Despite various legal setbacks, the anti-choice movement's relentless passing of anti-abortion legislation has taken some casualties. The Huffington Post surveyed state health departments nationwide and found that, since 2010, 54 abortion clinics in 27 states have closed, many due to medically unnecessary, politically motivated regulations. This kind of rapid loss will have a dramatic impact on how available safe, legal abortion is for huge numbers of American women.
Researchers from the Guttmacher Institute surveyed abortion patients in 2008 and found that the median distance to travel for an abortion was already 15 miles, with a third traveling more than 25 miles to get an abortion. Rural women were in a particularly bad situation, with 31 percent of them having to travel 100 miles or more to get an abortion. That was all before this recent round of clinic closures, so there's every reason to believe these kinds of statistics are getting worse. The situation is particularly concerning for Texas and Arizona. Those two states have lost 21 clinics between them, putting low-income and rural women who need abortions in a very tight spot. And this is all before Texas's new law aimed at closing clinics goes into effect. If it doesn't get blocked by the courts, the state is expected to lose even more, leaving only five left in a very large state.
Unlike what anti-choice advocates would have you believe, pro-choicers do not have a secret plan to open an abortion clinic on every corner. But we'd like women to have a bevy of options should the need arise. And the need arises a lot. Twenty-two percent of pregnancies (excluding miscarriage) end in abortion. Every year, about 1 in 50 women will get an abortion, and about 1 and 3 women will get one in her lifetime. And yet, the Daily Beast counted only 724 clinics open at the beginning of 2013. With a medical procedure as safe and common and medically uncomplicated as abortion is, it would make more sense to have a provider in every town instead of the current situation, where a shockingly low number of providers have to put themselves in centralized locations and patients travel out of their way to get to them.
This problem of accessibility is certainly reflective of the current political climate, where a lot of people have this sense that abortion should be legal but also a hassle, presumably so women don't feel they got off too easy. It's a nice, comfortable opinion for someone who isn't currently dealing with an unwanted pregnancy. In reality, however, setting up a bunch of needless obstacles is just arbitrary cruelty. There's no moral lesson in making abortion harder to get. Taking away clinics is just creating hardship for the sake of hardship, a bit of pointless cruelty dished out mainly by politicians who will never have to live with the consequences of it. Unless their daughter gets pregnant, and then they'll probably just make the drive.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Ebola Story
How our minds build narratives out of disaster.
The Budget Disaster That Completely Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola
PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer
The Shooting Tragedies That Forged Canada’s Gun Politics
A Highly Unscientific Ranking of Crazy-Old German Beers
Welcome to 13th Grade!
Some high schools are offering a fifth year. That’s a great idea.
The Actual World
“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.