Wendy Davis, Hero to the Pro-Choice Movement, Comes Out in Support of a 20-Week Abortion Ban

The XX Factor
What Women Really Think
Feb. 12 2014 3:13 PM

Wendy Davis, Hero to the Pro-Choice Movement, Comes Out in Support of a 20-Week Abortion Ban

How will Team Wendy feel about her remarks to the Dallas Morning News?

Photo by Stewart F. House/Getty Images

Texas state Sen. Wendy Davis made her name and kick-started her campaign for governor by filibustering an anti-abortion omnibus bill, standing and talking for 11 hours straight in support of abortion rights. So it comes as a surprise—and frankly, a betrayal—to learn that Davis told the Dallas Morning News on Tuesday that she could support a ban on abortions after 20 weeks, if it gave "enough deference between a woman and her doctor" to make the decision to abort after that point for medical reasons. The current 20-week ban in Texas, which is part of the bill that Davis opposed but finally passed toward the end of the summer, has very narrow restrictions, only allowing post-20-week abortions in the case of fetal abnormality with "severe, irreversible brain impairment" and threats to a woman's life. The exception Davis seems to be advocating for would be broader, allowing women to abort for a broader range of medical problems, including a larger range of fetal abnormalities, than the current law allows.

Davis' statement comes as a shock, but perhaps that's because we weren't paying close enough attention. Though Davis' opponents prefer to characterize her filibuster as nothing more than a defense of later-term abortions, in truth the bill she stood against was mostly written to shut down access to safe first-trimester abortions. And her remarks this week are largely consistent with what she said during the filibuster, when she argued that the medical exceptions in the bill for later-term abortions were too narrow, replacing a doctor's judgment with that of nonexperts like judges.


Any abortion ban based on the lie of "fetal pain"—a lie that Davis debunked in her filibuster—is there for no other purpose but to make women's lives harder, so it's frustrating to see Davis come out with those statements. She is clearly banking on the fact that the 20-week ban is, realistically speaking, a minor issue when it comes to the broader attacks on abortion rights. Though we talk about these later-term abortions as if they are an epidemic, abortions after 20 weeks are a tiny fraction of abortions overall, just a little more than 1 percent of all abortions. A large chunk of these would still be legal under the kind of ban Davis says she could support, with broad rights to terminate in cases where a doctor advises it for medical reasons, since many fetal abnormalities aren't discovered or pregnancy complications don't arise until after 20 weeks. 

Still, most of the rest of the post-20-week abortions occur because it's so hard to get an early term abortion in the first place, especially if you're poor or geographically isolated, something that the new Texas law will make significantly harder. Davis' stance means turning her back on women who get post-20-week abortions because they couldn't get the money and time together to do it earlier—the women she was fighting for when she stood all those hours to keep clinics open so that women wouldn't have to travel so far and wait so long in the first place. 

So why is Davis, a hero to the pro-choice movement, supporting any sort of 20-week ban? While 54 percent of Americans oppose attempts to shut down abortion clinics, 56 percent also believe that it's best to ban abortions after 20 weeks, likely because the anti-abortion movement has been so good at spreading the lie that fetuses feel pain after 20 weeks. By opposing all the parts of the Texas law aimed at shutting down clinics while offering tentative support to a hypothetical ban on abortions after 20 weeks, Davis aligns herself with the majority view on the subject of abortion. You may have bought her sneakers, but when it comes down to it, Wendy Davis is a politician. 

Amanda Marcotte is a Brooklyn-based writer and DoubleX contributor. She also writes regularly for the Daily Beast, AlterNet, and USA Today. Follow her on Twitter.



Forget Oculus Rift

This $25 cardboard box turns your phone into an incredibly fun virtual reality experience.

Republicans Want the Government to Listen to the American Public on Ebola. That’s a Horrible Idea.

The 2014 Kansas City Royals Show the Value of Building a Mediocre Baseball Team

The GOP Won’t Win Any Black Votes With Its New “Willie Horton” Ad

Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band

Can it be again?


Smash and Grab

Will competitive Senate contests in Kansas and South Dakota lead to more late-breaking races in future elections?

I Am 25. I Don’t Work at Facebook. My Doctors Want Me to Freeze My Eggs.

These Companies in Japan Are More Than 1,000 Years Old

  News & Politics
The World
Oct. 21 2014 11:40 AM The U.S. Has Spent $7 Billion Fighting the War on Drugs in Afghanistan. It Hasn’t Worked. 
Oct. 21 2014 1:12 PM The Global Millionaires Club Is Booming and Losing Its Exclusivity
Atlas Obscura
Oct. 21 2014 12:40 PM Asamkirche: The Rococo Church Where Death Hides in Plain Sight
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 21 2014 1:12 PM George Tiller's Murderer Threatens Another Abortion Doctor, Claims Right of Free Speech
  Slate Plus
Behind the Scenes
Oct. 21 2014 1:02 PM Where Are Slate Plus Members From? This Weird Cartogram Explains. A weird-looking cartogram of Slate Plus memberships by state.
Oct. 21 2014 12:05 PM Same-Sex Couples at Home With Themselves in 1980s America
Oct. 21 2014 10:43 AM Social Networking Didn’t Start at Harvard It really began at a girls’ reform school.
  Health & Science
Climate Desk
Oct. 21 2014 11:53 AM Taking Research for Granted Texas Republican Lamar Smith continues his crusade against independence in science.
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.