Process-Oriented Bad Faith

What Women Really Think
Nov. 9 2010 12:21 PM

Process-Oriented Bad Faith

/blogs/xx_factor/2010/11/09/complaints_about_judicial_activism_cover_for_prejudice/jcr:content/body/slate_image
Amanda Marcotte Amanda Marcotte

Amanda Marcotte is a Brooklyn-based writer and DoubleX contributor. She also writes regularly for the Daily Beast, AlterNet, and USA Today. Follow her on Twitter.

It's 2010, 14 years into the Defense of Marriage Act, and now the lawsuits that could result in DOMA being ruled unconstitutional are really starting to get underway .  I'm not a lawyer, but the argument against DOMA seems airtight, and hopefully by the time one of these cases makes it to the Supreme Court, the justices will see it that way, too.  But what I'm most interested in is the quote in the New York Times from the notorious anti-gay bigot Maggie Gallagher.

Advertisement

Maggie Gallagher, the chairwoman of the National Organization for Marriage , a group that opposes same-sex marriage, said court challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act showed that gay rights advocates "continue to push a primarily court-based strategy of, in our view, inventing rights that neither the founders nor the majority of Americans can recognize in our Constitution."

The two process arguments that conservatives rely on so they don't have to come out and say they support legal discrimination are "judicial activism" and "states' rights."  The idea is that we all pretend they have some principled stand on the process, and the side effect of legal discrimination is just an unfortunate circumstance that's out of their control, and not their ultimate goal at all.  But this quote exposes how empty that rhetoric is.  After all, if you believe in states' rights, DOMA is an outrage, since it usurps the right of states to legalize gay marriage.

Basically, Gallagher is arguing that the Founders didn't intend for the Supreme Court to look at the constitutionality of federal legislation like DOMA. If they didn't intend for this to happen, they probably shouldn't have granted them that power .  "Judicial activism" is a complaint that conservatives concocted to claim that the courts don't have a right to rule on state legislation, like legal segregation or bans on interracial marriage. It's a silly argument by itself, but even funnier when someone like Gallagher tries to expand it to suggeest that the Founders wanted the Supreme Court to be unable to overturn federal legislation.

Of course, the irony here is that Gallagher probably would get bunched up if you asked if she supports the kind of rulings that do fall under the "states' rights" overreach argument.  Does she think school segregation should be legalized again, and interracial marriage banned?  Or does her mind-reading abilities regarding the Founders make it "judicial activism" only if the Court examines laws that involve the rights of gay people?

Photograph of Maggie Gallagher courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Meet the New Bosses

How the Republicans would run the Senate.

It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice

The U.S. Is So, So Far Behind Europe on Clean Energy

Even if You Don’t Like Batman, You Might Like Gotham

Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom

The Eye

This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059

Medical Examiner

Did America Get Fat by Drinking Diet Soda?  

A high-profile study points the finger at artificial sweeteners.

A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull

Nicolas Sarkozy, Thrice Married, Says Gay Marriage Humiliates the Family

  News & Politics
Over There
Sept. 22 2014 1:29 PM “That’s Called Jim Crow” Philip Gourevitch on America’s hypocritical interventions in Africa.
  Business
Moneybox
Sept. 22 2014 1:37 PM Subprime Loans Are Back! And believe it or not, that’s a good thing.
  Life
Outward
Sept. 22 2014 4:45 PM Why Can’t the Census Count Gay Couples Accurately?
  Double X
Doublex
Sept. 22 2014 4:06 PM No, Women’s Soccer Does Not Have a Domestic Violence Problem Or, why it is very, very stupid to compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice.
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus
Sept. 22 2014 1:52 PM Tell Us What You Think About Slate Plus Help us improve our new membership program.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 22 2014 3:16 PM Watch the Best Part of Beyoncé and Jay Z’s On the Run Tour
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 22 2014 12:14 PM Family Court Rules That You Can Serve Someone With Legal Papers Over Facebook
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 22 2014 4:34 PM Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.