Why Is This Scandalous?

What Women Really Think
Oct. 29 2010 3:33 PM

Why Is This Scandalous?

/blogs/xx_factor/2010/10/29/what_did_christine_odonnell_do_thats_supposed_to_scandalize_us/jcr:content/body/slate_image

Hanna , I have to say that I believe the Gawker story about Christine O'Donnell getting drunk and making out with a dude. The pictures do seem pretty touchy-feely, and the way he describes her self-confidence dovetails with the O'Donnell we see on the campaign trail.  Most importantly, if you're going to make up a story about a hook-up, you'd say you went all the way.  I do believe that's in the Douchebag Handbook, in chapter 5: "Chicks, Bro".

Advertisement

My question is why on earth did Gawker run this pointless story?  Scratch that.  I know why-for the hits.  But do they actually think this discredits her in any way?  The person who looks bad is the guy sexist enough to slam a woman for being "aggressive", blames her pubic hair to cover up what many of us might otherwise describe as a hydraulics failure, and use the word "cougar" without a whiff of irony.

And if we're supposed to be scandalized because O'Donnell is wearing a short skirt with her ladybug costume, well, I have to point out that what she's wearing is practically a nun's habit compared with some ladybug costumes that are being pushed as appropriate fall weather clothing for Halloween.

I agree with you, Rachael . If O'Donnell owns this and smacks down the anonymous writer for this, it will probably work out well for her. (As Hanna points out, she's already got NOW backing her.) And I think she's well within her rights to out the author by name, since he told the world what she looks like naked.

Photograph by Chip Somodevilla for Getty Images.

Amanda Marcotte is a Brooklyn-based writer and DoubleX contributor. She also writes regularly for the Daily Beast, Alternet, and USA Today. Follow her on Twitter.