The NYT Congratulates Rich People For Having Better Marriages Than Poor People

What Women Really Think
Feb. 17 2014 3:43 PM

The NYT Congratulates Rich People For Having Better Marriages Than Poor People

We have a tablet! We're rich! We're happy! (ANDREAS SOLARO/AFP/Getty Images)

Photo by ANDREAS SOLARO/AFP/Getty Images

Last week, the Sunday New York Times had us smug marrieds worried we weren’t having enough sex. This week, the paper made us wonder if we were in the wrong kind of marriage altogether. In a Sunday Review article, “The All or Nothing Marriage,” psychology professor Eli Finkel argues that marriage, as a whole, is not better or worse, but that a small minority of marriages are stronger and more satisfying than ever before, while the average marriage is weaker. The article was accompanied by an illustration showing two couples in different rowboats. The happy couple floats under the shade of a tree as she reads to him. The unhappy pair is bailing out with buckets as the boat sinks. Demographically they look about the same, the men in J. Crew style get-ups, the women in Ann Taylor-like work wear.

The article presents itself as falling into the category New York magazine recently dubbed high-brow self help, a genre educated people read in order to improve their lot in life. But the story leaves the entirely wrong impression about the binary in American marriage. Reading it, a married person would be tempted to do an emotional inventory—do we fight a lot? Are we happier than our friends? But what he really should do is check the bank account and the wall of framed diplomas. The happiest couples are generally the ones with the most education and money.


Finkel writes that Americans today have higher expectations of marriage than ever before, but they can achieve the high quality marriage only “if they are able to invest a great deal of time and energy in their partnerships.” If not, the marriage is weak or doesn’t last. This is what he means by “all or nothing.” In an era of what he calls the “self expressive marriage,” couples expect a great amount of personal growth and self-discovery in a marriage. If it doesn’t happen, they consider the marriage a failure. So couples who spent time every week talking or sharing an activity are 3.5 times more likely to be happy in their marriage, according to a study Finkel quotes.

But is talking and sharing activities really the dividing line between successful and failed marriages? Marriage, after all, is an institution that is “flourishing among the rich but floundering among the poor,” argues Richard Reeves in the Atlantic. We recently passed the milestone where rates of marriage are higher for the college educated than for people who did not graduate from college. That’s the real marriage gap, and it has nothing to do with date nights. Reeves, in fact, makes a convincing case that what makes marriages stick these days is “high intensity parenting.” HIP, he writes, gives the marriage a joint purpose and cuts against the selfishness of the age of self expression. But it also takes time, and by all accounts couples of all class levels are spending less time together than ever before. It’s just that elite couples are diverting some of that together time toward their children, while the rest are just surviving.

The all-or-nothing nature of marriage does not belong in the discussion with quality time or multitasking or any of the things we readers of the New York Times often worry about. It’s part of the story about growing and radical inequality in America. New studies confirm that more than ever people are pairing off on class and education lines, that your marriage, as Matt Yglesias recently wrote, is probably making America more unequal, especially if you have the time and resources to read Sunday Review articles.

Finkel makes a nod to the socioeconomic dimension at the very end of the essay but then counsels that “first and foremost couples can choose to invest more time and energy in their marriage.” This is why couples reading the paper together on a Sunday morning probably come away feeling flattered, because it implies that their marriage is good because they are so good at marriage. But if you’re poor, even marathon pillow talk sessions probably won’t put you on the right side of the divide.

Hanna Rosin is the founder of DoubleX and a writer for the Atlantic. She is also the author of The End of Men. Follow her on Twitter.


Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

There Are New Abuse Allegations Against Adrian Peterson

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

John Oliver Pleads for Scotland to Stay With the U.K.

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter


Don’t Expect Adrian Peterson to Go to Prison

In much of America, beating your kids is perfectly legal. 

The Juice

Ford’s Big Gamble

It’s completely transforming America’s best-selling vehicle.

I Tried to Write an Honest Profile of One of Bollywood’s Biggest Stars. It Didn’t Go Well.

Here’s Why College Women Don’t Take Rape Allegations to the Police

The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 1:51 PM Here’s Why College Women Don’t Take Rape Allegations to the Police
  News & Politics
Sept. 15 2014 8:56 PM The Benghazi Whistleblower Who Might Have Revealed a Massive Scandal on his Poetry Blog
Sept. 15 2014 7:27 PM Could IUDs Be the Next Great Weapon in the Battle Against Poverty?
Sept. 15 2014 4:38 PM What Is Straight Ice Cream?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Brow Beat
Sept. 15 2014 8:58 PM Lorde Does an Excellent Cover of Kanye West’s “Flashing Lights”
Future Tense
Sept. 15 2014 4:49 PM Cheetah Robot Is Now Wireless and Gallivanting on MIT’s Campus
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 15 2014 11:00 AM The Comet and the Cosmic Beehive
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.