You Might Not Be Beautiful the Way You Are

What Women Really Think
Oct. 2 2013 2:14 PM

You Might Not Be Beautiful the Way You Are


Courtesy NYC Girls Project

New York City has unveiled a new public health drive to improve girls’ self-esteem and body image. The $330,000 campaign, called the NYC Girls Project, kicked off Monday with bus and subway ads starring 21 amateur models of different races and sizes (some are the daughters of city workers) giggling, beaming, playing the violin, palming a basketball, or flexing their arms. “I’m a leader, adventurous, outgoing, sporty, unique, smart and strong,” say the signs. Or: “I’m funny, playful, daring, strong, curious, smart, brave, healthy, friendly and caring.” Or: “I’m clever, adventurous, outgoing, unique, smart and strong.”

The initiative, tagged with the slogan, “I’m Beautiful the Way I Am,” comes from Mayor Michael Bloomberg by way of his deputy press secretary Samantha Levine, who told the New York Times that she’d been inspired to tackle pop representations of female beauty after hearing about little girls donning shapewear and getting plastic surgery. (She also called out a Dear Sugar advice column in which Cheryl Strayed bemoaned women’s obsession with their bejeaned butts as a feminist failure.) And campaign organizers have cited painful statistics: that “more than 80 percent of 10-year-old girls are afraid of being fat” and that “girls’ self-esteem drops at age 12 and does not improve until 20.” Hopefully bombarding kids with uplifting signs in the subway will help counteract the body image pressures that lead to these depressing factoids.

In case they don’t, the movement, which targets girls 7 through 12, will also involve physical fitness classes, an after-school pilot program addressing self-esteem issues for girls, and the Twitter campaign #ImAGirl. Plus, according to the New York Times “a 30 second video will be shown in taxis, on YouTube and on the campaign’s web site.”


This initiative gets so many things right. But to pick a nit, what’s with the slogan? As Kat Stoeffel at the Cut notes, “There’s something slightly contradictory about the NYC Girls Project message—‘Don’t worry about how you look. You look beautiful!’ ” Isn’t the point of the program to encourage girls to disassociate their sense of worth from their physical appearance? Why couldn’t the slogan simply be, “I’m Awesome the Way I Am?”

We have poured tons of time and energy into reclaiming the word beautiful for women everywhere. “You’re beautiful,” we assure one another, differentiating as needed between some starlet’s “conventional beauty” and our friend’s “unique, nontraditional” allure. We talk confusingly about inner loveliness when what we really mean is strength, ebullience, or compassion. Let’s cut our losses with trying to redefine beauty and decathect. Society will always slap us with arbitrary appearance-based standards, and some people will always fail to meet them, whatever they are. And so what? We’re only making the problem worse by pretending this isn’t so.

For some girls, the slogan “I’m Beautiful the Way I Am” is a lie. And surely, all else being equal, most of us would rather be beautiful than not. But all else being equal, I would also rather have 20/20 vision or a black belt in karate. Society’s solution for people like me is not to say, “You are perfectly-sighted/skilled in martial arts just the way you are.” Why? Because needing glasses or lacking karate chops are not horrible, soul-destroying hardships that butcher our chances for happiness in life. That physical appearance does make such a difference in others’ perceptions of us (with all kinds of professional, legal, and interpersonal repercussions) only underscores why it’s important to rein in subjective beauty standards as arbiters of worth.

In the Dear Sugar column that Levine cited to the Times, Strayed drops wisdom on a questioner who dreads exposing her “imperfect” naked body to a potential partner. “The answer to your conundrum isn’t finding a way to make your future lover believe you look like Angelina Jolie,” Strayed writes. “It’s coming to terms with the fact that you don’t and never will.”

Katy Waldman Katy Waldman

Katy Waldman is a Slate staff writer. 



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge


The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.