The DOJ's investigation into leaks, and the subsequent secret wave of subpoenas for reporters' phone records, fit awkwardly into the narrative of "Obama scandals." Oh, they're scandals all right. But Republicans prefer to lump them into a list than to propose some legislative fix or condemn the process. Their questions about the story to Eric Holder last week were largely designed to trap him in a lie about the chain of command for subpoenas, not whether the subpoenas should have been issued.
This might be why. From the new WaPo/ABC poll:
The wording's a little loaded ("anti-terrorism efforts!" Booga booga!) but there you have it -- only one in three people are dead-on opposed to subpoenas of reporters' phone records. This question went out before the much more intriguing discussion of whether a reporter (i.e. James Rosen) could be labeled a "co-conspirator" to get his information, but how much would that really skew the opinion?
TODAY IN SLATE
Here’s Where We Stand With Ebola
Even experienced international disaster responders are shocked at how bad it’s gotten.
Why Are Lighter-Skinned Latinos and Asians More Likely to Vote Republican?
A Woman Who Escaped the Extreme Babymaking Christian Fundamentalism of Quiverfull
Subprime Loans Are Back
And believe it or not, that’s a good thing.
It Is Very Stupid to Compare Hope Solo to Ray Rice
In Defense of HR
Startups and small businesses shouldn’t skip over a human resources department.