The Forgotten Fig Leaf That Makes the NSA Snooping Sound Less Nasty

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
June 10 2013 4:31 PM

The Forgotten Fig Leaf That Makes the NSA Snooping Sound Less Nasty

A new National Security Agency data center is seen June 10, 2013, in Bluffdale, Utah. The center, a large data farm that is set to open in the fall of 2013, will be the largest of several interconnected NSA data centers spread throughout the country.

Photo by George Frey/Getty Images

The Pew Research survey of the NSA story, conducted from Thursday through Sunday, is the sort of irritating microdata that seems to disprove the going wisdom. The going wisdom was this: The NSA snooping scandal is leading to a civil liberties backlash. But the Pew poll, looked at in a hurry, finds tolerance for large-scale spying to be on the rise since 2006.

Screen shot 2013-06-10 at 10.15.01 PM

But what about that question wording? Pew is kind enough to provide it.

Screen shot 2013-06-10 at 10.15.31 PM

Quite a difference there, between "secret court orders" and "without court approval." Why? Because six years ago, Your Congress responded (belatedly) to outrage over the NSA's mid-decade snooping by amending FISA. The 2007 Protect America Act fixed the problem by redefining "electronic surveillance," and taking most intelligence requests away from the FISA courts. You'll notice that the bill was sponsored by Mitch McConnell, even though, by 2007, McConnell's party no longer controlled the Senate. Good eye: The bill was passed by a rump of intelligence hawk Democrats and by all voting Republicans. Among the "nay" votes were Barack Obama and Joe Biden, both presidential candidates at the time.

It's useful to understand this when looking at the statements Democrats made in the Bush years and are making now. Whatever they thought of the revisions (and we know what Obama and Biden thought), Democrats can use them as a fig leaf to describe why their current snooping is less offensive than the snooping they opposed. And lucky for them, voters seem to believe them.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 


Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

After This Merger, One Company Could Control One-Third of the Planet's Beer Sales

Hidden Messages in Corporate Logos

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

How Can We Investigate Potential Dangers of Fracking Without Being Alarmist?

My Year as an Abortion Doula       

  News & Politics
Sept. 15 2014 8:56 PM The Benghazi Whistleblower Who Might Have Revealed a Massive Scandal on his Poetry Blog
Sept. 15 2014 7:27 PM Could IUDs Be the Next Great Weapon in the Battle Against Poverty?
Atlas Obscura
Sept. 16 2014 8:00 AM The Wall Street Bombing: Low-Tech Terrorism in Prohibition-era New York
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Tv Club
Sept. 15 2014 11:38 AM The Slate Doctor Who Podcast: Episode 4  A spoiler-filled discussion of "Listen."
Brow Beat
Sept. 15 2014 8:58 PM Lorde Does an Excellent Cover of Kanye West’s “Flashing Lights”
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 7:36 AM The Inspiration Drought Why our science fiction needs new dreams.
  Health & Science
Bad Astronomy
Sept. 16 2014 7:30 AM A Galaxy of Tatooines
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.