Will To Power

Slate's blog on legal issues.
March 20 2008 11:22 PM

Will To Power

George Will touched a nerve among conservatives today.  In his new column , he called for judicial intervention to thwart local regulations limiting dancing at a restaurant, in the name of the Fourteenth Amendment.  This embrace of judicial activism certainly didn't please my friends Matt Franck , Ed Whelan , or Steve "Feddie" Dillard .

Steve and Ed seemed a bit surprised by Will's position; I must say, though, that I find it fairly consistent with Will's prior writings.  Will's view of the role of the courts is no different from his view of the role of government generally his primary concern is that government  should minimize interference with personal liberty (particularly on matters of speech).  At the same time, he he opposed judicial disruptions of well-established societal institutions.  (Thus, when the Supreme Court ruled in the VMI case, he famously decried "our robed masters." )  Can these two priorities come into conflict?  Of course.  I've not seen Will wrestle with that point.

Advertisement

Even though (or perhaps because) his own instincts are less-than-systematic, Will loves to pick fights with conservatives on questions of the role of the judiciary.  He is not a fan of "originalism"; he associates it with the Dred Scott decision and the Alien and Sedition Acts . He seems to go out of his way to accuse conservatives of celebrating a brand of "judicial restraint" that is inconsistent with judicial enforcement of the Takings Clause ; he accuses conservatives of preaching " dogmatic majoritarianism ." 

Quite obviously, I have a few qualms with Will's arguments.  That said, I won't go so far as to say that his generally-libertarian views aren't "conservative."  They certainly don't constitute the current maintstrean modern American conservative jurisprudence; that mantle belongs, as we all know, to a Scalia/Thomas-style Originalism.  Nevertheless, Will's modified libertarianism is a conservative jurisprudence, as are popular constitutionalism, "Lochnerianism" (to butcher a term), and perhaps others.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

The Irritating Confidante

John Dickerson on Ben Bradlee’s fascinating relationship with John F. Kennedy.

My Father Invented Social Networking at a Girls’ Reform School in the 1930s

Renée Zellweger’s New Face Is Too Real

Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

Can it be again?

The All The President’s Men Scene That Captured Ben Bradlee

Medical Examiner

Is It Better to Be a Hero Like Batman?

Or an altruist like Bruce Wayne?

Technology

Driving in Circles

The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.

The World’s Human Rights Violators Are Signatories on the World’s Human Rights Treaties

How Punctual Are Germans?

  News & Politics
Politics
Oct. 22 2014 12:44 AM We Need More Ben Bradlees His relationship with John F. Kennedy shows what’s missing from today’s Washington journalism.
  Business
Moneybox
Oct. 21 2014 5:57 PM Soda and Fries Have Lost Their Charm for Both Consumers and Investors
  Life
The Vault
Oct. 21 2014 2:23 PM A Data-Packed Map of American Immigration in 1903
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 21 2014 3:03 PM Renée Zellweger’s New Face Is Too Real
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 21 2014 1:02 PM Where Are Slate Plus Members From? This Weird Cartogram Explains. A weird-looking cartogram of Slate Plus memberships by state.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Oct. 21 2014 9:42 PM The All The President’s Men Scene That Perfectly Captured Ben Bradlee’s Genius
  Technology
Technology
Oct. 21 2014 11:44 PM Driving in Circles The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.
  Health & Science
Climate Desk
Oct. 21 2014 11:53 AM Taking Research for Granted Texas Republican Lamar Smith continues his crusade against independence in science.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.