If you're wondering why there isn't reliable polling data to help settle the question of whether the Iranian election was a farce, the Washington Post offers all sorts of (contradictory) opinions:
Ken Ballen and Patrick Doherty argue that reliable polling is possible, that they did it, and that the results were strongly in Ahmadinejad's favor. But Jon Cohen points out that their poll was completed in May, before the contest got really heated, and that even then more than half of the respondents said they hadn't made up their mind yet (so the 2:1 number Ballen and Doherty cite was only among people who had decided who they were voting for). Meanwhile, Mehdi Khalaji says "reputable polls" showed Ahmadinejad losing ground in the weeks before the election, but doesn't get specific.
TODAY IN SLATE
The Democrats’ War at Home
How can the president’s party defend itself from the president’s foreign policy blunders?
Congress’ Public Shaming of the Secret Service Was Political Grandstanding at Its Best
Michigan’s Tradition of Football “Toughness” Needs to Go—Starting With Coach Hoke
A Plentiful, Renewable Resource That America Keeps Overlooking
Windows 8 Was So Bad That Microsoft Will Skip Straight to Windows 10
Cringing. Ducking. Mumbling.
How GOP candidates react whenever someone brings up reproductive rights or gay marriage.
You Deserve a Pre-cation
The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.