Will To Power

Slate's blog on legal issues.
March 20 2008 11:22 PM

Will To Power

George Will touched a nerve among conservatives today.  In his new column , he called for judicial intervention to thwart local regulations limiting dancing at a restaurant, in the name of the Fourteenth Amendment.  This embrace of judicial activism certainly didn't please my friends Matt Franck , Ed Whelan , or Steve "Feddie" Dillard .

Steve and Ed seemed a bit surprised by Will's position; I must say, though, that I find it fairly consistent with Will's prior writings.  Will's view of the role of the courts is no different from his view of the role of government generally his primary concern is that government  should minimize interference with personal liberty (particularly on matters of speech).  At the same time, he he opposed judicial disruptions of well-established societal institutions.  (Thus, when the Supreme Court ruled in the VMI case, he famously decried "our robed masters." )  Can these two priorities come into conflict?  Of course.  I've not seen Will wrestle with that point.

Advertisement

Even though (or perhaps because) his own instincts are less-than-systematic, Will loves to pick fights with conservatives on questions of the role of the judiciary.  He is not a fan of "originalism"; he associates it with the Dred Scott decision and the Alien and Sedition Acts . He seems to go out of his way to accuse conservatives of celebrating a brand of "judicial restraint" that is inconsistent with judicial enforcement of the Takings Clause ; he accuses conservatives of preaching " dogmatic majoritarianism ." 

Quite obviously, I have a few qualms with Will's arguments.  That said, I won't go so far as to say that his generally-libertarian views aren't "conservative."  They certainly don't constitute the current maintstrean modern American conservative jurisprudence; that mantle belongs, as we all know, to a Scalia/Thomas-style Originalism.  Nevertheless, Will's modified libertarianism is a conservative jurisprudence, as are popular constitutionalism, "Lochnerianism" (to butcher a term), and perhaps others.

TODAY IN SLATE

Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

The World

Iran and the U.S. Are Allies

They just aren’t ready to admit it yet.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

How Steven Moffat Made the Best Doctor Who Episode in Years

  News & Politics
The World
Sept. 16 2014 11:56 AM Iran and the U.S. Are Allies Against ISIS but Aren’t Ready to Admit It Yet
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 16 2014 1:23 PM Germany Has Asked Google to Reveal Its Search Algorithm, but That's Not Going to Happen
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 1:27 PM The Veronica Mars Spinoff Is Just Amusing Enough to Keep Me Watching
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 1:48 PM Why We Need a Federal Robotics Commission
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 1:39 PM The Case of the Missing Cerebellum How did a Chinese woman live 24 years missing part of her brain?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.