Not Just Bad TV: Why the New Attachment Parenting Reality Show Is Unethical   

The XX Factor
What Women Really Think
July 17 2012 10:08 AM

Why the Attachment Parenting Show Is Unethical   

Time cover breastfeeding
The infamous cover

Time Magazine, May 11, 2012.

When Jamie Lynne Grumet pulled down her tank top and stood her son, at the time almost 4 years old, on a chair so he could pose nursing for a Time cover story on attachment parenting in May, my main reaction was sympathy for her son. It's embarrassing enough for us to come face-to-face with our younger selves on our parents' refrigerators. I couldn't imagine having my baby bath pictures, much less a snapshot of me doing something a lot of people find controversial, available in my Google search results before I hit elementary school, for any well-meaning school teacher, nosy classmate, first date, or potential employer to see for years to come.

Turns out Grumet's son got off easy. Jeff Collins, president of the production company responsible for Dance Moms, among other reality shows, is working on a reality program about extended breast-feeding and other "extreme parenting" techniques. "We've discovered people are raising kids in all kinds of untraditional ways these days," Collins told Yahoo, "and some people find their methods to be extreme."


I'm sure Collins is right to bet that this topic will draw viewers, even among those who might consider themselves too highbrow for Toddlers and Tiaras, or its spinoff Here Comes Honey Boo Boo, which features a particularly deluded mother and daughter. There seems to be an endless market for columns, books, trashy reality programming, and magazine covers that provide opportunities for people to judge each other's parenting decisions, be it Tiger Mothering, toddler breast-feeding, or doping your daughter with the stimulant "go-go juice" to psych her up for beauty pagents. And that demand is, sadly, matched by an endless supply of parents willing to expose themselves and their children in the hopes that their genius will be recognized, or in the savvier calculation that toughing out ridicule may be worth the financial payout. That shows like these appear on TLC, once the Learning Channel, gives some of them them the cover of "documentary filmmaking," but the truth is that they are human disaster porn, whether chronicling traumatic births or pageant meltdowns.

Also: Just because a show about unusual parenting tactics might be successful doesn't mean it's a good idea. The parents involved in Collins' latest effort may be able to ride it to talk show appearances and parenting book deals. But their kids will be nationally televised lab rats in these parenting experiments, judged for how they turn out as a result of treatment that diverges from the norm (and probably more so for the cameras), before they even have a shot at crafting their own identities and breaking free from their parents' influence. The kids will be paraded out in front of a huge audience, indelible images of them created week to week, long before they can give any meaningful consent. And, if the show succeeds, many, many people will profit.

NPR's Linda Holmes, in a post written after the suicide of a Real Housewife of Beverly Hills husband, laid out a proposed code of ethics for reality television, including the suggestion that "shows agree to use no nonincidental footage of any child under age 10, and to employ an on-set counselor specializing in adolescents to provide care and advice on the well-being of any participant who is a minor." It would be nice if that sensible suggestion resonated with enough networks to make a difference. But adopting it would kill an entire genre of reality programming, where parents try to get famous on their children's coattails. The financial incentives are too great for networks to listen to Holmes. And the truth is that Dance Moms and Toddlers and Tiaras have already set the bar so low that Extreme Parenting, as the series is tentatively titled, will probably come across as tame to whatever network eventually chooses to pick it up—and as just one more show for viewers to roll their eyes at, and watch.

Alyssa Rosenberg writes about culture and television for Slate’s “XX Factor” blog. She also contributes to ThinkProgress and



The Ebola Story

How our minds build narratives out of disaster.

The Budget Disaster That Completely Sabotaged the WHO’s Response to Ebola

PowerPoint Is the Worst, and Now It’s the Latest Way to Hack Into Your Computer

The Shooting Tragedies That Forged Canada’s Gun Politics

A Highly Unscientific Ranking of Crazy-Old German Beers


Welcome to 13th Grade!

Some high schools are offering a fifth year. That’s a great idea.


The Actual World

“Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.

Want Kids to Delay Sex? Let Planned Parenthood Teach Them Sex Ed.

Would You Trust Walmart to Provide Your Health Care? (You Should.)

  News & Politics
Oct. 22 2014 9:42 PM Landslide Landrieu Can the Louisiana Democrat use the powers of incumbency to save herself one more time?
Continuously Operating
Oct. 22 2014 2:38 PM Crack Open an Old One A highly unscientific evaluation of Germany’s oldest breweries.
Dear Prudence
Oct. 23 2014 6:00 AM Monster Kids from poorer neighborhoods keep coming to trick-or-treat in mine. Do I have to give them candy?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Oct. 22 2014 4:27 PM Three Ways Your Text Messages Change After You Get Married
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Oct. 22 2014 5:27 PM The Slate Walking Dead Podcast A spoiler-filled discussion of Episodes 1 and 2.
Oct. 22 2014 11:54 PM The Actual World “Mount Thoreau” and the naming of things in the wilderness.
Future Tense
Oct. 22 2014 5:33 PM One More Reason Not to Use PowerPoint: It’s The Gateway for a Serious Windows Vulnerability
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Oct. 23 2014 7:30 AM Our Solar System and Galaxy … Seen by an Astronaut
Sports Nut
Oct. 20 2014 5:09 PM Keepaway, on Three. Ready—Break! On his record-breaking touchdown pass, Peyton Manning couldn’t even leave the celebration to chance.