The Manichean relationship between Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen and his occasional readers on the Internet is perhaps summed up best by a series of 2013 Gawker headlines. From time to time, the replacement-level punditry of Cohen includes (or is entirely based on) some sexist or racist trope. The Internet, often led by Gawker, notices.
So, today, a Cohen column about ... I'm not sure, something about "taking the Internet express to Iowa" to muse about 2016, is given the Hamilton Nolan headline "Richard Cohen has written something insane about interracial marriage." This follows in the steps of:
That last column was part of Cohen's short-lived outrage over Edward Snowden's leaks. Months later, Cohen wrote a piece about how he'd been wrong about Snowden. This got plenty of traffic and buzz, but emphasized Cohen's role in the media firmament. He's not terribly bright or influential. (You don't see him in those posses of columnists ushered in to meet with the president). He is what I will term an Outrage Muppet: He exists to make the Internet angry.
This isn't a new role. Decades ago, the Outrage Muppet would appear on The Morton Downey, Jr. Show or talk radio, to say incindiary or ignorant things. The self-selected audience would get cathartically angry. Nothing's changed since then, except the ever-easier access to offensive material. To steal a line from a friend: Twitter getting angry at someone is like a congressman saying a prayer. It's a meaningless ritual that needs a hook.
TODAY IN SLATE
How Canada’s Shooting Tragedies Have Shaped Its Gun Control Politics
Where Ebola Lives Between Outbreaks
Gunman Killed Inside Canadian Parliament; Soldier Shot at National Monument Dies
Sleater-Kinney Was Once America’s Best Rock Band
Can it be again?
Paul Farmer: Up to 90 Percent of Ebola Patients Should Survive
Is he right?
“I’m Not a Scientist” Is No Excuse
Politicians brag about their ignorance while making ignorant decisions.
Driving in Circles
The autonomous Google car may never actually happen.