Is the Obama Campaign’s New Focus on Women Condescending?

The XX Factor
What Women Really Think
March 12 2012 3:01 PM

Is the Obama Campaign’s New Focus on Women Condescending?

84383971

Photo by TIM SLOAN/AFP/Getty Images

Hey girl, if you didn’t know already, Obama really wants your vote.

That was the clear message of a pair of articles that ran over the weekend reporting on the Obama campaign’s efforts to court women this election year, especially in light of the Republican competition’s recent stumbling on contraception and reproductive health. According to the New York Times, Obama’s troops will mail literature to about “one million women in more than a dozen battleground states in three separate versions for mothers, young women and older women” over the next few days, and the month will end with a special “Women’s Week of Action” full of house parties, phone banks, and similar activities.  

Advertisement

It’s clear that the female vote—which accounted for 53 percent of the total electorate in 2008—will be crucial in this year’s race; pandering is to be expected. But I and a number of my colleagues at DoubleX can’t help but hear a sour note in the president’s love song to the ladies. Call us cynical, but something about the campaign’s mawkish “women are the future” rhetoric is just a little cringe-inducing.  

To be clear, I don’t mean to imply that Obama is some kind of secret misogynist; his respect for women is clearly exemplified in the way he treats his wife and daughters, and, of course, his efforts for women’s health and equal pay are undoubtedly noble. But this is actually part of the problem: the condescension vibe that I’m describing is the cognitive dissonance that results when the earnestness of the president’s message grates against the very cold political reality that "women" are also just a faceless bloc that Obama clearly needs to win a second term. The calculation is so well-known by now (with help from the GOP’s self-destructive intrusion in couple’s sex lives) that warm-and-fuzzy empowerment messages start to sound contrived.

And let’s not forget how the idealistic tenor of the 2008 campaign has gone a little flat in the intervening years. Other identity groups, such as the LGBT community, have realized that the community-organizer-speak of “stakeholders” and “giving voice to everyone” easily and necessarily fades under the pressures of political expediency. At some point, the honeymoon must end, and every group morphs from a special partner deserving of courtship to a special interest requiring management. As Obama’s political dance card fills up for a second round, I suspect that we’ll see decidedly less sweeping of feet, even if women and other groups ultimately take his hand.  

J. Bryan Lowder is a Slate assistant editor. He writes and edits for Outward, Slate’s LGBTQ section, and for the culture section.

  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Dec. 19 2014 4:15 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? Staff writer Lily Hay Newman shares what stories intrigued her at the magazine this week.