Managers Tell Women in Tech They Are “Abrasive” and Need to “Step Back” to “Let Others Shine”

What Women Really Think
Aug. 28 2014 2:20 PM

Managers Tell Women in Tech They Are “Abrasive” and Need to “Step Back” to “Let Others Shine”

performance_review
"You're doing great. Just be a little less of everything."

Photo by Pressmaster/Shutterstock

Kieran Snyder had heard about women in the tech word being judged more harshly than their male colleagues for the same traits and wanted to know "how often this perception of female abrasiveness undermines women’s careers." So she asked a group of men and women in tech to share their performance reviews with her, without telling them what the study was for. "The question I wanted to answer was: Did review tone or content differ based on the employee’s gender," Snyder writes in Fortune. It turns out that not only did gender matter, it appears to have mattered a lot, enough to shock even me, a jaded feminist. 

Snyder collected 141 reviews from men and 107 reviews from women. While the reviews were almost all positive—which is why people were willing to share them, Snyder guesses—women were much more likely to receive criticism. "When breaking the reviews down by gender of the person evaluated, 58.9% of the reviews received by men contained critical feedback," Snyder writes. "87.9% of the reviews received by women did."

Advertisement

But when Snyder classified the kinds of criticism offered, that's when things truly got stark. Most of the criticism men got was "heavily geared towards suggestions for additional skills to develop." So, constructive. Women got that too, but they also were told, frequently, to quiet down and step back. "You can come across as abrasive sometimes," reads one review. "Sometimes you need to step back to let others shine," suggests another. This type of criticism was almost exclusively aimed at women:

This kind of negative personality criticism—watch your tone! step back! stop being so judgmental!—shows up twice in the 83 critical reviews received by men. It shows up in 71 of the 94 critical reviews received by women.

These findings track with previous research that shows that people tend to be more generous towards men than women in all sorts of ways in the workplace. Women who talk as much as their male colleagues are seen as too gabby. Men can ask for raises without a social penalty, but women who do so are seen as unpleasant. And it's not just about assertiveness or other traits observed in the workplace. When a researcher gave two groups of subjects resumes to evaluate that were identical, except one was attributed to "John" and one to "Jennifer," "John" was offered an average $4,000 more a year for the same job as "Jennifer."

A few more examples: Men who ask for flex time for family reasons are more likely to get it than women, perhaps (definitely) because managers are more primed to worry that women are going to be a burden, always asking for more more more. Men (white men, anyway) are even given more credit when they show commitment to diversity than women and people of color. There's a huge halo effect that follows men around the office, just for being men. 

So what can be done? While some biases can be combatted with blind hiring practices and aggressive recruitment of women, performance reviews inherently depend on the manager knowing the person being reviewed personally. Managers need to be mindful of the fact that we've all been soaking in a culture that teaches us to be much more judgmental of women than men and that they almost surely have absorbed that bias unconsciously. 

Amanda Marcotte is a Brooklyn-based writer and DoubleX contributor. She also writes regularly for the Daily Beast, AlterNet, and USA Today. Follow her on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

Yes, Black Families Tend to Spank More. That Doesn’t Mean It’s Good for Black Kids.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

Politics

The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 6:23 PM Bryan Cranston Reenacts Baseball’s Best Moments to Promote the Upcoming Postseason
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.