Posted Thursday, March 8, 2012, at 1:29 PM
Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)***RIGHT IMAGE***NEW YORK - APRIL 12: Actress and event host Julianne Moore speaks at the 'Giant Steps To The Cure' Gala hosted by the Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance at Pier Sixty at Chelsea Piers on April 12, 2007 in New York City. (Photo by Bryan Bedder/Getty Images for Tuberous Sclerosis Alliance
Sarah Palin’s people have given their final word on HBO’s Game Change, the show which premieres this weekend based on the book of the same name. On her Facebook page and SarahPAC, Palin’s people repeated their talking point that the movie is “historical fiction,” with the emphasis on fiction - “a series of scenes where the dialogue, locations and participants are invented or rendered unrecognizable for dramatic effect.” Palin even recorded her own fake trailer which rises to the dramatic crescendo of Palin’s awesomeness, and thus is as boring and un-dramatic as any average campaign commercial.
But could Palin be right? The filmmakers, and actors have all said that the portrayal of Palin is “sympathetic” – and I imagine many reviewers will say the same. But that might mean “sympathetic” by Hollywood standards. From the trailer it looks as if there are two Sarah Palins in the movie. The first is a straight talking, ass kicking Alaska girl, the Braveheart of the campaign trail who says things like, “I am not your puppet” and “I am singlehandedly carrying this campaign and I will do what I want.”
The second seems like the frail lunatic who crumples on the couch and has to be gently managed by all the male handlers. From the book Game Change on which the movie is based this portrayal has plenty of truth in it, but it also happens to be Hollywood’s favorite way to handle the female pols, by overemphasizing their hysterical, domestic dramas – The Iron Lady being the latest example.
New York magazine recently ran an interview with Julianne Moore, who plays Palin in the movie and seems genuinely sympathetic to her.
She had a 4-month-old Down-syndrome child, and she had a 7-year-old, a 14-year-old, a pregnant 17-year-old, and another kid about to go to Iraq,” she ticks off. “You don’t know yet how you feel when you just had a baby,” she says a bit accusingly. When I suggest that, just maybe, Palin used her kids in certain ways politically, Moore jumps quickly to her defense. “I have to say, I don’t believe she did,” she says
But again, this sympathy is slightly condescending no? Palin may be wrong about most everything but she is not wrong that you really can’t trust the Hollywood liberals to make a decent show about politics. Ides of March was merely the latest movie revealing the industry’s embarrassing fantasy about what a perfect American candidate looks like: recycles, has gay friends, doesn’t believe in God, is indifferent to fashion but is nonetheless as handsome as George Clooney.