My latest piece on the Great Shutdown of 2013 asks whether the long-term political gamesmanship of the House Republicans makes any sense. In lieu of getting their bills through the Senate, Republicans are passing "mini-CRs" in the House to fund whatever is popular/hard not to fund on a particular day. The goal: shame Democrats for not wanting to fund veterans or kids with cancer or what have you, then blast them with negative ads about same, probably in a year. It's not working in the short term (local newspapers are not covering the bills, really, nor the Republican attacks on vulnerable congressmen), and even PolitiFact tells me that it would look skeptically on such attacks.
One aspect of the strategy I didn't get into: how impossible it actually is to fund the entire government by reacting to negative pressure for certain programs. Over at the Center for American Progress, Michael Linden* has created a helpful chart that shows just how little of the government has been funded by these reactive bills.
Also, Republicans I've talked to agree that it would be tough to get the conference to back, say, short-term funding for the EPA or functions of the Department of Labor.
Correction, October 11, 2013: This post originally said Brad Plumer of the Washington Post created the chart.
TODAY IN SLATE
Justice Ginsburg’s Crucial Dissent in the Texas Voter ID Case
The Jarring Experience of Watching White Americans Speak Frankly About Race
How Facebook’s New Feature Could Come in Handy During a Disaster
The Most Ingenious Teaching Device Ever Invented
Sprawl, Decadence, and Environmental Ruin in Nevada
You Should Be Able to Sell Your Kidney
Or at least trade it for something.
- Texas Lab Worker on Cruise Tests Negative for Ebola as Dallas Hospital Apologizes
- Police Use Tear Gas to Break Up College Pumpkin Festival Turned Violent
- Racist Rancher Cliven Bundy Challenges Eric Holder in Bizarre Campaign Ad
- Supreme Court Allows Texas Law That Accepts Handgun Permits but not College IDs to Vote
An All-Female Mission to Mars
As a NASA guinea pig, I verified that women would be cheaper to launch than men.