A Little Baby Einstein Never Hurt Anybody

What Women Really Think
Oct. 26 2009 3:31 PM

A Little Baby Einstein Never Hurt Anybody

KJ , I could not agree more with your post on the Baby Einstein refunds. There are so many edicts that come from parenting experts that new parents cannot possibly heed all of them. Which has prompted me to create a pop quiz for new parents:

Given that 1) You are not to let your baby cry, 2) you are not to let your child watch television, and 3) you must exclusively breast-feed your child for six months, what should you do when it’s time to cook dinner (you know, to get those extra calories you need to feed the baby)?

Rachael Larimore Rachael Larimore

Rachael Larimore is Slate's managing editor.


1) Hold Junior in one arm as you steam veggies, sauté salmon, and roast potatoes (that’s two hot liquids and one hot oven, if you’re counting) with the other.

2) Let Junior cry.

3) Expose Junior to some Mozart, Bach, or Beethoven.

The answer is so patently obvious that it’s annoying. (Please don’t respond that one parent can cook dinner while the other tends to baby. That ignores the realities of single-parent households, spouses working overtime and/or irregular shifts, or families with older siblings where one parent is cooking while the other is carpooling to soccer practice or piano lessons.) Almost as annoying to me as the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood. The anti-commercialism group posted a press release on its site, headlined "CCFC Victory! Disney Offers Refunds on Baby Einstein Videos."

Now, I don’t want to be too hard on the CCFC. They’ve pushed to keep Bratz dolls out of the Scholastic book clubs and book fairs, and they’re opposed to Channel One and other in-school television. (I’d much rather my kids have more instruction time during the school day.) They’ve got ideas for holiday gifts that don’t involve knocking over the nearest Toys R Us.

But their overarching message-that exposure to marketing and commercialism is ruinous to children-is patronizing to parents. They don’t like Elmo selling anything (never mind that that helps keep Sesame Street on the air commercial-free); they don’t like any TV shows with product tie-ins; they want to control what time studios are allowed to air commercials for PG-13 movies.

There’s a very easy way to keep your children from being exposed to too much commercialization. Limit their television. And tell them, " No , you may not have a toy every time we go to Target." CCFC points to the drastic increase in the amount of money spent on marketing to children in the last 25 years-from $100 million in 1983 to $17 billion today. We can argue chicken vs. egg all day, but companies probably wouldn’t spend that kind of money marketing products if it didn’t work. Parents need to take some responsibility and not just blame companies for trying to make money. And I can’t see where moderate exposure to marketing and commercials has to be hazardous to our children’s health. In our family, some of the best time we spend together is running around at the kid’s museum or the zoo or taking day trips to new places. And some of the best time is spent sprawled in front of the TV for family movie night. I can think of worse things than my son asking to be Buzz Lightyear for Halloween after watching Toy Story with mom and dad one too many times.



More Than Scottish Pride

Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 

What Charles Barkley Gets Wrong About Corporal Punishment and Black Culture

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge


The GOP’s Focus on Fake Problems

Why candidates like Scott Walker are building campaigns on drug tests for the poor and voter ID laws.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Is It Worth Paying Full Price for the iPhone 6 to Keep Your Unlimited Data Plan? We Crunch the Numbers.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 7:03 PM Kansas Secretary of State Loses Battle to Protect Senator From Tough Race
Sept. 16 2014 4:16 PM The iPhone 6 Marks a Fresh Chance for Wireless Carriers to Kill Your Unlimited Data
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 8:43 PM This 17-Minute Tribute to David Fincher Is the Perfect Preparation for Gone Girl
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 6:40 PM This iPhone 6 Feature Will Change Weather Forecasting
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.