The Hillary Clinton Knockout Game

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Dec. 10 2013 11:15 AM

The Hillary Clinton Knockout Game

Six-odd weeks ago, the radio host and author Hugh Hewitt stumbled across the first great gotcha question of the 2016 campaign. His guest was New York-based Politico reporter Maggie Haberman, one of the people tilling the soil early on the Hillary beat. His question: Name some stuff Clinton achieved as Secretary of State.

David Weigel David Weigel

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics

"I think that the folks around her believe that among the biggest achievements was, and you’ve seen this pointed to a lot, was the amount of travel time she logged," Haberman said. "They felt very good about the Chinese dissident, and how the disposition of that case went in 2012."


Hewitt wouldn't let go. "Pause for a moment with me on the achievement side," he said. "Articulate further. What is it that people say is her achievement? That she logged a lot of miles? What, is she running for George Clooney’s role in Up In The Air?" Haberman gave him some more verbiage about what Clintonworld might be worried about. "I’m just curious as to what they think her strengths are, other than, you know, frequent flyer miles," said Hewitt. Haberman kept struggling to give a polite answer.

"She occupied the State Department, and there’s nothing to show for it," said the host. "I guess there’s this Chinese dissident, but I’m, that’s not, that’s not a name that’s tripping off of my tongue right now." (The answer, of course, is 陈光诚.)

I don't see evidence that many reporters saw this interview, but Hewitt did beat the trend and shape the "narrative." Last week, Politico's Susan Glasser captured the new "what did Hillary achieve?" meme by quoting liberally from conservatives (who had an incredible record of foreign policy success from 2001 to 2009, obviously, with far fewer casualties than were recorded in Benghazi) and compartmentalizing Clinton's allies. "Clinton’s advocates tend to come in several camps," she wrote, "which can be broadly summed up as The Timing Just Wasn’t Right group; the Blame the White Housers; and the Asia Pivot Was a Really Big Deal crowd." Old CW: Clinton was a good secretary of state. New CW: Clinton hacks were trying to come up with a way to sell her as a good secretary of state.

Glasser, in her previous role atop Foreign Policy, had run pieces as long as one year ago that made the "Hillary: Not that great" case. But it's one thing to make the argument in a contrarian wonk magazine, and another to make it on Washington's assignment desk. Hewitt, meanwhile, had a stumper for any of his guests from the mainstream media. He tried it out on Mark Leibovich when the New York Times magazine writer appeared on his show last week.

HH: how would you describe Hillary Clinton’s achievements as Secretary of State?
ML: Geez. Look, I think, I don’t cover the State Department. Look, you have that look on your face like you expect me to duck this question.
HH: No, I expect you not to be able to say anything, because she didn’t do anything.
ML: I actually didn’t, I don’t, here’s the deal. I have not written any stories on Hillary Clinton since 2008. How about, what’s like the graceful way to duck a question?
HH: Not even duck, just as if we’re playing Jeopardy!.
ML: Yeah, I honestly don’t know.
HH: Nobody can come up with anything, Mark.
ML: Yeah, let’s see. What did she do? I mean, she traveled a lot. That’s the thing. They’re always like, well, she logged eight zillion miles. It’s like, since when did that become like diplomacy by odometer?

Every one of my nerves starts flaring when, in 2013, we beltway hacks talk about 2016's presidential race. Who's that excited to start covering 15-minute speeches in Greenville and Pella and Concord again? I just point this out because Clinton, once again, is experiencing the agony of the long-distance frontrunner, enduring hundreds of news cycles based on new conventional wisdom, because to hang on too long to the old conventional wisdom makes for dull copy. (And it does! I was sick of "Clinton traveled a lot" stories, too.)

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics



The Self-Made Man

The story of America’s most pliable, pernicious, irrepressible myth.

The GOP Senate Candidate in Iowa Doesn’t Want Voters to Know Just How Conservative She Really Is

Does Your Child Have “Sluggish Cognitive Tempo”? Or Is That Just a Disorder Made Up to Scare You?

Naomi Klein Is Wrong

Multinational corporations are doing more than governments to halt climate change.

The Strange History of Wives Gazing at Their Husbands in Political Ads


See Me

Transparent is the fall’s only great new show.


Lena Dunham, the Book

More shtick than honesty in Not That Kind of Girl.

Rehtaeh Parsons Was the Most Famous Victim in Canada. Now, Journalists Can’t Even Say Her Name.

Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD

The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
Sept. 30 2014 12:04 PM John Hodgman on Why He Wore a Blue Dress to Impersonate Ayn Rand
  News & Politics
Sept. 30 2014 2:36 PM This Court Erred The Supreme Court has almost always sided with the wealthy, the privileged, and the powerful.
Building a Better Workplace
Sept. 30 2014 1:16 PM You Deserve a Pre-cation The smartest job perk you’ve never heard of.
Sept. 30 2014 1:48 PM Thrashed Florida State’s new president is underqualified and mistrusted. But here’s how he can turn it around.
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 30 2014 12:34 PM Parents, Get Your Teenage Daughters the IUD
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 30 2014 11:42 AM Listen to Our September Music Roundup Hot tracks from a cooler month, exclusively for Slate Plus members.
Brow Beat
Sept. 30 2014 12:42 PM How to Save Broken Mayonnaise
Future Tense
Sept. 30 2014 2:38 PM Scientists Use Electrical Impulses to Help Paralyzed Rats Walk Again
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 30 2014 7:30 AM What Lurks Beneath the Methane Lakes of Titan?
Sports Nut
Sept. 28 2014 8:30 PM NFL Players Die Young. Or Maybe They Live Long Lives. Why it’s so hard to pin down the effects of football on players’ lives.