Sarah Palin Endorses Three Guys Who Might Be Senators Soon

Weigel
Reporting on Politics and Policy.
March 13 2014 3:32 PM

Sarah Palin Endorses Three Guys Who Might Be Senators Soon

477333423-conservative-pundit-television-personality-and-former
Sarah Palin has to do something to fill the hours that aren't taken up by parody-Dr.-Seuss storytime at CPAC.

Photo by T.J. Kirkpatrick/Getty Images

It's been eight years since she won an election, but the media must pay heed to Sarah Palin's candidate endorsements. For starters, candidates desparately want them. Why? The media will cover them. It's a sort of Möbius strip, but it's what we have to work with. So many narratives are served by this process—the "Tea Party is costing Republicans the majority" narrative, the "Tea Party not dead" narrative, to name just two tropes.

Today, on Facebook, Palin announced her backing of Chris McDaniel in Misssissippi's Senate primary, T.W. Shannon in Oklahoma's Senate primary, and Ben Sasse in Nebraska's Senate primary. These represent a sort of evolution in the Palin Endorsement, the power of which depends on picking the right time to jump in and take credit.

Advertisement

Palin's 2012 endorsement of Ted Cruz for Senate used to be our best example. From the start of the race to the time Palin endorsed, Cruz had already surged from 11 percent to 26 percent in polling. He'd already been backed by Jim DeMint and the Club for Growth, the latter spending $4.8 million on the underfunded challenger. But it's the Palin endorsement that is popularly credited with Cruzmentum, something Cruz himself has helped by appearing at CPAC to thank Palin for her work. (I'm not saying she didn't help, only that thanking Republican populist Sarah Palin plays better than thanking the donors to the Club for Growth.)

Sasse's in a similar position to where Cruz was. He's running for an open seat in a state where the Democrats can't find a serious challenger. He started at the back—he'd never run for office before—and has surged to, at worst, a rising second place in a three-candidate field. The Club for Growth has started swinging for him. Now he's Palin's candidate, too.

McDaniel's a slightly riskier pick. He's challenging Sen. Thad Cochran, so Palin's putting herself against the Senate Republicans, insofar as anyone cares about that. He got into the race after the Club for Growth spent money on ads against the incumbent, in the hope (at first) that the guy would just retire. Polling's been sparse and hard to read, but in the best Cochran poll the guy was up 23 points.

T.W. Shannon's not surging yet—Palin's an early adopter in that race. But the Oklahoma contest, so far, pits a congressman who generally gets along with House leadership (Rep. James Lankford) against T.W. Shannon, the African-American speaker of the House. This is an easy choice—a 36-year old African-American in the Senate, someone from a safe red state who can serve for years or ascend to executive office. The Club for Growth hasn't endorsed yet, but is expected to, and would be tasked with cutting away at a huge Lankford lead over a three-month campaign.

That's the field. Palin has chosen wisely, avoiding races where there's no real infrastructure in place to create an upset win. Her only loser pick, so far this year, was of Tea Party activist Katrina Pierson in her congressional bid against Rep. Pete Sessions. But that felt like a box-checking exercise. If an insurgent is going to win, he needs the Club, Palin, and a few other groups in his cosmos.

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics