Wild Things
Slate’s animal blog.

May 29 2015 10:50 AM

The Best Biologist on Twitter

Social media has been billed as a way to start conversations with anyone, but most people only speak with people just like themselves. It’s great for connecting those who like or think the same things, but not so good for exposing people to new perspectives. Especially new perspectives about things people misunderstand, fear, or hate.

David A. Steen, a wildlife ecologist, research fellow at the Alabama Natural Heritage Program at Auburn University, and occasional Slate contributor, is biology’s best social media ambassador. Steen’s Twitter presence—his handle is @AlongsideWild—is geared almost entirely toward breaking out of the social media echo chamber and politely confronting those in need of some outside information. Snake information.


Steen says he has always been interested in communicating with people curious about something they saw or heard in the wild even if they’re not necessarily interested in wildlife ecology and conservation. For years, Steen’s herpetological outreach was based on his blog, but the problem is that people have to actively surf or Google their way to it. (He also runs a great Facebook account, Living Alongside Wildlife.) With Twitter, he didn’t have to wait to be found.

Judging from social media, a person does one of two things upon sighting a snake. No. 1: Take a quick photo before fleeing in terror and posting the picture on social media, or No. 2: Murder the snake with a shovel or foot, take a picture, and then post it on social media.

By rule, in the case of a nonmurdered snake, the social media poster will ask the anonymous online masses what kind of snake it is. And by rule, some commenter will respond that it’s either a deadly cottonmouth or a copperhead. In the case of a murdered snake, the brave vanquisher will volunteer the cottonmouth or copperhead identification himself.

Of course, these snakes are almost never actually cottonmouths or copperheads, and David Steen is there to correct the record. There are more than 150 species of snakes in the United States, and the vast majority of them are completely harmless to humans. But just as every single shark is a great white, our nature-deprived populace views every slithering reptile as dead.

Steen takes upon his back the Atlas-ian burden of our nation’s snake misidentification crisis, tirelessly responding to strangers posting snake pictures on Twitter. He tells me he has set up alerts that ping keywords when people post about snakes, then he spends about an hour per night looking at the photos and scheduling responding tweets to be released throughout the day. The toughest part is getting the keywords right: He says many of the people tweeting about “copperheads” are actually tweeting lyrics to “Copperhead Road” by Steve Earle.

Steen has corrected thousands of snake questions or misidentifications on Twitter. His signature #NotACopperhead and #NotACottonmouth hashtags each bring up hundreds of responses to individual social media posts. And with such politeness! There’s no #snakeshaming here, rather a “beautiful!” compliment for a photo of a live snake, and a subtle “try asking me first next time” attending every photo from someone who killed the snake first. With every identification corrected and tweet retweeted, another citizen is exposed to the world of reptile science and disabused of reptile myths. He’s a modern-day St. Patrick, banishing snake misidentification from the land!

The posters are, for the most part, delighted and relieved to have a snake expert appear and answer their questions. Being followed on Twitter by those he corrects is a win for wildlife, because now these folks are exposed to information—correct information—about snakes.

This being social media, of course, some people are not so delighted. Some people are embarrassed that they killed something harmless instead of something dangerous, others are just certain that their ID is the correct one. Whatever the reason, he’s been called every bad name on Urban Dictionary. Thank goodness Twitter has a block function.

It’s tireless work on the front lines of the fight between nature and civilization. I don’t know of a more effective use of social media’s reach. Godspeed, David Steen; every squished garter snake is just another chance to spread the good word.

Video Advertisement

May 29 2015 10:22 AM

Chimps Hate Drones, Too

Not long ago, drones were having a moment—a good one. Now it’s hard to see them as anything other than what they are: at best the harmless-but-annoying whirring toys of amateur cinematographers, and at worst, well, ruthlessly efficient unmanned killing machines.

Now it seems as if that frustration with UAVs has evolved into something that spans species. Take the video above, for instance. In it, a quadcopter is flying over the Royal Burgers’ Zoo in the Netherlands, its camera recording the zoo-related sights and sounds from above. We see an elephant, tiger, and bear in all their captive glory before moving into the chimpanzee enclosure. It’s here that the cross-species drone rage comes to a head.


Either upset by how close it flew to its personal space, bored, or in protest of the human race’s growing obsession with unmanned aerial vehicles, a tool-using chimp immediately reaches out and bats the copter clear out of the sky with a stick. It's not only an incredibly satisfying moment in primate-human relations, it also proves, once and for all, the depths of our shared DNA.

May 22 2015 11:36 AM

A Lesson in Memorial Day Weekend Enjoyment From Luna and Mari

Sea otters live life as if on a never-ending vacation. The majority of their days are spent floating along in their trademark (and thoroughly relaxed-looking) reclined position, and the aquatic mammals eat, sleep, and mate in the water. They rarely come ashore, save for the occasional dry land snooze.

Sea otters also have a refined palate when it comes to diet. As they're often seen smashing open clams and mussels on their stomachs with rocks, their affinity for shellfish is well-established, but the rotating otter carte du jour also includes octopus, sea urchin, and fish.


Most importantly though (insofar as their relaxation tendencies), they’re not afraid to say yes to a good time. Take the video above. In it, the Shedd Aquarium’s semi-famous otter pup, Luna, meets fellow sea otter Mara for the first time. Watch as they feel each other out briefly before ducking and diving throughout the nursery pool like a couple of vacationers on a morning swim. And pay particularly close attention to when they flip over to their backs, leisurely drifting along as the Shedd trainers throw them treats to snack on.

If that’s not a fitting playbook to follow this summer, then I don’t know what is. Enjoy your Memorial Day weekend, everyone. Channel your inner sea otter.

May 20 2015 10:31 AM

The Chicken Dance

One morning last March, I stood alone on a roadside in Utah and watched some chickens dance. I had come a long way to find them, and the birds did not disappoint. They spun and strutted and chased each other around in a field. They snapped loud ping-pong noises from inflated sacks on their necks and I laughed, partly because it was a funny sound, and partly because there on the roadside it was almost impossible to believe that these chickens were at the center of the largest and most contentious conservation effort of the century.

The chickens were not domestic chickens, of course, but a related native species called the greater sage-grouse.


The plump grouse stay out of sight for the majority of the year, keeping low in the sage to avoid being seen by birds of prey or coyotes, but their spring mating dances give the males a chance to show off their finery. They puff up the white feathers around their neck, spread their pointy tail feathers, and grow out stringy feathers from the back of their heads that float like a comb-over in the wind. Males gather on flattened patches of ground called leks, where they repeatedly make their wobbly air sac calls, hoping to woo nearby females.

More than 16 million greater sage-grouse used to live in the sagebrush steppe that stretched from Washington and North Dakota down to New Mexico and Arizona. But just a few hundred years after the arrival of European settlers—who brought with them livestock and agriculture and invasive plants and, more recently, oil wells—sage-grouse populations have fallen dramatically to somewhere between 200,000 and 500,000 birds.

The sage-grouse is a sort of ambassador for a host of creatures that rely on the sagebrush ecosystem, many of them only found in the United States. An episode of PBS’s Nature airing May 20 called “The Sagebrush Sea”—which is great, you should watch it—highlights the surprising diversity in a landscape some call The Big Empty. It’s a landscape that, frankly, a lot of people are either completely unaware of or only know as “the stuff that guys on horseback chase each other through in Westerns.”

“The Sagebrush Sea” reveals that The Big Empty is actually bursting with charismatic life, each species evolved in its own way to live in this hardscrabble country. The hip-high sage plants have managed to thrive in the high desert by stretching their roots to the water table more than 12 feet below. Prairie dogs and jackrabbits skitter through the brush to avoid the drifting shadows of golden eagles and prairie falcons. Tiny owls pop out of underground burrows. Pronghorn migrate between seasonal ranges; they’re the second-fastest animal on Earth, evolved to outrun American cheetahs (!) that lived in this habitat until 12,000 years ago.

Two males chicken-dance on a lek in Utah.

Courtesy of Nicholas Lund

But it’s the sage-grouse that are at the center of the current controversy. As it became clear that their numbers were tumbling, conservationists petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to protect the birds under the Endangered Species Act. In 2010, Fish and Wildlife punted: It found that ESA listing was warranted, but it gave the birds a low priority, meaning they would wait years for protection. Lawsuits were filed, and Fish and Wildlife said it would come up with a better decision by September 2015.

Western states with lots of sagebrush, especially those enjoying the benefits of a massive increase in oil and gas production, believe that an ESA listing for the greater sage-grouse would be a headache, making it harder to expand in sagebrush habitat. In December 2014, Republicans in Congress tried to protect the oil industry from the birds by pushing through a ban on using federal funds to issue an ESA listing. Meanwhile, in order to head off a decision from Fish and Wildlife, states are working with the Bureau of Land Management, which controls 60 percent of current greater sage-grouse range, to develop plans of their own to conserve the bird’s habitat without the restrictions of the ESA. The first of those plans are already coming out, including a grouse-centric federal wildfire strategy released Tuesday by the Department of the Interior, though it’s uncertain how they’ll coexist with Fish and Wildlife’s court-ordered ESA mandate.

So while the male greater sage-grouse continue to visit their leks, American politicians keep up the dance on their own ancestral strutting grounds in Washington, D.C. The decisions made there in the next few months will shape the future of the greater sage-grouse and the American sage brush ecosystem. Watch “The Sagebrush Sea” this week, and maybe you’ll be inspired to take a seat next to me for these dancing chicken’s next recital.

May 15 2015 1:56 PM

African Wild Dogs Go Outside for the First Time  

African wild dogs are highly intelligent, pack-hunting canines, capable of stalking and taking down prey as large as full-grown wildebeests with Velociraptor-esque efficiency. These endangered canines, also known as painted dogs or Cape hunting dogs, live in the open plains of sub-Saharan Africa and have multicolored coats and large ears. 

Extremely social animals, the wild dogs operate as a family unit, with a monogamous breeding pair as patriarch and matriarch, and members of the pack caring for one another. Using advanced communication skills on the hunt and within the pack, they are, truly, fascinating and incredible animals. They’re also freaking adorable.


For evidence of the latter point, see the video above. In it, a litter of wild dog pups is released into the outdoor enclosure at their home at the Cincinnati Zoo for the first time. Watching them romping around the zoo's “big yard,” gleefully playing and exploring, it’s easy to notice just how social and intelligent they are, even at such a young age.

And, as one of the trainers snaps “Lucy, stop eating rocks!” from off screen, it’s also easy to see that despite their wild (and at times ferocious) nature, they’re still just, well, dogs. 

April 22 2015 7:47 AM

Shot on Location: Celebrate Earth Day With a Cinematic Homage

Wednesday is the 45th annual Earth Day, and according to the Earth Day Network, more than 1 billion people from 192 countries will participate in celebrations, activities, and events. This makes Earth Day the largest civic observance in the world. The video above is a simple homage to Earth's beauty courtesy of the storytelling medium that marries sight and sound with our desire for wonder and adventure: cinema. 

April 17 2015 12:54 PM

Elephants Really Never Forget

Excerpted from Elephant Don: The Politics of a Pachyderm Posse by Caitlin O’Connell. Out now from the University of Chicago Press.

In terms of cognitive processing, not only do elephants have the largest absolute brain size among land mammals, they also have the largest temporal lobe relative to body size of any animal, including humans. The temporal lobe is that portion of the cerebral cortex devoted to communication, language, spatial memory, and cognition. Given the temporal lobe’s relative size in the elephant, there is every reason to suspect that elephants may be capable of far more complex cognition than is currently understood or documented.


In fact, elephant brains contain as many cortical neurons as human brains and have larger pyramidal neurons (specialized neurons thought to play a key role in cognitive functions) than do humans, suggesting that elephants might have learning and memory skills superior to ours. On top of this, von Economo neurons (or spindle cells)—believed to be involved in social awareness and the ability to make quick decisions and thought to exist only in humans, great apes, and four species of dolphin—were recently discovered in elephant brains.

Considering that this long-lived, highly intelligent mammal has a huge temporal lobe, highly sophisticated neural circuitry, and the largest brain capacity relative to any other mammal, the elephant is a natural focus of cognition experiments. Scientists have made progress on assessing elephants’ visual, vocal, and olfactory discrimination, but other cognitive experimental questions are easier to pose than to investigate. Experimenting with elephants poses elephantine challenges. Scientists rely on white mice, zebra fish, and fruit flies as study animals for a reason—they are cheap to raise and house. It is easy to create a controlled environment for such experiments and to run repeated trials to generate robust data sets. Comparative cognition work has been done on pigeons, pigs, dogs, and primates, but scale up to a study with elephants and it becomes much more difficult to find enough study subjects and run repeated trials.

Researchers have managed to conduct pioneering studies using zoo elephants in the areas of hearing, sensitivity to vibrations, and self-awareness. Yet these three individual studies were limited to a sample size of one. (The self-awareness test was performed with three elephants but only one produced usable data.)

Scientists have long considered the ability to recognize oneself in a mirror to be an index of high cognitive ability and one that is associated with humans, apes, and other highly social animals. To pass the mirror test, an animal has to respond to its own reflection in ways that make clear it sees itself in the mirror, as opposed to thinking it sees another animal of the same species. In the classic test, the experimenter surreptitiously applies a mark or sticker to the study subject, then presents the animal with a mirror. If on seeing its reflection the animal looks for the sticker or mark on its own body, it passes the test.

Two such experiments were done on Asian elephants to determine whether visible or both visible and concealed markings would be explored by elephants in front of a mirror. Neither of the two elephants in the first study reacted to their reflections. In the second study, one out of three subjects explored visible markings on her forehead, an indication she knew she was looking at a reflection of herself and not at another elephant. Although not as indisputable as the responses of great apes, the results were significant enough to warrant further investigation. Perhaps future experiments affording the opportunity for elephants to explore the mirror outside of circumscribed testing times, such as incorporating mirrors into elephant enclosures, would allow more individuals to respond, thereby leading to a stronger result. Such modifications may well demonstrate more definitively that elephants have a concept of self. In the meantime, these same researchers have shown the elephant’s ability to empathize with the misfortune of another and console the other after a traumatizing event (similar to what we often see with an older sister or aunt when a baby gets stuck in the mud or is accidentally separated from the group).

To explore elephant cognitive ability, a colleague and I devised a test for Donna, a trained African elephant subject at the Oakland Zoo that had participated in our studies on the role of vibrations in elephant communication a few years back. I also brought in some colleagues who knew more about this field than I did: Francis Steen and Dwight Read from the University of California–Los Angeles. Together with the staff at the Oakland Zoo, we hoped to assess elephant cognition in two phases. First, we needed to establish whether elephants could recognize a picture of an object (say, a banana) as a representation of an actual banana. Next, we needed to show whether elephants presented with a picture of that banana could use the symbol to accurately predict the location of an actual food reward— in this case, a real, live banana. Retrieving the food reward would require Donna to both recognize that the picture of a banana stood for a real banana and think ahead and make a plan in order to retrieve the fruit. Could she do it?

A central feature of higher-level cognitive ability to plan is the ability to stay focused on a goal or object when there are no reinforcing cues. For most animals, once an object is out of sight (or smell, or hearing) it is literally out of mind. Our own capacity to generate mental images of things we remember seeing may have evolved in response to continuing selective pressure. The ability to formulate, test, and carry out individual plans of action may have given our species an advantage.

When designing tests of cognitive ability, it’s important to differentiate between an ingrained magnetic or olfactory sense, such as what insects, turtles, and birds might use to navigate (path integration), and an actual cognitive use of memory, with referential images of migratory paths that passed a favorite fruit tree or seasonal water pan. The ability to treat a representation (a picture of a banana, for example) as if it were the real thing (an actual banana) is required to form a mental simulation, in which inferences are generated from a memory stimulated by the picture.

As I wheeled that first wheelbarrow of bananas toward Donna’s enclosure, I knew the process of investigating the cognitive capacity of elephants would be a long one. Testing their ability to recognize representations of objects would be an important first step in showing that elephants might be candidates for the kind of higher thinking called cognition. Showing recognition of objects alone wouldn’t make a strong case. But before I could plan out the whole series of experiments, I needed to see if this first one would work. And if so, I hoped to be in a position to pursue the question of elephant cognition with Donna, one wheelbarrow of bananas at a time, wherever it might take us.

Once Donna had acquired the skill of touching targets with her trunk in response to an experimental stimulus, we began the study with our first challenge. We attached photographs to the targets and trained Donna to touch the relevant photo on the left or right target when a piece of fruit, either a banana or an apple was presented in front of her. She was allowed to eat the fruit if she selected the correct photograph.

Many, many bananas later, we began to realize Donna, at least, was not the most enthusiastic study subject. This was unexpected because she had become an expert in touching targets in response to vibrational cues and actually appeared to enjoy the challenge. But when asked to make decisions about a photograph and engage in visual discrimination, Donna was clearly not paying much attention at all, although she was clearly enjoying her banana windfall.

Donna’s trainer, Colleen, had to wave her hand in front of Donna’s eyes constantly and snap her fingers to get her to pay attention and actually consider the photos. Donna would lift her heavy eyelids for a few moments, look up at the photos, and then plunk her banana- smeared trunk tip indiscriminately onto an image, breathing out heavily. Banana breath and banana slobber showered the photos as well as ourselves. We could tell that Donna was trying to discover the rules of the new game but was having trouble figuring out what we wanted her to do—to make a visual choice, either between a banana and a blank white image or between an image of a banana or an apple.


Every once in a while, we’d test Donna’s focus by swapping out her banana treat for an apple when she got an answer correct. Now that got her attention. She immediately opened her dozy eyes wide and looked around confused as to why the protocol of her getting fed a continuous stream of bananas had suddenly been switched to something else. Our testing did not progress nearly as quickly as we had hoped. Part of the problem may have been that elephants don’t use vision as their primary sensory input. They tend to smell or hear something first and only then train their sight on it. So we had a difficult time getting Donna to focus on our lovely photographs of plump and juicy fruit.

Eventually, though, Donna got the hang of this new challenge and was finally succeeding at selecting the correct photograph more often than would be due to chance. We decided she was ready to be trained for the next phase of the experiment.

In the second phase, the goal was to test Donna’s ability to plan by presenting her with a photograph of a hidden item, such as a pumpkin (a favorite treat). The photograph would incorporate cues of its location that were familiar to Donna, such as the 50-gallon drum that dangled in the bull yard or a favorite tree stump out in the exhibit enclosure. If Donna responded to the image of the pumpkin by searching for it, this would be evidence that she might be capable of using mental imagery to formulate plans.

The critical factor here would be if Donna’s search were initiated (and perhaps sustained) based on her mental image of a pumpkin rather than on visual or olfactory cues. That is, we would need to make sure to distinguish between, for example, a dog’s act of searching for the source of a smell and an elephant searching for a pumpkin based entirely on its depiction and not on being smelled or on a sighting of the actual object. And to rule out olfactory cues altogether, we’d hide a picture of the pumpkin, and only present a real pumpkin as a treat for finding the photograph. If Donna were truly able to evoke the image of the pumpkin on her own without any prompting either by photograph or by smell, then cognitive scientists out there would be satisfied that Donna had indeed engaged in cognitive thinking. That’s a lot of work, but it’s the only way to move from anecdote to experimental proof, even though anyone that knows elephants in the wild can imagine them moving north after the rains, heading on a path that they always take, knowing exactly where the marula trees are, and when the fruit would be ripe, all of which seems to demonstrate cognitive thinking.

As Donna sucked on her umpteenth banana, I contemplated a debate among cognitive psychologists over the definition of cognition in general and then, specifically, in relation to whether bees were capable of cognitive processing, as, for example, in the interpretation of the famous waggle dance (a figure-eight dance used as a form of communication by honeybees). The cognition community was turned upside down by the question of whether individual bees, in all of their mental processing ability, could be considered to have cognition. The flurry of discussion came when skepticism was voiced that creatures without backbones were capable of possessing this capacity to any degree. And at the same time, there were cognitive scientists who supported the idea that robots had cognitive ability. The field obviously needed a definition of cognition that could apply as well to people and primates and dolphins as it could to robots and bees and elephants.

Hence the debate continued over an official definition of the term “cognition” and the concept of reference—whether the representation of a real object could interact internally with another representation of reality. In other words, whether viewing the image of an object could stimulate a mental image of the same object—that is, whether the picture of a banana would cause Donna to imagine a real banana. The results didn’t give us confidence that we were going to get definitive answers quickly, but since Donna connected the act of touching the image of a banana with a banana reward at a rate slightly higher than chance, this suggested she might actually be thinking and not just enjoying the taste of bananas.

Reprinted with permission from Elephant Don: The Politics of a Pachyderm Posse by Caitlin O’Connell, published by the University of Chicago Press. © 2015 by the University of Chicago. All rights reserved.

April 14 2015 3:05 PM

Mountain Lion P-22, Paparazzi Victim

A male mountain lion lives in Griffith Park, an oasis of semi-natural habitat within Los Angeles. The big cat, dubbed P-22, has gotten a certain amount of fame; he has even graced the cover of National Geographic. Sometime Monday, P-22 decided to go hang out in the crawl space under a house in Los Feliz, a Los Angeles neighborhood bordering the park.

The story of P-22 is the story of survival. Griffith Park is surrounded by concrete and swimming pools. The mountain lion somehow managed to cross two of the nation’s busiest freeways—a total of 16 lanes of traffic—to safely land in the park. At least three others have died trying.


He has mostly managed to stay away from the prying eyes of people for the three years or so that he’s made the park his home. Then, last March, camera trap photos revealed that he was suffering from mange, likely because he ate a small mammal that had eaten rat poison. Researchers provided medical care, and by May of 2014, new camera trap photos indicated that he seemed to be recovering.

Mountain lion P-22 photographed by a camera trap.

Courtesy of Griffith Park Connectivity Study

Now he’s managed to get himself into a sticky situation yet again.

The Los Angeles Times reported that Monday afternoon, a pair of workers installing a security system on the house came face to face with a very big cat. They informed the homeowners, who called the city, which then informed the state of California.

By mid-day, several reporters were on the scene along with a film crew from NBC. They were there to report on the efforts by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and Los Angeles Animal Services to coax the cougar out of the crawl space and back into Griffith Park.

Once word got out that the animal holed up under the house was indeed the famous mountain lion, more and more news trucks and reporters showed up, all eager to catch a glimpse of the Los Angeles mascot. Helicopters flew overhead. Wildlife officials agreed that all the commotion would make it unlikely for the cat to leave on its own, so they blocked its exit and decided to wait until night fell.

Once it became dark, they reopened the entrance to the crawl space. They expected the cat to run into the wooded area adjacent to the house and eventually find his way back to the park. “It’ll be like a fur-covered rocket,” one official told reporters.

I know that’s what he said because I could hear it. NBC was livestreaming footage of the scene online, and everything could be heard, including inane commentary from some of the reporters (“Do you think he looks like this emoji?”) on site who seemed not to remember that the cameras were on.

And then the news media became part of the story itself. Instead of asking the camera crew and the reporters to move away—or at least to keep their noise down and lights off—the wildlife officials monitoring the situation allowed NBC to keep its cameras rolling and its lights shining, and all the reporters (from NBC and elsewhere) loudly chattering away just outside of the crawl space. Not a pleasant scene for a stressed-out cat.

What quickly became apparent was that NBC was running the show. It was as if the entire operation was intended to create compelling television rather than to maximize the welfare of the animal. One strategy to provoke the cat’s exit was to poke it with a long pole—but not before the camera operator could attach a GoPro to it. Then came the tennis ball launcher. (“His ears are perked up but he’s not doing anything.”) And then the beanbag bullets, which were also ineffective.

For anyone with a background in wildlife and animal behavior (and based on Twitter and Facebook comments, even for those without), it was clear that the cat was going to stay exactly where it was.

I had to wonder whether the wildlife officials were using increasingly aversive methods mainly because sit-and-wait doesn’t make for good TV. In the end, that’s what wildlife officials finally agreed to do, stopping their increasingly futile efforts just short of tranquilizing the cat. “He’s not hurting anyone in there, at some point he’s going to come out,” said homeowner Jason Archinaco.

“I showed up to the scene to see if I could be of service to the biologists,” said Miguel Ordeñana, a mammal researcher at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles who discovered the first photo of P-22 on a Griffith Park camera trap. “I was appalled at how the media was managed.”

Most upsetting, he told me, was the general attitude on the balcony just outside the crawl space. “At one point, [they were] even joking about handing the tennis ball launcher to the homeowner to give it a try. Even if the right strategy was to coax him out, they shouldn’t be doing anything other than whispering and allowing only the few necessary trained professionals near the crawl space viewing area.”

At 9:25 Tuesday morning, the homeowner tweeted confirmation that National Park Service researchers established using radio telemetry that P-22 had left the house, on his own, sometime overnight. Which surprises nobody.

In a city like Los Angeles, with its matrix of urban and wild landscapes, conflicts between humans and wildlife are inevitable. What is instead surprising is just how rare those interactions are. P-22 has survived more than three years in heavily used Griffith Park and would likely have gone undetected for a long time if not for the camera trap system set up by researchers. Indeed, what is unusual is not necessarily that the cat spent the day under a house, but that anybody even noticed. As a University of California Santa Cruz mountain lion researcher told a reporter, “they’re professionally secretive; they hide all the time.”

Wild animals in big cities already face so many human threats: roads, cars, pollution, habitat loss, climate change. Must we now add the news media to that list?

In the best cases, the media can help people connect with nature in a positive way, helping them understand and appreciate it. Monday night, journalists acted as paparazzi, participating instead in the harassment and exploitation of a distressed animal. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife ought to review yesterday’s footage and develop new policies that make ensuring animal welfare their top priority, rather than facilitating cheap entertainment.

The better way to see wildlife: through a camera-trap image. Mountain lion P-19, a female, lives in the Santa Monica Mountains.

Courtesy of Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area via Facebook

April 3 2015 12:22 PM

Evolution’s Oddest Eggs

Whatever creative egg-decorating plans you may have for Easter, I guarantee birds already have it beat. Over the course of 150 million years or so of evolution, birds have adapted to fill just about every ecological niche on the planet, and in the process they’ve developed some surprising strategies for reproduction. Here are five of nature’s most interesting, innovative, and bizarre bird eggs.

1. Common murres are seabirds (related to puffins) that lay their eggs on bare rock on narrow ledges on the sides of cliffs. You’d think the eggs would roll off the edge and be lost or smashed every time mom or dad accidentally bumped into them. To solve this problem, murre eggs are exceptionally pointy so that if one gets jostled, it doesn’t roll away anywhere—it just wobbles around in a circle. They’re also marked with distinctive patterns of spots and splotches, which help murre parents pick out their own eggs from everyone else’s in their dense nesting colonies.

A common murre colony.

Courtesy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


2. Kiwis lay the biggest eggs in relation to body size of any bird—each egg is around 20 percent of the mother’s total body weight. It takes a female kiwi a month to produce a single egg, and in the final days the developing egg takes up so much space inside her body that she can’t even eat. The advantage is that kiwi chicks don’t require much parental care. By the time they’ve used up all the nutrition stored in their yolk sacs, newly hatched chicks are already fully feathered and ready to go.

3. Common cuckoos are “nest parasites,” meaning they can’t be bothered to build their own nests, instead sneaking their eggs into the nests of other birds. They’ve been documented to exploit more than 100 other bird species as “hosts.” Different lineages of cuckoos have even specialized on specific host birds, laying eggs whose appearance closely matches those of their targets, making it more difficult for parasitized parent birds to realize they are incubating and protecting foreign eggs and, after they hatch, feeding intruder cuckoo chicks. Over time, host parents have gotten better and better at recognizing impostor cuckoo eggs in their nests, prompting cuckoos to lay more convincing fakes, in a classic evolutionary arms race.

4. Hoopoes … well, this one is kind of gross. Hoopoes are gorgeous Eurasian birds with a distinctive crown and the delightful scientific name Upupa epops. They paint their eggs with smelly brown fluid from a gland near their rear ends. Birds normally use the oils secreted by the uropygial gland to preen their feathers, but hoopoes are unique in that their uropygial secretions are full of bacteria. They smear the surfaces of their eggs with this microbial goo, and researchers have found that this actually reduces the amount of harmful bacteria inside the eggs, with the friendly uropygial bacteria acting as a sort of shield.

5. Tinamous have eggs worthy of even the choosiest Easter bunny, with shells in bright, shimmering colors that can appear to change as you look at them. The shy, turkey-size South American birds are the only animal known to lay eggs that are iridescent. The cuticle, or outermost layer, of a tinamou egg has special characteristics at the nanostructural level that affect how it reflects light. This “structural coloration” plus pigment produces colorful, glossy eggshells. (Full disclosure: I’m acquainted with one of the scientists who worked on the iridescent eggs research.) Why secretive tinamous need such Technicolor eggs remains a mystery.

If you need a little inspiration for last-minute Easter decorating, hopefully the world’s pointiest, bulkiest, sneakiest, smelliest, and shiniest eggs will give you some ideas. (Although it would probably be best not to emulate the hoopoe.) Next time you crack an egg of the chicken variety, pause for a moment to remember its wild cousins and marvel at how weird nature can be.

Murre eggs harvested in Alaska in 1985.

Courtesy of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

April 1 2015 12:28 PM

Rules for the Black Birdwatcher

I’m an ornithologist and wildlife ecology professor at Clemson University. I’ve been a birder since the second grade. Birds are my vehicle for appreciating nature and the vital ecological, psychological, and spiritual connections that intersect between feathers, flight, wonder, and wings. In my fascination and worship of all things avian, I’m joined by millions who appreciate the importance that birds play in all our lives. I list a multitude of birders among my closest friends and kindred spirits. Those fellow “bird nerds” make my life richer and contribute to social aspects of birding that just make it a damn fun thing to do!

“Nine Rules for the Black Birdwatcher” is a piece I originally wrote for Orion magazine, now adapted into the video above. It’s my satirical take on some of the challenges I’ve faced as a birder who just happens to be a relative rarity among the largely white flock. My hope is that the Nine Rules somehow move us into conversations about how to make the environment and conservation more colorful both in composition and consideration.


Video produced by Ari Daniel. Videography by Amanda Kowalski. A BirdNote Production.