26 Senators vs. Secret National Security Law

Weigel
Reporting on Politics and Policy.
June 28 2013 1:57 PM

26 Senators vs. Secret National Security Law

164229492
Ron Wyden stood with Rand, and now he's leading 25 fellow senators (not including Rand Paul) in challenging the government again.

Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images

Dan Roberts scoops that 26 senators, led by Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, have sent a formal letter to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper asking whether its spy programs "essentially relied for years on a secret body of law." Among the questions:

David Weigel David Weigel

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics

- How long has the NSA used PATRIOT Act authorities to engage in bulk collection of Americans' records? Was this collection underway when the law was reauthorized in 2006?
- Has the NSA used USA PATRIOT Act authorities to conduct bulk collection of any other types of records pertaining to Americans, beyond phone records'?
- Has the NSA collected or made any plans to collect Americans' cell-site location data in bulk'?
- Have there been any violations of the court orders permitting this bulk collection, or of the rules governing access to these records? If so, please describe these violations.
- Please identify any specific examples of instances in which intelligence gained by reviewing phone records obtained through Section 215 bulk collection proved useful in thwarting a particular terrorist plot.
Advertisement

Remember that the reason Clapper made his "least untruthful statement" about domestic spying was that Wyden prodded him. The NSA's defenders (they do exist) claim that Wyden must have used some knowledge obtained in intel briefings to know what was happening, and know what Clapper could say.

Much fuss was made during the Rand Paul filibuster that the other senators who rolled in were mostly Republicans. (The only Democrat was Wyden.) This letter contains 22 Democratic signatures and four from Republicans Mark Kirk, Mike Lee, Lisa Murkowski and Dean Heller. According to Paul's office, the senator "didn’t think it went as far as it should" and wasn't comfortable signing the letter when his changes weren't adopted.

David Weigel is a reporter for Bloomberg Politics

  Slate Plus
Slate Picks
Dec. 19 2014 4:15 PM What Happened at Slate This Week? Staff writer Lily Hay Newman shares what stories intrigued her at the magazine this week.