Read the Newest Court Ruling That Shreds Campaign Finance Limits

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
Oct. 25 2013 12:59 PM

Read the Newest Court Ruling That Shreds Campaign Finance Limits

It's an A1 New York Times story, but I'm not seeing this story about a campaign finance-gutting decision being talked about elsewhere. That's strange, becuase it's not like the 2nd Circuit panel's decision to allow unlimited donations to one independent group merely looks like the case before SCOTUS. The same Alabama donor, Shaun McCutcheon, is at the center of both cases. Here, he wants to give $200,000 to the New York Progress and Protection PAC in order to run ads against all-but-certain next mayor Bill de Blasio.

The Supreme Court held in Citizens United v. FEC that the government has no anti-corruption interest in limiting independent expenditures. 558 U.S. 310, 357-61 (2010). It follows that a donor to an independent expenditure committee such as NYPPP is even further removed from political candidates and may not be limited in his ability to contribute to such committees. All federal circuit courts that have addressed this issue have so held... The hardship faced by NYPPP and its donors from the  denial of relief is significant. Every sum that a donor is forbidden to contribute to NYPPP because of this statute  reduces constitutionally protected political speech. Much of the district court’s analysis of hardship focuses on hardship to the election system arising from the timing of this suit and this motion for a preliminary injunction. But as the Supreme Court has emphasized, the value of political speech is at its zenith at election time.
Advertisement

Judge Dennis Jacobs, a George H.W. Bush appointee, makes an argument that could be heard again if SCOTUS rules for McCutcheon. The difference is that the SCOTUS case deals with donations to party committees, which are anachronistically (in the age of super PACs) capped. An argument can be made that freeing up the wealthy to fund parties would dial back the power of the outside groups. But in court, the Citizens United precedent is enough to take away limits on independent expenditures and on parties, with only individual prudence stopping the wealthy from pouring money down both spigots.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

TODAY IN SLATE

Politics

Blacks Don’t Have a Corporal Punishment Problem

Americans do. But when blacks exhibit the same behaviors as others, it becomes part of a greater black pathology. 

I Bought the Huge iPhone. I’m Already Thinking of Returning It.

Scotland Is Just the Beginning. Expect More Political Earthquakes in Europe.

Lifetime Didn’t Think the Steubenville Rape Case Was Dramatic Enough

So they added a little self-immolation.

Two Damn Good, Very Different Movies About Soldiers Returning From War

Medical Examiner

The Most Terrifying Thing About Ebola 

The disease threatens humanity by preying on humanity.

Students Aren’t Going to College Football Games as Much Anymore, and Schools Are Getting Worried

The Good Wife Is Cynical, Thrilling, and Grown-Up. It’s Also TV’s Best Drama.

  News & Politics
Weigel
Sept. 20 2014 11:13 AM -30-
  Business
Business Insider
Sept. 20 2014 6:30 AM The Man Making Bill Gates Richer
  Life
Quora
Sept. 20 2014 7:27 AM How Do Plants Grow Aboard the International Space Station?
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 19 2014 4:58 PM Steubenville Gets the Lifetime Treatment (And a Cheerleader Erupts Into Flames)
  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Sept. 19 2014 12:00 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? The Slatest editor tells us to read well-informed skepticism, media criticism, and more.
  Arts
Brow Beat
Sept. 20 2014 1:52 PM Julian Casablancas’ New Album Sounds Like the Furthest Thing From the Strokes
  Technology
Future Tense
Sept. 19 2014 6:31 PM The One Big Problem With the Enormous New iPhone
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 20 2014 7:00 AM The Shaggy Sun
  Sports
Sports Nut
Sept. 18 2014 11:42 AM Grandmaster Clash One of the most amazing feats in chess history just happened, and no one noticed.