Twitter Can't Decide Whether to Let You "Block" Or "Mute" Harassers. Why Not Offer Both?

What Women Really Think
Dec. 13 2013 1:10 PM

Twitter Needs More Security Options

187232512
Twitter needs to give users multiple ways to deal with a variety of trolls and stalkers.

Photo by Andrew Burton/Getty Images

Thursday, Twitter announced it was reducing the power of the block button ever so slightly, making it more like a "mute" than a block. Within hours, the company had restored the block function back to its original state, after users, including many women, objected to the change. It was yet another demonstration of why it's critical to get more women into decision-making roles in the social media industry: Women are sadly more likely to have firsthand experience with dealing with a social media stalker and are more likely to understand how dogged these guys can be.

Under the current system, if you block someone, they can see that they're blocked because they can't follow you or retweet your tweets. The problem that Twitter was, by their own measure, trying to fix is that by blocking someone, you are inadvertently acknowledging that user. He knows he got your attention long enough to be blocked, and a troll can eat out on that realization for a week. What the new system would have done was made it so that you couldn't see him but he could see you, so he would spend his days and nights sending you harassing tweets, having no idea that you weren't hearing any of it. It's quite a pleasing image—especially if you're a public figure, and 99.9 percent of the harassment you get online is from strangers anyway—so it's easy to see why Twitter thought it would fix the problem. 

Advertisement

But while muting trolls is smarter than blocking them for exactly this reason, for people who are dealing with actual stalkers online, this change presents its own problems. If the blocked person can still see, retweet, and favorite the object of his obsession, then, even if he can't get to her as easily, he has a constant stream of material to feed his obsession. Plus, the temporary change underestimated the amount of creativity that a stalker puts into trying to find ways to get to his target. If your stalker ex-boyfriend retweets everything you write to let you know he's watching you, simply not seeing it is not particularly soothing. Anyway, someone else in your common social circles will likely see his behavior and report it back to you. 

It's true that, under the current system, Twitter's security leaves much to be desired, and there's not an easy fix for a lot of it. If you block someone, all he has to do to see your account is log out and look at your public tweets. (Which is why, if you're not a public figure and you have a stalker, setting your tweets to "private" may be the best solution.) If someone wants to continue to harass you, he can just start up another account. 

There's no one perfect solution to all this, which is why the smart thing for Twitter to do is give the user flexibility. Why not have both a "block" and a "mute" button? That way, you can weigh the pros and cons and decide if the best solution for your current harasser is to let him wail at you incessantly without any knowledge that you can't seehim, or if cutting him off from the sweet honey of knowing what you're tweeting is the better plan. We customize our follow lists, our user profile, and even the backdrop of our Twitter page. Why not let us customize our security options?

Amanda Marcotte is a Brooklyn-based writer and DoubleX contributor. She also writes regularly for the Daily Beast, AlterNet, and USA Today. Follow her on Twitter.

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.

Jurisprudence

Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 17 2014 8:15 AM Ted Cruz Will Not Join a Protest of "The Death of Klinghoffer" After All
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 9:03 AM My Father Was James Brown. I Watched Him Beat My Mother. And Then I Found Myself With Someone Like Dad.
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 8:27 AM Only Science Fiction Can Save Us! What sci-fi gets wrong about income inequality.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 17 2014 7:30 AM Ring Around the Rainbow
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.