In a Sexless Marriage, the Marriage Is the Problem, Not the Breast-Feeding

What Women Really Think
July 16 2012 2:51 PM

In a Sexless Marriage, the Marriage Is the Problem, Not the Breast-Feeding

Breast-feeding.
Is this a turn-off, James Braly?

Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images

For those who suspect that the trendiness of attachment parenting may be the result of women looking for a guilt-free way to terminate marital relations (pushing husbands out of the family bed, so to speak), James Braly's piece about his wife's aggressive breast-feeding in the New York Times this weekend provides new ammunition.

Amanda Marcotte Amanda Marcotte

Amanda Marcotte is a Brooklyn-based writer and DoubleX contributor. She also writes regularly for the Daily Beast, AlterNet, and USA Today. Follow her on Twitter.

Braly drew a lot of criticism and even outright abuse for suggesting that a wife, running the romance out of a marriage for five-plus years in order to attend to extended breast-feeding, might make daddy resentful. And for suggesting that this could hurt children in the long run even if they enjoy being able to grab mommy's boob whenever they want it now. Doug Barry at Jezebel, for instance, called the piece a "flurry of self-involvement, misogyny, and presumption."

Advertisement

Braly frames his argument in the most sexist terms possible, claiming that his wife's body isn't her own but is an object that he used to own and now his son has stolen from him.

I know, most women think their breasts are theirs. ... So to everyone chanting “My Body! My Choice!” I say, “Your Body! Our Nookie!” We are in this together, women and children, men—and breasts.

He describes a man as "king of the castle." Actually bothering to get his wife's opinion on the matter of sex doesn't seem to occur to him. We have no indication if the end of sex is simply a result of his disgust with her breast-feeding or if she's just as turned off by him as he is by her.

Braly never stops to take any responsibility for creating a marriage so child-oriented that sex has vanished from it. He simply wants to have his baby-making cake and eat his lusty evenings too. He frames sexual desire as something only men have, and sees women's bodies as machines that serve the needs of men and/or children. The possibility that women could also be frustrated and unhappy when cut off from sex therefore doesn't occur to him. Braly implies that the problem is more that his wife allows him to see the work that she puts into raising his children than it is about the actual work. He's so personally repulsive, it's tempting to leave it at that. 

It's a shame, because the whole thing reinforces a prevalent sex-negative narrative in our culture that holds that anyone who is unceremoniously cut off from sex in their relationship, yet still expected to be monogamous, is a shallow monster if they take issue with it. Braly paints men in this position in Tim Allen-level broad brush terms, describing horniness as "biology for most men," imagining that the only thing women could want as much is to breast-feed.

I'm a huge feminist, so of course I believe that no one should be having sex they don't want to have, even to indulge a long-term partner. The flip side of that is that no one therefore should be expected to be in a relationship that's making them unhappy for fear of being labeled shallow or sex-obsessed. Battles over sex vs. breast-feeding are all the more frustrating for being unnecessary. Find the right partner, and you can have both.

TODAY IN SLATE

Foreigners

More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

Three Talented Actresses in Three Terrible New Shows

Why Do Some People See the Virgin Mary in Grilled Cheese?

The science that explains the human need to find meaning in coincidences.

Jurisprudence

Happy Constitution Day!

Too bad it’s almost certainly unconstitutional.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

What to Do if You Literally Get a Bug in Your Ear

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
  Life
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 16 2014 11:46 PM The Scariest Campfire Story More horrifying than bears, snakes, or hook-handed killers.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.