Study Investigates Why People Stalk Their Partners on Facebook

What Women Really Think
Aug. 26 2013 3:17 PM

Study Investigates Why People Stalk Their Partners on Facebook

165158667
What did he just post?

Photo by Nicolas Asfouri/AFP/Getty Images

New York City’s stop-and-frisk program and the NSA’s phone tapping raise constitutional questions, but at least the stated motivations are clear: to stop bad guys. But what makes someone likely to monitor a romantic partner on Facebook?

A new study in the journal Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking investigates the link between a person's attachment style—how he or she connects to others, based on bonds with primary caregivers in early childhood—and interpersonal electronic surveillance (IES). Jessie Fox of Ohio State University and Katie Warber of Wittenberg University wanted to find out whether people with “preoccupied” or “fearful” attachment styles—in other words, people whose relationships are marked by high anxiety—were more likely to monitor their boyfriends or girlfriends on social networks. They also wondered whether “relationship uncertainty”—“perceptions of ambiguity” within a romantic bond—predicted heightened IES.

Advertisement

The researchers recruited 328 students—women and men, 18–48, and mostly straight and white (sigh)—from a “large Midwestern university” and gave them three surveys. The first measured partner monitoring on Facebook. (For instance, respondents were asked to rate their agreement with statements like, “I visit my partner’s social networking page often.”) The second scored relationship security. (Respondents chose numbers on a 1–6 scale to reflect “how certain [they] felt in [their] relationship.) The third identified students’ real-life attachment styles, distinguishing between the “secure,” “preoccupied,” “dismissive,” and “fearful.” Then, Fox and Warber ran a battery of statistical analyses searching for connections between various answers on the three questionnaires.

You will not be surprised to learn that students with “preoccupied” or “fearful” attachment styles reported checking up more often on their romantic partners. (Seriously, Fox and Warber? You needed to conduct an experiment to figure out that people who experience more free-floating anxiety about their relationships will trawl more zealously through their partners’ feeds? Have you never watched Swimfan?) You may, however, be surprised to hear that relationship uncertainty had no bearing on IES. Whether or not students felt their romances were on shaky ground did not change their stalking habits. In other words, your obsessive monitoring of your boyfriend's Twitter feed says more about you than the relationship. Feel better?

Katy Waldman is a Slate staff writer. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS

But the next president might. 

IOS 8 Comes Out Today. Do Not Put It on Your iPhone 4S.

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

How Much Should You Loathe NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell?

Here are the facts.

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Science

The Human Need to Find Connections in Everything

It’s the source of creativity and delusions. It can harm us more than it helps us.

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

The Ungodly Horror of Having a Bug Crawl Into Your Ear and Scratch Away at Your Eardrum

We Could Fix Climate Change for Free. What Exactly Is Holding Us Back?

  News & Politics
Politics
Sept. 17 2014 5:21 PM Don’t Worry, Obama Isn’t Sending U.S. Troops to Fight ISIS But the next president might. 
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 17 2014 1:36 PM Nate Silver Versus Princeton Professor: Who Has the Right Models?
  Life
Gentleman Scholar
Sept. 17 2014 5:10 PM Should Men Still Open Doors for Women? Or is it ungentlemanly to do so at all?  
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 17 2014 4:36 PM Is Nonfiction the Patriarch of Literary Genres?
  Slate Plus
Slate Fare
Sept. 17 2014 9:37 AM Is Slate Too Liberal?  A members-only open thread.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 17 2014 5:56 PM Watch Louis C.K., Dave Chappelle, Bill Hicks, Mitch Hedberg, and More on New YouTube Channel
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 17 2014 5:26 PM If Fixing Global Warming Is Free, What’s the Holdup?
  Health & Science
Jurisprudence
Sept. 17 2014 4:49 PM Schooling the Supreme Court on Rap Music Is it art or a true threat of violence?
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 17 2014 3:51 PM NFL Jerk Watch: Roger Goodell How much should you loathe the pro football commissioner?