just How Conservative She Really Is

Does Your Child Have “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo”? Or Is That Just a Disorder Made Up to Scare You?

Why Indians in America Are Mad for India’s New Prime Minister

The Strange History of Wives Gazing at Their Husbands in Political Ads

Television

See Me

Transparent is the fall’s only great new show.

Building a Better Workplace

You Deserve a Pre-cation

The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.

Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.

Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD

The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
Moneybox
Sept. 30 2014 12:04 PM John Hodgman on Why He Wore a Blue Dress to Impersonate Ayn Rand
  News & Politics
Jurisprudence
Sept. 30 2014 2:36 PM This Court Erred The Supreme Court has almost always sided with the wealthy, the privileged, and the powerful.
  Business
Building a Better Workplace
Sept. 30 2014 1:16 PM You Deserve a Pre-cation The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.
  Life
Education
Sept. 30 2014 1:48 PM Thrashed Florida State’s new president is underqualified and mistrusted. But here’s how he can turn it around.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 30 2014 11:42 AM Listen to Our September Music Roundup Hot tracks from a cooler month, exclusively for Slate Plus members.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 30 2014 2:56 PM How Faithful Is David Fincher’s Gone Girl?
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 30 2014 2:38 PM Scientists Use Electrical Impulses to Help Paralyzed Rats Walk Again
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 30 2014 7:30 AM What Lurks Beneath the Methane Lakes of Titan?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 28 2014 8:30 PM NFL Players Die Young. Or Maybe They Live Long Lives. Why it’s so hard to pin down the effects of football on players’ lives.