IRS Scandal Outrage Turns to Question of Timing

Reporting on Politics and Policy.
May 20 2013 9:56 AM

... And When Did He Know It?

White House press secretary Jay Carney displays photographs of himself before taking questions from reporters on May 15, 2013.

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

At the lower, grittier levels of politics, it's an established fact: Barack Obama is responsible for the IRS hassling Tea Party groups. Republican campaign organizations have drawn a straight line from Obama's complaints about giant 501(c)(4)s and (c)(3)s to the IRS' follow-up questions to tiny applicants. At this weekend's Virginia GOP convention, the party's nominee for attorney general accused the president of masterminding the whole shebang. "Mr. President," said state Sen. Mark Obenshain, "the next time you have the IRS target the Virginia Tea Party, you're gonna have to deal with me."

David Weigel David Weigel

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 

But when you get away from the news cycle and the Narrative Factory, it's harder to find ties between Obama and the IRS. Score one for Republicans: The White House's insistence that Obama learned of every scandal "by reading the news" has become a punchline. But, frustratingly, they haven't proved the smug guys wrong. There are, basically, two potential scandals about when the White House should have known about "Tea Party targeting."


They knew before the election! That's the most damaging possible scandal—the White House knew about the IRS' slow-walking of Tea Party applications and failed to act out before the election. If the administration knew, maybe it covered up the story! But the sad, stupid truth is that the targeting was being reported on as long as 15 months ago, when Roll Call's Janie Lorber picked up the story. Republicans discussed it from time to time. "I’ve been talking about this since June of 2012," said Mitch McConnell last week in an interview with Hugh Hewitt. "There were Tea Party groups in my state complaining about this back then."

Why didn't anything come from this? Reporters (myself included) didn't follow up. Republicans didn't make a great fuss about it—and one of the frequent failures of the political press is that it doesn't see the heat on a story until one party complains.

They knew before last week! That's the scandal birthed by this story by Peter Nicholas, who reports that the White House counsel was informed of the basics of the IRS investigation on April 22. Nailing a White House on when it learned of a scandal is a time-tested tradition. In May 2011, Eric Holder said he'd "probably heard about Fast and Furious for the first time over the last few weeks." He'd gotten memos about the scandal for months.

The White House has adapted and learned. Here's how Jay Carney handled a "timing" question last week.

Q: I want to follow up on the IRS. I still don't quite understand the timeline.  We had members of Congress complaining about this for two years. Did it just never reach you guys here at the White House that there was these complaints that conservative groups felt that they were being singled out and targeted at any point in time? 
MR. CARNEY: I'm not sure that people -- I'm sure people were aware of and knew some of the stories that had been reported about the complaints, but we were not aware of any activity or of any review conducted by the Inspector General until several weeks ago.

Several weeks? April 22? Close enough, probably. That leaves us with the theoretical scandal—maybe Obama's rhetoric convinced the IRS to go buck wild on the Tea Party!—as the best kindling for Republican activists.

David Weigel is a Slate political reporter. 


Frame Game

Hard Knocks

I was hit by a teacher in an East Texas public school. It taught me nothing.

Republicans Like Scott Walker Are Building Campaigns Around Problems That Don’t Exist

Why Greenland’s “Dark Snow” Should Worry You

If You’re Outraged by the NFL, Follow This Satirical Blowhard on Twitter

The Best Way to Organize Your Fridge

The World

Iran and the U.S. Are Allies

They’re just not ready to admit it yet.

Sports Nut

Giving Up on Goodell

How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.

Chief Justice John Roberts Says $1,000 Can’t Buy Influence in Congress. Looks Like He’s Wrong.

Farewell! Emily Bazelon on What She Will Miss About Slate.

  News & Politics
Sept. 16 2014 4:08 PM More Than Scottish Pride Scotland’s referendum isn’t about nationalism. It’s about a system that failed, and a new generation looking to take a chance on itself. 
Sept. 16 2014 2:35 PM Germany’s Nationwide Ban on Uber Lasted All of Two Weeks
The Eye
Sept. 16 2014 12:20 PM These Outdoor Cat Shelters Have More Style Than the Average Home
  Double X
The XX Factor
Sept. 15 2014 3:31 PM My Year As an Abortion Doula
  Slate Plus
Slate Plus Video
Sept. 16 2014 2:06 PM A Farewell From Emily Bazelon The former senior editor talks about her very first Slate pitch and says goodbye to the magazine.
Brow Beat
Sept. 16 2014 1:27 PM The Veronica Mars Spinoff Is Just Amusing Enough to Keep Me Watching
Future Tense
Sept. 16 2014 1:48 PM Why We Need a Federal Robotics Commission
  Health & Science
Sept. 16 2014 4:09 PM It’s All Connected What links creativity, conspiracy theories, and delusions? A phenomenon called apophenia.
Sports Nut
Sept. 15 2014 9:05 PM Giving Up on Goodell How the NFL lost the trust of its most loyal reporters.