Whatever's in This Ryan-Murray Budget Deal, Conservatives Are Against It

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Dec. 10 2013 11:40 AM

Whatever's in This Ryan-Murray Budget Deal, Conservatives Are Against It

Hey, it's Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., and Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., presumably whispering the secret details of their deal.

Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

On Dec. 5, Kansas Republican Milton Wolf announced his opposition to the Murray-Ryan (or, if you're being technical, budget conference committee) deal. If he won his 2014 primary for U.S. Senate, he'd oppose such a deal.

I oppose the terms of the Murray-Ryan budget deal that are being reported in the news media.  The bill would reportedly increase spending by billions of dollars, fund ObamaCare, and sneak in a backdoor tax increase by raising fees.  Anytime a politician tells you ‘spending increases will be offset by savings elsewhere’ we always get hit with the additional spending, and we never see the savings.  If I were in the U.S. Senate today I would vote against this deal.

When I read that, I scrambled to find news on the emerging deal. There wasn't any: The deal had not been finalized. But there's been a micro-trend here, of conservatives pre-condemning any deal that raises spending levels from the sequestration level or increases taxes.

Increasing spending is not their sole motivator in these budget negotiations – they’re also seeking to pave the way for immigration reform, which these days is Washington code for amnesty.

The plan has not been released yet.

On behalf of more than two million Americans for Prosperity activists in all 50 states, I write to urge you to vote NO vote on any legislation that exceeds the discretionary budget authority for any portion of fiscal year 2014 above $967 billion, the level that was already agreed to in the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA), as modified by subsequent fiscal legislation. AFP opposes legislation that raises discretionary spending without offsetting the increase with other spending cuts.

I urge you to vote NO on legislation providing funds for fiscal year 2014 that exceeds $967 billion. Americans for Prosperity will include this vote in our congressional scorecard. 

The plan has not been released yet.

David Weigel, a former Slate politics reporter, is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics


Medical Examiner

Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola

Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.

It Is Very, Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice

The U.S. Is So, So Far Behind Europe on Clean Energy

Even if You Don’t Like Batman, You Might Like Gotham

Friends Was the Last Purely Pleasurable Sitcom

The Eye

This Whimsical Driverless Car Imagines Transportation in 2059


Meet the New Bosses

How the Republicans would run the Senate.

A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull

How Moscow’s Anti-War March Revealed One of Russia’s Deepest Divides

  News & Politics
Sept. 22 2014 6:30 PM What Does It Mean to Be an American? Ted Cruz and Scott Brown think it’s about ideology. It’s really about culture.
Sept. 22 2014 5:38 PM Apple Won't Shut Down Beats Music After All (But Will Probably Rename It)
Sept. 22 2014 4:45 PM Why Can’t the Census Count Gay Couples Accurately?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 22 2014 7:43 PM Emma Watson Threatened With Nude Photo Leak for Speaking Out About Women's Equality
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus
Sept. 22 2014 1:52 PM Tell Us What You Think About Slate Plus Help us improve our new membership program.
Brow Beat
Sept. 22 2014 7:46 PM Azealia Banks’ New Single Is Her Best in Years
Future Tense
Sept. 22 2014 6:27 PM Should We All Be Learning How to Type in Virtual Reality?
  Health & Science
Medical Examiner
Sept. 22 2014 4:34 PM Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.